If the Iraqi's who don't want the American's on their land is such an important issue to you, then why don't ship yourself over there and fight against our troops since we're doing them such an injustice?
And I guess a bunch of left-wingers on the hipforums are going to negotiate a solution, right? I am aware that this is not the "politics" forum, but common sense would tell you that war=politics. America attacks is a reality, and America attacked for good reasons.
Okay dude, honestly... I don't see how, even if the whopping 5 right wingers were omitted from these forums, you guys would make a real difference. There are far more left-wingers on here protesting against the war than there are right wingers. So why don't you guys organize some strategy to stop the war, and then find some means of spreading it to the rest of the country? I think election day spoke for itself.
I agree with changing minds, but you aren't going to change anyone's mind here. I mean, everyone who has an opinion about the war's mind is already made up. And if you were trying to change minds, then why are you trying to sweep all the right-wingers out the door? Aren't these the people whose mind's you are trying to change? And maybe the right wingers are here for the same purpose. If you want to spread information, perhaps a predominantly left wing forum isn't the right place if you are trying to make a difference. I think starting your own magazine would be more beneficial, because you could possibly reach a wider audience. And about election day, your candidate did not win so suddenly all of society is stupid? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....... I just love the way you think!
Hey man, I am an aspiring journalist as well. I am young, but still intelligent. I do not take offense to your post at all, since it was done with respect. So I guess we can just agree to disagree.
** Oh come on Jonny pull the other one it’s got bells on. Your post was flaccid over simplistic bull shit and I think you know it, which means you’re not being just plain disingenuous but are malicious lying to purposely mislead. Saying that most people that were against the war are “Anti-Israel” implies they are against the very existence of Israel which is not only unrealistic but also implies at best ethnic cleansing and at most genocide on their part. I’m not saying that there are not people that think like just as I’m aware that most US white supremacists support the war against the towelheads. As to anti-western what is that supposed to fucking mean? As to being in bed with fundamentalists I think the US pro war right wing are far closer to fundamentalists than the left wing could ever be. You’re just blowing out your arse and you know it. ** I don’t think that everyone that’s for the war is pro-white supremacy but I didn’t see many placards saying down with white supremacy, down with Christian fundamentalists, down with lies, all the propaganda seems directed for Bush and Blair ** I tell you jonny in a long history of producing crap this is your biggest pile of steaming shit I’ve seen to date. **
But in the case of the Iraqis they were completely unable to. Saddam had vast numbers of secret police ready to crush the slightest coup attempt or pro-democracy movement. Not only that but the Kurdish communists in northern Iraq actually wanted the Wests' help to rid them of Saddams regime. In Iraqi Kurdistan the Kurds were already at war with Saddams' regime long before the war started!
** The two big power brokers of Kurdistan are Massoud Barzani and Jalal Talabani both part of the Iraqi interim government council they are rivals and only a short time ago (96-7) were fighting each other in a Kurdish civil war. During that time Barzani invited Saddam in to help him get the upper hand over Talabani. Yep these plucky Kurds who Hitchen’s praises as tireless fighters against the evil Kurshish gassing Saddam were quiet happy to actually asked this Hitleresque tyrant in to help them. Changes your view somewhat doesn’t it. **
balbus we both went to the same so called peace marches somehow you dont seem to care that a large number of the people involved supported islamic jihad hamas and hezbollah . I think most people who are anti war are anti isreal, some dont realise that most of the islamic groups involved want the total destruction of isreal however unrealistic you think that is ,thats their aim. Alliance for Workers Liberty, (AWL) put a motion to the nus which was titled No to War - No to Saddam, The Motion was to reaffirm its support for the Stop The War Coalition, yet it was in protest of the Stop The War Coalition's (SWC) alliance with the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB). MAB was defined as a reactionary programme and an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. Its politics were defined as misogynist, homophobic, anti secular and anti democratic. The motion further stated "that liasing with MAB meant that many Labour Groups, women, Jews, "secular" and "progressive" Muslims would feel offended". In summary the Motion called for the NUS to support the SWC but criticise and condemn its connection to MAB. why dont you go to some peace marches with a sign saying your pro-isreal I think you are the one whose being disingenuous either that or very gullible
** jonny So you think most people that were against the war want to wipe Israel off the map? You’re not a liar you’re just a rather pathetic and delusional idiot. I was a bit annoyed with you but now I just feel sorry for you. **
I think a larger number than you think do want to wipe isreal off the map most of the muslim groups want isreal done away with but even the non muslims going there are effected by the one sided propoganda there are other issues, human rights in the islamic world doesnt get the coverage it deserves which is a much bigger subject than whats going on in isreal . but attacking isreal can be tied in to attacking capitalism and the us and uk
I'd like to see Israel and the US wiped off the map ... and France and Belgium ... Oh and Holland and India and the UAE too .... In fact I'd like the whole map wiped off the map ... no more borders for people to fight over One world, one village, one home How's that for hippy ideallism?
well then you would get other ideologys apart from nationalism controling things or fighting it out on who controls things there was a website that advocated that that claire linked to and what I think would happen is we would have a really massive war. it may happen in the long term
I find it interesting to note that you hippies hate George W. Bush and call him a terrorist, but all the while, you side with America's enemies. I also find it rather hypocritical that you hippies are ALWAYS talking about "human rights" and "peace" and "love," but when it actually comes to implementing those philosophies through action, you're the first to scream out against the use of force to accomplish such things. Let me give you a reminder, because you all are fools: The "New York Times" reported that "Saddam Hussein, in his 23 years in power, plunged [his] country into a bloodbath of medieval proportions, and exported some of that terror to his neighbors." And according to Human Rights Watch, by war and terror, Saddam had killed a million Iraqis--290,000 civilians (50,000 to 100,000 Kurds by nerve agents and mustard gas in 1987-1988) and the rest attributable to the wars he caused in Iran and Kuwait. Ahhh...my young hippies, even witnesses and victims cataloged the atrocities of the secret police: raping wives and daughters to force confessions, eye-gouging, electrocutions, acid baths, and assassinations. Many more victims had been tortured and maimed. In 1999, to curtail complaints of prison overcrowding, possibly thousands of inmates were systematically executed. And according to Britain's Tony Blair, speaking in 2003, 400,000 children died in Iraq in the previous five years as a result of the regime stealing or preventing the delivery of food and medical supplies from the international community. And of course, as we all know today, a U.S. congressional investigation uncovered that Saddam himself stole $21 billion from the United Nation's Oil-For-Food scam. The UN. Your beloved world body. A useless, morally-corrupt insane asylum run by a foul, evil man named Kofi Annan. And of course, it should come to no surprise that Saddam venerated Joseph Stalin. But in your loser hippie minds, George W. Bush is bad, bad, bad. You all are nothing but useful idiots for America's enemies.
FSU, you have posted the same post in SIX different threads. Are those words original, or are they cut and pasted from some site? When you have actually used your brain enough to come up with an original opinion or thought of your own, come back and then we can converse aside from your petty prejudices, my friend. You're what I like to call a sheep of the 'Right'. And don't get me wrong, there are many sheep of the 'Left', too.