If you were accused of not being an atheist, could you prove them wrong?

Since I am Lutheran, that would be a bad idea.

 

Forgetting is selective remembering. I don't vote. I emerge.

 

Sorry, wrong topic but thanks just the same. Maybe you'll find it in another forum category? :iamwithstupid:

 

Heh why did you capitalize "gods"? Be careful, I sense a little love there? You also spelled gods incorrectly but I love ya anyway.

 

Your question is "if you were accused of NOT being an athiest"

so please explain what the fuck you mean by NOT being an ATHEIST?

you may be with stupid, but I'm responding to an idiot.

 

More important question perhaps; would you like incentive to learn how to type a sentence correctly after you think of one? Congrats though, you made my ignore list.

 

What about a 'positive'? LOL

 

What would be a bad idea?

 

Are you pre-convinced of that?

 

That's deep man; what topic are you looking for?

 

Something with substance.

 

Diamonds have a lot of substance. Will those do?

 

A lot of carbon?

 

you see the word 'generally' in there?

so far, in my experience, this is always the case

but i'm leaving the door open . . .

 

This is a trick question, right? To me, the only problem is the term "proof". An atheist is someone who doesn't believe in God. I can satisfy myself that I do believe in God, and am, in fact a Christian. As for being able to "prove" that to someone else, I'm afraid they'll just have to take my word for it.

 

This is a trick question, right? To me, the only problem is the term "proof". An atheist is someone who doesn't believe in God. I can satisfy myself that I do believe in God, and am, in fact a Christian. As for being able to "prove" that to someone else, I'm afraid they'll just have to take my word for it. The fact that I spend a good part of my life arguing in defense of my faith might be taken as supporting evidence, but proof is in the pudding. The main Person I need to convince is God, and He already knows the answer.