Time Travel Technology Disclosure

This will knock your socks off. Oh, not wearing any? Then it will knock you for a loop!!!!

Check it out. There is WAY more to life than we can sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfzZkev0N4Y"]YouTube- Time Travel Technology Disclosure (1/16) on Coast to Coast AM 01-31-10

 

The flight to moon involved time travel. though time that was travel was equivalent to a few nano seconds ..

"It is neither the point in space, nor the instant in time, at which something happens that has physical reality, but only the event itself." Einstein

 

That's cool, you only took eight min to respond with an opinion on a four hour interview. Of course the subject matter IS on Time.

 

00:00 / 10:20.. where did you get 4 hours out of 10 minutes and 20 seconds?

 

This is part one of sixteen. Quite fascinating interview. Hope you check it out.

 

I see that now.. will try and listen to the rest..

 

interesting

 

Art Bell... lol
Coast to coast am... yawn

 

Art Bell is alright

He’s still on the air but in a limited fashion.

I guess he’s chillin’ these day in the philippines with what I’m guessing to be the bastard granddaughter of former Presidente Ferdinand Marcos



Hotwater

 

He beats the hell out of George Nori, that's for sure...

If I could time travel, I would go back to yesterday and not drop the last piece of cheesecake on the floor!

ZW

 

I just want to run in and say thanks for posting the first video. I watched them all. I even listened to them again just to make sure I remember most of it. I have always believed teleportation and time travel are possible.

I feel that I have done it. I move much faster than most people and I see stuff that other people don't see at the same time I see it. I see things before they happen and other people see them afterwards. I believe people could travel at light speed if they believed they could.

I like what Dr Anderson in the video said about the world is how we see it. I think the big problem they are having with time and teleportation travel is the ethics and moral implications. Dr Anderson is saying that it can be done and that what actually powers it is the real game changer with energy. I imagine that the Powers that be are having a big dileama on how to charge us for this energy and that is really the only thing holding it back. It would end the problems with pollution over night.So,the rub is that it morally it ought to be free they will be able to charge for energy at least not in the same way and not as much either.

All of it is Nicola Tesla's work he wanted to give this to the world. He wanted it to be free.

 

Yomama,

You are welcome. Cancers are good folk! ;-)

 

Ahem, that's George Noory. Noory seems interesting enough to me, so if your guy is more informative and interesting, I'm all over that.

If you could time travel to eat that slice of cheesecake, your past self would remember it as an inexplicable disappearance of the entire slice, but you'd shrug it off and say "whatever" not realizing that you stole it from yourself.

 

there is actually an equation for the theoretical minimum amount of energy required to time travel:

{[(4/3П)/C*(T2-T1)^3]/(#t2-#t1)}+∑Δs1,s2..snT, where the volume of the light sphere is defined by the time limit at T2 (time elapsed) minus (T1) time origin, at the speed of light, divided by the net thermal change within the light sphere (note:if no energy is applied to the light sphere at t1, the equation reduces to div. by 0, meaning no event occured at that T), plus the sum of all additional energy vectors altered within the light sphere from t1 to t2.

more realistically the first term is an incremental volume, and is found by integration of disk segments, as well a radiant dispersal function which would more closely approximate a light cone (and in fact would be identical with it, if one were working with light in a vacuum).

what this means is that in order to change the past, i do not have to change the past for the entire universe, but only for that portion which my actions have affected. the resulting energy requirement is far less, of course.

it requires, however, more energy than expended at T1, primarily because of "butterfly" effects on at least the atomic level such as spontaneous or induced decay of bound energy states, particularly if any cascading effects are induced.

nonetheless, to change from *within* the light sphere is impossible, from a classical standpoint, because we cannot apply or subtract energy beyond the limit of the light sphere.

non-classically?

there may be ways to entangle particle states which *will* resolve to , say, certain spin values in the future under specific conditions at a specific time in the future, whereat we would know in the present whether or not those conditions would exist, and it may even be the case that some of the 'superluminal' resonance observed in long-life laser chambers reflects this, but that requires equipment, money, and.. alas... time...

peace,


john

 

probably just an error someplace, like most such claims.