I am still waiting for him to make his point. I guess though, and in agreement with subsequent posters' observations, that the longed-for point won't come. To me, there does not seem to be any reason for a gloating non-nudist being present on this forum. Move along.
Nope, sorry to disappoint. No embarrassing past incidents, no crime record, and no unhealthy attractions, unless you count beer. The point is to point out how lost your cause is. Have you read this? http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/jul/22/topless-bathing-france Even your favorite cesspool, France, is turning away...
lol, you've been to France recently have you? 4Chan sums up Urod in one comic strip (click here for pic).
I personally prefer to keep my clothing on,however I don't wish to stick my nose into the business(!) of those that feel otherwise.I,of course,am wonderfull.
I guess when you can't formulate a thought, you can always rely on someone else's idiotic doodles in Paint to convey it... And no, I haven't been to France, recently or otherwise. I just thought it would be a good illustration.
Whatever happened to the rule against personal attacks? The OP attacks everyone who disagrees with him (which is basically everyone in this forum) and seems to do everything possible to invite attacks on himself. He seems to have a free pass to make trouble and ignore the guidelines that the rest of us have to follow (usually without complaint). He has yet to make a post that shows one bit of respect for anyone other than himself. Want to raise a lot of money for HF? Get everyone to contribute a dollar who would like to see this guy booted permanently...or exiled to RT, where we expect to encounter this kind of gratuitous troublemaking. Yes, free speech means tolerating dissenting opinions, but it doesn't mean meekly tolerating this kind of mean-spirited destruction of civil conversation. HF doesn't need this, not here. It brings out the worst in everybody.
Viewed in that light, if you don't mind having debates degenerate into arguments and shouting matches, he brings a lot more to this forum than I do. According to his profile page, he is now viewing the New Body Shot thread.
Dearest sweet-pea noodist_jen, well no, that's not what you should do (i.e. continue to offer rebuttal, and ultimately, argy-bargy ad nauseum exchanges. No. This guy a troll. He is not a supporter of naturism as we know it, and from the first post set out to literally put the cat among the pigeons. This he has done. By why did he turn up in the Bare it/Naturism forum in the first place? You don't need to look too far to find the answer... NotDeadYet ... pardon? Quote: "He brings a lot more to the forum than I do." Come off the glue! He brings as much to the forum as a pauper in a pawnshop! People with like interests will blend and learn form each other. This guy wants to drive a wedge in the behind. Suggest we daisy-chain and move along, move along.
Though i'm not a nudist myself (except around the house and garden) i feel strongly that it should not be banned. When Hitler came to power, one of the first things he did was ban naturism, which was very popular in Germany at that time, with camps all over the country. He said it was on "moral" grounds, but the real reason he wanted people clothed at all times was to help him see them as objects, tools, a means to his evil ends. Is naturism allowed in places like Iran, North Korea or China? No, of course not, it's "immoral", whilst shooting people in the street is ok. Where there is naturism, there is freedom. Ban it at your peril! Urod is keeping some very bad company...
I think this is a case where your basic beliefs are so far from the mindset of habitual users of this forum that there's no chance of either side persuading the other. What if us nood doods were to go to the Fashion and Crafts board and mock them all for being obsessed with covering up their bodies? It would make as much sense as Urod's pronouncements.
I grew up around people like Urod. I know how this game works. He knows he isn't going to change your mind. He is here to torment you for being different from him. He hates the idea that there is more than one way to think and live. His strategy works on people like me. I won't be reading this forum anymore, because I don't enjoy it.
I still don't see OP's point. Nudism/naturism has always been around in some form. It always will be on some degree or other.
You're dreaming. Look up dress and modesty standards in the pre-Kinsey United States, you'd be surprised. A male could be arrested and prosecuted for appearing indecent when wearing abbreviated swimming attire, much less a woman. Not that the thought of appearing under-dressed (much less un-dressed) would cross the mind of any decent woman. I pray and dream that those times return.
Swimming in the nude was the norm even before Kinsey in the usa. swimsuits just weren't practical. you could be arrested for a lot of things depending on your race or gender in the early 1900's
Dude, I'm afraid you've been duped, most of all by you parents, and others in your community. Just cos mommy and daddy love each other very much and act all conservative in front of everyone else, doesnt mean that on occasions daddy doesnt like to watch mummy getting nailed by three of his mates. Just cos mommy is a sweet mum, doesnt mean she doesnt on those same occasions love the feeling of those guys wanting her so bad, filling her up with cock. Society is more decadent now than it every was? Throughout all of human history its always been the same, its just too easy to keep certain stuff from eveyone else There is no use going on a moral crusade for shit you never see. Others arent really having a go at you for getting on your moral high horse, they are having a go at you for being a dumbass for not working this shit out yet. They dont say it cos they cant prove this shit they dont see either. You can never really know anyone, in the end all you have is their word