Nuke Simulator

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by happydude_60, Jan 22, 2010.

  1. happydude_60

    happydude_60 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    A cool little simulator. You have a google earth-type satellite map. You can choose from a supplied list of cities, or type in any address. You can select the weapon type and yield (15-2000 kt), and when you detonate, the map displays the blast radius and damage area.

    http://www.nucleardarkness.org/nuclear/nuclearexplosionsimulator/
     
  2. rollingalong

    rollingalong Banned

    Messages:
    33,587
    Likes Received:
    11,008
    i was expecting graphics...its just red circles
     
  3. happydude_60

    happydude_60 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    I know, I know, it's a little lame. I was just having fun blowing up my own neighborhood. Although, when you look at the size of those red circles it's a little sobering. Drop a 2 megaton bomb on Chicago and imagine that entire radius incinerated.
     
  4. TheMadcapSyd

    TheMadcapSyd Titanic's captain, yo!

    Messages:
    11,392
    Likes Received:
    20
    What's more sobering is the red circle is just the fireball, the path of destruction goes far beyond.
     
  5. happydude_60

    happydude_60 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    If you set off a little 15 kt bomb in Manhattan, just the fireball alone makes 9/11 seem insignificant, and that's not taking into consideration the blast wave, and the radiation. Strategically placed, just one small terrorist device could shut down New York for a very long time. 3 or 4 could effectively wreck the country.
     
  6. MrDot

    MrDot Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,120
    Likes Received:
    1
    very interesting
     
  7. Dave_techie

    Dave_techie I call Sheniangans

    Messages:
    14,932
    Likes Received:
    3
    it's useless, there are bigger yields than there are in the simulator, and most deployments are from MIRV type warheads, i.e. more than one.
     
  8. happydude_60

    happydude_60 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    I wouldn't say it's totally useless. I don't believe it was intended to cover every scenario or weapon used in a full-blown nuclear exchange. But it does give a general idea what we'd face in this post-9/11 era of terrorism.
     
  9. Dave_techie

    Dave_techie I call Sheniangans

    Messages:
    14,932
    Likes Received:
    3
    the USSR's first ICBM had a 3MT warhead.

    big warheads, not hard to build.

    and underwear bombing a plane?

    I'm not as worried as that post makes me think you are.
     
  10. happydude_60

    happydude_60 Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    I'm probably not as worried as you think I am, but so what?
     
  11. dreadlocksftw

    dreadlocksftw Visitor

    Wow.

    Very sobering.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice