What you're saying is, "what the fuck is up with those va-jay-jay shots so up close they might as well have been mangled corpses?" And I agree. What is up with that? As for penises, all I can say is that mine is gloriously awesome.
It's always interesting. I'm a very visual person, and with the exception of maybe only poop or vomit, if something is there to see, I'm going to look at it. Having looked, I'll probably feel satisfied to know what that particular one of those looks like. I remember seeing a cervix for the first time on a Lifetime show that came on Sunday mornings back in the late 80s. It was beautiful and fascinating and I was glad to have the education.
i don`t find them disgusting. I find private parts sensual and most of the time beautiful. (because let`s face it there are people that dont bother taking special care ) i usualy don`t bother looking at the insides of a womans vagina but i have seen mine and ...it `s okey. it is just not disgusting to me. and i like guys who watch and get turned on by it
That's weird, I thought I already posted in here.... Anyway, I agree, I don't find the female genitalia attractive, it doesn't do anything for me. I'm more attracted to shapes and curves. And I hate looking inside the vagina, it actually turns me off if anything, it's too much. And I'm a kinky guy, I like a lot of 'different' things, but nah, not for me. In fact when I'm at the strippers, I get them to leave their panties on, it's sexier.
I like open pussies, but not the way most magazines shoot them. The lighting they use is too bright, which makes the picture look too much like a medical exam. When you throw in extra redness from arousal, standard Hustler lighting can turn a natural thing of beauty into something resembling a deep stab wound to the abdomen. Photography 101, people. Light is everything. Playboy's rule of no separation between the lips at all is too extreme in the other direction. Unnatural. Most of their girls aren't that shy.
And Penthouse isn't what it used to be. It seems lost - no editorial direction. At least Playboy and Hustler know what they are.
Definitely. A moment of joy and magic. I can still visualize that first cover like I just saw it yesterday.
I remember when I first went to buy mine, I was with some friends, we were traveling round the city stopping outside of different news agents working up the courage to go in and get one. We'd spend like 20 minutes outside one, then get paranoid that people would know what we were up to, and move onto the next location. Eventually I just went in and bought one, then we ran to the park near our houses and hid it. You get really paranoid about that kind of stuff when you're a kid.
I remember those days well. I don't miss them. I don't have to hide anything anymore. My wife looks at them too!
That's actually how this thought came about. I prefer that. My dad is split, but it got me wondering about how other people felt about it.... Edit: Playboy doesn't have that rule to protect shy girls, it's because they consider themselves a classier magazine... I tend to agree.
I realize that. Every mag needs to stake out its own separate identity. I wish Penthouse would pick one and stick with it consistently. Maybe its editor needs to retire. I think he's as old as Hef, maybe older. If Penthouse could ride exactly halfway between Playboy and Hustler, that would be perfect for me. Except that nobody is going to beat Playboy's articles.
i keep clicking on the genitals thread, forgetting that the topic has changed, and this puts a strange image in my mind every time...