Size Relative To Size?

I often enjoy working with numbers & statistics, and this is no exception.

For the purposes of this thread not degrading to a fantasy world of their sizes being a 'typical' 8"+ (which, incidentally, I have never encountered in all the men I've been with) I am stating that the accepted average size penis here is a round 6" (which is the genuine average size).

Now, the question is whether or not you feel that the size becomes greater or smaller, depending on physical body size?

For instance, it may surprise you to learn that midgets / dwarves of, say, less than 4 foot tall, have exactly the same average size genitalia to a man of 7½ foot tall. However, it is clear that mathematically, the ratio between the sizes is going to be far greater - i.e. In the 4 foot tall midget, a 6" penis would have a ratio of 1:8, whereas the tall 7½ foot giant would be almost half that ratio with 1:15.

Now, the average height of an adult male is about 6 foot, making an average ratio of 1:12.

Working on this principle, do you believe an average size penis to be any more or less impressive when viewed on a ratio relative to height?

 

too much math and not enough vagina.

 

I've seen studies that compared penis size to height - and they seem to have mixed results to me. Look 'em up though.

I think Size is relative to Size. But I think it's more of penis size and vagina size. My dick isn't big - but my girlfriend is real tight (sometimes when we switch positions, it will NOT go back in) - so when she tells me I'm huge - I know it's true for her.

 

erectionphotos.com is a tasteful site that has limp/erect pics of men of dif. ethnicities, height, shoesize, etc. it all varies. i dont know if they go into the ratios, but it is very interesting pine man!

 

too much math ur talkin in a diff languege to me lol...

 

Im short with a extra large penis so my ratio would be fucked up.

 

Interesting question that you have posed here...Can't say that I have any experience with other guys cocks, but there really isn't any way to tell if there is a correlation, nor do I know of any studies that have conclusively determined such.

From a Canadian study:
'To determine whether "folk myths" regarding the relationships of penile size to body height and foot size have any basis in fact, 63 normally virilized men were studied. Height and stretched penile length were measured; shoe size was recorded and converted to foot length. Penile length was found to be statistically related to both body height and foot length, but with weak correlation coefficients. Height and foot size would not serve as practical estimators of penis length.'

As far as the claims of size, you always have to estimate using 'internet inches', unless a verified photo/video next to a ruler is presented, lol!

Statistically, less that 1-3% of men have 8+ inches, so there's no shortage of liars out there in cyberspace.

 

Mine's a foot long, but I don't use it as a rule.

 

I don't think that there is any link between height and penis size.

 

no connection, I know guys that are tall that are short and short guys that are long.

 

It can't be a foot long or it would be a foot!

 

A short man can have a big nose - it depends on heredity mostly. Generally, a taller man will have a larger penis than a short man, but when heredity plays a part, if your father was 5'6" but had an eight inch penis erect, you probably will too. There will be a mathematical curve in penis sizes for all men of a certain height, with some unduly large for body size and some unduly small. And there is also the issue that the size of a flaccid penis does not necessarily match the size of it erect, so locker room comparisons don't necessarily show anything.