TheMadcapSyd your an idiot. and if i ever want your input. i will ask my plant instead of you. women have something like testicles they are called ovaries. male and females are made of the same compounds and internally we are very similar. and males have breast tissue just not as much as women do.
if your orgasms feel great without most of the sense of fine touch. think how great it would feel with all the fine touch sensation. like taste most candy has a balance of sweet, tart, and salty. would sweet candy still taste good if you could barely taste sweet. (ex. if your tongue was numb due to surgery.) the human loves sex because its so deeply ingrained in our brain. i bet that if sex felt normal (for lack of a better word) humans would still want to have sex. sex is more then just pleasure. it furthers our DNA by giving us children. and without children we would go extinct. sexual pleasure is the cookie of the bribe. and i want the whole cookie not the small piece that i get because i was circumcised.
All humans are female by default until about the third month of gestation when XY chromosomes start to cause testosterone to stir things up. See the attached pic for how similar the homologous parts appear before differentiation.
TLCTugger thank you for the additional information. as you might have noticed i am against circumcision. women want to be treated as equal and they should be equal. as we are made of the same chemical compounds mostly carbon and water (H2O). both genders have hearts and brains. so being equal should mean that both genders should be protected from circumcision.
Men and women will never be equal, until a woman can be bald and have a beer belly and still think she's sexy.... :afro:
I'm cut but if I had a son I would not get him cut. If it becomes a problem with women or whatever later on, he can have it done himself. It is just a bizarre practice at this point.
God you are tiring. My cock is not numb. Sex feels great for me. My boyfriend is uncircumcised, and I seriously doubt that he enjoys sex more than me.
You realize of course that's simply irrational, right? I mean if I said my wife has two eyes but I lost one of mine, but we both laugh just as hard reading the Sunday funny papers, you'd think I was nuts right? Seeing with two eyes is a richer more vivid experience for obvious reasons. If you're circumcised you've lost about half the highly specialized pleasure receptor nerve endings called Meisner's Corpuscles. Your mucosal parts (the glans and the skin on the adjacent part of the shaft) are dry and dull instead of moist and supple, and you don't and your partners don't get to feel the skin slinking around during arousal for an exquisite frictionless rolling/gliding mode of stimulation. Doubt all you want, but the above facts aren't really subject to debate. And those are just the certain effects of every circumcision before we discuss the horrid unintended cosmetic and functional outcomes that befall at least a third of cut-at-birth males and plenty of males cut at other ages. I'm not here to drag you down, and there are things you can do to undo some of the damage, but please don't dismiss circumcision damage unless it is your intention to persuade today's parents that it's OK to chop up the sexual parts of their children.
It's perfectly okay for parents to have their infant sons circumcised. Don't let any resentful ugly-dicked blowhard tell you differently.
I'm a girl, so my opinion may not be as valuable or accepted here, but I do have to bring up the point that a very good friend of mine had a beautiful son 5 years ago, and as is tradition in this area, he was circumcised. If it weren't for the circumcision, which couldn't be completed, they wouldn't have so easily found that his urethra wasn't completely developed, which required very minor surgery to repair. It's rare that it happens, but it still frightens me. I don't have a son yet, but I'm still on the fence on whether or not I would have him circumcised. My SO is circumcised, and when I asked him his feelings, he really didn't seem to care either way. But it does seem a bit on the barbaric side and one of the most vivid memories from my childhood was taking my baby brother to be circumcised when I was 4 years old. I can still remember that poor little guy crying his eyes out for a long time and wondering what on earth they did to him to make him holler like that. I think I may ask a doctor who doesn't make his or her money off of circumcisions and see what they say about my medical concerns. I'm just glad I don't have to worry about this for a long time.
I'm uncut and am happy as I am. Although I have to admit when watching porn it looks better when the guys are cut. And no, I'm not gay!
why?? why is it ok for parents to have a cosmetic circumcision forced on there child? the parents don't feel the pain the child does. the parents don't run the risk of complications the child does. and yet its illegal to tattoo a child. so why is circumcision permissible. health benefits: the same health benefits can be matched with proper hygiene and later in life condoms. what if the child dies from the circumcision is that homicide and who should be punished? so why is circumcision permissible?
I don't think they consider death via medical procedure murder very often. I actually find it pretty offensive you'd consider that homicide. I guess if someone dies while on the operating table for cosmetic surgery, that's homicide, too. But when people dear to me have been murdered and their murderers have gotten away with manslaughter, I find it terribly offensive you'd compare a medical procedure gone wrong to murder.
Are you fucking kidding? We've got 60 pages worth of posts on this and you want us to repeat them now for your too-lazy-to-catch-up ass?
1 in 1000 is not negligible even a 1 in 10,000 chance is noticeable. what if your baby died from a circumcision? but i dont expect you TheMadcapSyd to understand chance or science or ethics for that matter. you have already shown that you don't acknowledge the pain of others. in this case babies.