Well I wasn't very specific about what did happen. I just said that themnax's scenario was unlikely, and it is.
Must we get into this? The burden of proof is on the person making the statement. I explained already why that particular statement was unlikely to be true. I'm not obligated to prove it's not; that would be impossible.
Of course it would. But if you understood logic, you'd see what's wrong with stating that in an argument.
You obviously don't, so I may as well explain the concept of negative proof. Basically, it's impossible to ever prove for certain that something is false. You can prove something to be true, but no matter how unlikely something is, there's still a small possibility of its being true. Because you can never prove a negative, the fact that any specific negative cannot be proved isn't really important. It's true I can't prove that there's not an alien under my desk right now, but that doesn't make it any closer to being true. You need some positive proof -- something that indicates there is an alien under my desk -- before your argument will mean anything.
why would so many government officials risk their reputation and respect? and come out and tell the public what they were told to keep classified about their encounters with craft that where clearly under some control other than man or any other government, unless these experiences actually happened and they are telling the truth. Just look up the disclosure project
Much the father that said his sone was in th inflateable balloon shaped like a UFO, they are attention whores.
The CIA is not a credible source for anything that happens withing hte borders of the United States. Not even their stated objective. Get your shadowy secret organizations clear before trying to substatiate your claims, it just makes you look foolish. Being a spy, if indeed your cousin was, would not have meant he had any form of security clearance to know what you claim he said. Even having sufficient clearance to be trusted with certain information does not mean anybody has determined you have need to know it. All classified information is distributed on a need to know basis. So, in conclusion, I would like to ask that you stop trying to justify your cousins claims by adding "he was CIA" unless you are discussing how the US manipulates foreign governments, opreratives and subversives to further the US world agenda. Thank you for having thoughts though.
And on the other thread you was arguing about us not have no hard evidence for UFO's existing when there are thousands, if not millions of photos and videos of UFO's.
Your so wrong. The FBI is way worse than the CIA. I mean used to they used to say the CIA didn't even exist. Now they do. I wonder what else they are saying don't exist.. but do.. Hint hint.. UFOS?! Roswell... Think outside the box ffs.
I never mentioned the FBI, so STFU. Everything I said was 100% accurate. Had he mentioned the FBI, I still would have told him the same thing about security clearances. So again STFU. I made no comment on or about whether there were UFO's at area 51 or did I chime in on the Kennedy assassination, but thank you for playing. Now, STFU. Thank you
Remember how Jaqueline Kennedy crawled out of the car onto the trunk in fear. I know panic makes people do out of the ordinary things but she had world class bodyguards next to her. Why expose your body to the gunmans line of fire? Or was the gunman a lot closer?
If you recall, I never disputed the existence of UFOs. I disputed the claims of their being alien in origin.
Wow. You take things way too seriously. You need help. Now. As you stated in that post, You did say something about the CIA. Did you forget about it? I mean seriously go back and read...