Nah, I still firmly believe the majority of the country was dumb enough to vote for kerry, and we are just THAT dumb that we have been fooled to believe bush did. Peace and Love, Dan
Regardless, neither party would have really changed anything, so what's the point of really argueing about it?
Because Bush in literally bankrupting the US? Seeing that I'm doing the whole working member of America thing, that kinda worries me.
Kerry would not have changed anything. He and Bush are both imperialist puppets, so this election was the most pointless election ever. Nothing would have changed, but a name.
I still say Bush is worse at least from the financial perspective. He only took, what, 3 weeks to bankrupt an oil company? Imagine what he'll do in EIGHT YEARS to the US. Lawd.
Yea, he'll serve as the pawn that ultimately causes America to collaspe. There's probably no doubt that Kerry would have done the same though, but all of his fans would have praised him as some idol. They are both corporate candidates. Nothing would have changed. Third parties are not allowed in the debates. That should tell you something.
I find it interesting to note that you hippies hate George W. Bush and call him a terrorist, but all the while, you side with America's enemies. I also find it rather hypocritical that you hippies are ALWAYS talking about "human rights" and "peace" and "love," but when it actually comes to implementing those philosophies through action, you're the first to scream out against the use of force to accomplish such things. Let me give you a reminder, because you all are fools: The "New York Times" reported that "Saddam Hussein, in his 23 years in power, plunged [his] country into a bloodbath of medieval proportions, and exported some of that terror to his neighbors." And according to Human Rights Watch, by war and terror, Saddam had killed a million Iraqis--290,000 civilians (50,000 to 100,000 Kurds by nerve agents and mustard gas in 1987-1988) and the rest attributable to the wars he caused in Iran and Kuwait. Ahhh...my young hippies, even witnesses and victims cataloged the atrocities of the secret police: raping wives and daughters to force confessions, eye-gouging, electrocutions, acid baths, and assassinations. Many more victims had been tortured and maimed. In 1999, to curtail complaints of prison overcrowding, possibly thousands of inmates were systematically executed. And according to Britain's Tony Blair, speaking in 2003, 400,000 children died in Iraq in the previous five years as a result of the regime stealing or preventing the delivery of food and medical supplies from the international community. And of course, as we all know today, a U.S. congressional investigation uncovered that Saddam himself stole $21 billion from the United Nation's Oil-For-Food scam. The UN. Your beloved world body. A useless, morally-corrupt insane asylum run by a foul, evil man named Kofi Annan. And of course, it should come to no surprise that Saddam venerated Joseph Stalin. But in your loser hippie minds, George W. Bush is bad, bad, bad. You all are nothing but useful idiots for America's enemies.
FSU, you have posted the same post in SIX different threads. Those really do not look like your own words, and when you have actually used your brain enough to come up with an original opinion or thought of your own, then come back and we can converse aside from your petty prejudices, my friend. You're what I like to call a sheep of the 'Right'. And don't get me wrong, there are many sheep of the 'Left', too.
