female circumcision interview with man in favour

Not true, it was practised in the days 'bc' (before christ) so your many many many many years off.

 

all i read was the first page
and id like to mention that iran is just plain old fucked
you can argue anything about the middle east, but when you include iran the whole thing is fucked.
iran is the most fucked up place in the world, did you know that you can kill a non-muslim and noone will even look at you? thats right no jail time no nothing.
you can go and rape 4000 women (who are not sabian, christian or muslim) and noone will give 2 fucks
really screwed up country.

 

yes it is much different than a male circ, males just remove the skin on their cock WHICH is by the way it should be , females if circed, their clit is totally removed and they have NOTHING there at all sexually there than a guy gets his cock in and out of her, she enjoys nothing of sexual fun, and before the likes of a few anti-circs we might have here start with the foreskin ,, sensitivity BS. female and male circ, has no place to compare between the two, so trying it is plain stupidity on your part, nothing is lost fom the males penis sexually and i have enjoyed the sex from many gentalmen both before and after they were cut and nothing was lost, other than a nasty odor and bad sex, for a guy to be cut, he is the better loverfor it. with females it doesnt work this way. do some resurch and im sure you will see it this way if you really want to be honest about this subject. its fine if for you to like cut or even like uncut cocks, HOW EVER trying to compare it with female circ, isnt going to work. and yes i know many bad spelling here in this but im tired of reading from those who dont know what they are saying in these two types of circ, and also those who like to use the term mutilation, it total BS,
female circ. is a mutilation of the women total sexual clitris. male circ, is not he only has the skin removed. guys dont screw with the skin they use the head of their cock, and cut cocks have been doing the job perfectly for millions of years now so your never going to stop circumsion. rant over LOL.

 

Any form of circumcision is, by definition, unnecessary mutilation.

As far as female circumcision is concerned, there are 2 types commonly practiced - the clitorectomy, and the sewing together of the labia. Unfortunately, though, among those who are barbaric enough to perform one or the other, more often than not, the 2 are combined.

As has already been stated, what right do mere mortals have - in particular, the self proclaimed fanatics who claim that their God is speaking through them to decide that they know how to improve on God's design? It strikes me that the first person to claim that God was demanding that all men should be circumcised (Abraham, I believe it was) must have been a pervert from the Biblical age - after all, we still have a disproportionately high level of perverts within the church even now. Why should we think things were any different in the B.C. years?

Just think - if it was suggested that all animals should have their genitals mutilated, there would be a public outcry, and it would be internationally banned before it got started, but when it's done to humans ... well, that's a different matter.

 

to circ, a male is in NO way shape or form mutilating him. you can belive how ever thats your choice to do so. jow ever, to circ, a female it is mutilating her beond sexual fufilment becuse she has her clit removed as well as ALL sexual feeling, a male does not have this hapen with his circ, sure the foreskin has a few nerves in it yes, but he doesnt use his foreskin in sex like some think he does. a female has nothing left when she is circed, so yes thats mutilation, now we will at this point agree to disagree on this as you have your idea of the word mutilate and i have mine, so no point in arguing about any further,

 

Scalpel & Skin (when not essentially required surgery) = mutilation regardless of where it is.

 

and you are brain dead. try reading the first page of this thread at the 9th post, i think you will see that it is quite diffrent than you think. a male is not circed, in this way unless it is done in the bush as in africa or what ever, then it is mutilation , but as we are talking here since you said it is the same as a male circ, YOU ARE WRONG on this one myfriend it is not the same and the photos as well as the explaning of it plainly shows an says it isnt the same. and i also have first hand expernce at seeing male circs, and they wasnt ,,arent,, and can never be ompared as being the same the same... and if you still think they are then you are even crazyer than i thought you were, plain fact. once again female circ, IS NOT the same as a male circ.

 

And you should try reading simple posts. Where did I ever say they were the same? Obviously male / female design is bound to be different. What I stated was that any form of unnecessary surgery, be it for cultural or religious reasons was nothing less than mutilation & should be banned outright - or at least have an age limit set on it so that the victim can choose for themselves whether or not they wish to undergo the procedure.

 

what ever I'm tired of having to defend every post i wright here when i give my ideas on this subject, some of you here are just so hung up on your self and your stupid beliefs about male circ, you cant even comprehend anyone else's opinion on it be it either /or, so at this point and time i don't really care what you or anyone else might think about it female circ, is just plain mutilation of the womens private parts , they are taken from her and she has nothing to enjoy sex with FACT HERE,,, but a man can enjoy sex with her after she is sewn up in a while latter thats BS, and you know it, male circ, is in no way done in this manor, so you take you opinion about female cir, and stick it where the sun doesn't shine, and ill stick with mine, no I'm done arguing with you and anyone else in these cut uncut threads be it over female circ, or male circ. i have my opinion as well as the right to express it same as you, and will continue to do so here and in any other post about this subject. and I'm not going to argue with you or anyone else any further about it as have been forced on me to do since joining this site, believe what you like and i am going to do the same as for me I'm right due to expenses and knowing friends who have had this horrible deed done to them. circing a male is in know way shape or forum mutilation,,,,, circing, a female is MUTILATION its a FACT,

 

Is that all you are going to talk abou here?

Edit: seems so.

 

I think, in that he says that IDEALLY it should be the girls choice to reject it, he is considerably more respectable than any female I've ever seen arguing for male circumcision.

"But it's different, they cut NERVES off of us" -fail. Females can orgasm after the most brutal of FGM, likewise for males, but it is NOT different. And the fact that there are females with the audacity to argue for one and against another blows my mind.

Just venting, nothing to see here.

 

Evolution is obviously too damn slow.

 

It would seem that as well as not understanding what the basics of mutilation are, judging by his spelling he also has very little understanding of English literacy.

 

What an idiot. Many females with perfectly normal and healthy genitalia can only orgasm from clitoral stimulation, so where does that leave those poor girls who've had it all chopped off?

A "likewise for males"? They can orgasm after FGM? Um

 

"Reality is a mistake, we must rectify it."
That's religion, right there in one fucking sentence.

 

I think it's really sick. There are different types of female circumcision. I read about girls who not only had their clitoris cut out, but they sewed their vaginas so there is only room for them to urinate and menstrate. These girls are physically incapable of having sex. I think there are surgeries to correct this (of course not to replace the clitoris, which I think is impossible most likely), but you can never erase the emotional trauma this causes. I don't know how anyone can think it's okay. It's not natural. How about teaching self restraint? A chastity belt even would be better than mutilation.

 

i think circumcision in general is a barbaric and outdated practice. but i feel if a concenting and able minded ault wants it done, that is their choice and not anyone else's.

 

he specificly stated when it started in the usa. not when it began the world over. they now a days call it bce(before common era). and yes, the eraly advocates of it here in america were prudes and pushing it to discourage masturbation.

 

No one has the right to destroy someone's genitals.

 

Ok, so I don't feel like digging up my reading that was telling me that it depends almost entireley on the relationship status/emotions of the female, just like ANY OTHER TIME... But the fact that you are attacking me as an "idiot" for thinking those who wish to cut part of a male babys genetalia off are out of line, while they're defending female babies.... You jus' makk'n a point, knicka.