As soon as Prop 19 passes in California you had best expect a huge backlash from the Federal Government over this issue. Now the news is out - they plan to sue California when this legislation passes. Anyone who thinks differently had best put down that bong, and think seriously about this - and be prepared. Read more here.
the federal government should stay out of arizona and california's buisness both. obama doesn;t care what the majority of people in either state want. he has his own genda and he'll muscle it onto the american public bny any means necessary too.
This made me laugh. "And if it passes, the former administrators say, Obama should sue." This would be like a parent asking their child to pay them a debt out of the allowance money they receive.
Red herrings and scare tactics? I believe that these type of articles are. They want people afraid and they want people to feel that it is a cause that is not going to be passed. Prop 19, as proposed, has some safe guards built into the draft that will negate probably being able to stop or reverse it, if passed. It is still illegal to consume in public. It is illegal for private sale. It is illegal to drive under the influence. It is illegal for use by minors. It is illegal for a licensed distributor to sell more than 1 oz. Private growers can grow no more than 25 sq feet. It is also illegal for it to be in any way moved across the borders of California. If it passes the probable scenario is that revenue dollars for the taxation will start to roll in. If challenged, the law will stand until it is reviewed by the high courts. During that time there are going to be other states who will follow suit. Especially given the revenue cow this is going to be. They may challenge it as it is political. If they do not then it appears that there is not concern. The agency pushing for the ruling to be tested in large part is the DEA, go figure. The law on Immigration in Arizona was ruled on and in my opinion it should of been as it was nothing more than a dressed up version of racial profiling. It was challenged as it transgressed on the Federal jurisdiction for Border and Immigration laws. It was challenging a Federal law and that could not be allowed to just take place. It was overstepping their jurisdiction as a state. Prop 19 by prohibiting the import or export across the California border means that they negate federal interference in passing it and also it can be challenged citing interstate commerce clauses. Under existing federal law if commerce is not interstate then it is not federal. No borders being violated, no federal issue. I think it will be challenged as a political football but it will not overturn the passing of Prop 19. That is if voters will do what they should do. That is another whole issue.
Well this is certainly an interesting issue, and one that bears close watching. Many locals in NoCal are against legalization, as it will hurt their bottom line - profit. Weed prices are already at their lowest in my recollection. A local grower I know was lamenting to me just the other day that it is no longer possible to get $4000 a pound for quality outdoor Northern California cannabis. He says he is lucky to get $1800 a pound now, and the price will drip further when this year's crops hit the streets en masse. This is of course great for the consumer, but this fellow says he can do better in the long run growing pomegranates.
Not to sound callous or anything, but those greedy folks (I'm not saying your contact is greedy) who grow and would not support legalization due to lost profits are no different than those folks (criminals) in Washington and all the other major corporations who put their own needs first (their bank accounts), rather than the well being of the rest of the people. You also have to remember though, legalization can mean lost profits, but it can also mean more customers and no jail time. Which is better? More money, possible jail time, or less money, perhaps more customers (which could potentially mean more money), no jail time?
Nothing in this article suggests that Obama actually would sue. You did read it before posting, right?
Of course I read it Duck... but this is about the possibility of that occurring, not a prediction. We all hope this will succeed (at least most of us consumers here in Cali...); and yes, many growers are greedy and all too used to making mega-profits off the backs of sick people. Dispensaries in this state run the full range of excessively profitable, to the places dedicated to serving their patients' needs at cost. I prefer the smaller collectives rather than the 'chain-store' mega-dispensaries, better quality over all and lower prices with less hassles. When and if full legalization occurs there will be profit gouging of the recreational users. But then again, what's wrong with recreational users paying tax, just like on alcohol and tobacco? It's not like they have a medical NEED for cannabis, they just want to be stoned! One way or another, this time and place in California is like living on the set of a comedy show with tragic overtones.