Circumsized or not?

so you like scars or something, I'm not gay but I have compared mine to what's on the net, all circumcised penises look so nasty with scars and crap, also I have been to a nudist resort and can say the intact penises age so much better

 

Many African / Asian / Arabic cultures routinely perform ritual Female Circumcision, which can be a matter of sewing the labia together and / or surgical removal of the clitoral hood. This obviously results in physical agony when the girl finally loses her virginity to her arranged husband where, after all, she considered to be not much more than property.

Whilst we in the Western World, quite rightfully consider this sort of activity as barbaric & has consequently been outlawed in most civilised countries, it is still known to happen by extremists who will take their new born daughters out of the country to have the procedures performed.

Now, while you may think that this is a totally different matter, ask yourself what the real difference is. Whether the child be male or female it's still a case of physical mutilation & should be considered a major infringement of the civil liberties when being performed for any reason other than medical necessity.

In my opinion all forms of bodily mutilation performed for religious / cultural reasons, be they circumcisions, piercings or tattoos should be similarly outlawed until the person in question has reached a suitable age of maturity when they are old enough to make a responsible decision for themselves.

 

This describes the most severe form of female circumcision, which is the least common and is outlawed world-wide. It's a common misconception that this is the only type or that this is the most common. By far the most common is the removal of the prepuce (the same structure that is removed on the male) and may or may not include trimming or removal of the labia minora. This type will only cause pain (after healing) if the labia are completely removed AND excess scar tissue results, obstructing the expansion of the vaginal opening. Even in these cases, stretching exercises can loosen the scar tissue and eliminate the pain.

The most outspoken proponents of female circumcision are the circumcised women themselves. The same occurs in the US with circumcised men. Both groups can feel sexual pleasure and orgasm, have been told their whole lives that this way is better or cleaner, and don't want to believe that their sexual organs have been harmed or their pleasure reduced.

 

I'm uncut, and i definately like it, my girlfriend loves it so it's all good

 

I absolutely care...I definitely prefer an intact guy. Circumcision takes so much away, for BOTH of us.

 

i concur!:cheers2:

 

You don't think the 'ridges' from the head as it comes out of you makes the experience more delightful?

I wasn't circumsized until I was 18. It was pretty embarrassing. I was cleaning myself under the skin and the skin got caught and wouldn't go back. The news got out all over the little town I lived in. At the time I worked at a gas station (pumping gas). Chicks would come in with short skirts on and make me wash the windshield just to tease me.

 

both have their merits lol uncut or cut they are both fun to play with

 

my wife says she likes to feel the skin role back and forth inside her

 

Not really though. The bacteria is the same, and the vagina can get just as nasty just as fast as the penis. A circumcised penis does NOT necessarily equal a clean penis, just as an intact penis doesn't automatically mean a dirty penis.

Exactly! Every boy is born with a foreskin. It's not an abnormality.

 

i never really thought about it until now but i've never actually even seen an uncircumcised penis in real life

 

just my personal opinion: maybe the man attached to the penis (circumcised or not) should be of greater importance than the status of the foreskin itself.

however, there are medical reasons to remove the foreskin - and no, its NOT like female circumsition - the only side effect is the lessened sensibility of the tip of the penis - circumcised guys can hold it longer also, hygiene is another point - "natural" guys will have to clean very very carefully and often to evade smell, and funny little bacteria cultures. however, this shoud be a no brainer anyway, so no real problem here.

I have had both - i let myself be circumcised after my 20th birthday (fresh out of the army) and had just a normal sex live bevore aswell as a normal sex live after the procedure. in my experience, most women really dont care about it (see first comment) and those that do.... well, its like asking guys if they like big or small breasts more - a matter of opinion, nothing more.

peace :cheers2:

 

You should visit South Florida. Almost everyone here is uncut - coming from Latin America or the Caribbean. (And, I'm sure they would love to show you their's )

I prefer uncut myself. Enjoy slowly exposing the head as I slide the skin back, sorta like pulling panties or briefs off the person, revealing the hidden underneath.

And for all that talk of extra care and hygiene, I like a little trace of smegma. No, not big white beads that fill the room when you slide back the skin, just a little of that natural intimate fragrance of your lover. (BTW, I also like sticking my nose against clit hoods and sniffing that little trace of smegma there).

 

What bugs me a little bit about this topic is that it sounds in different places like a "i can you cant" and " mine is better than thine" rant....

smegma is a mixture of dead cells, talg - secrets, urin and sperm traces. i personally wouldnt consider waste parts of my partners body as intimate fregrance to be sniffed at or as stimulation, but everyone how he likes it. when i wasnt circumcised i made damn sure to keep this slight "odour" at bay.

 

You copied it: "No, not big white beads that fill the room when you slide back the skin, just a little of that natural intimate fragrance of your lover;" but apparently did not read it.

Now, most uncut guys don't piss under their foreskin behind the head. If there are "sperm traces" that means they didn't wash after their last fuck or JO session. Meaning a dirty cock.

I refer to that fresh exudate from cells under the foreskin that is smegma, an accumulation of a day or so, not the stinky mess you describe from a guy who never learned to slide that thing back and bathe.

But, I also go crazy when smelling natural armpits and most people associate our natural fragrance with uncleanliness. Such is the brainwashing of "civilized" ppl.

 

hmm, I simply looked it up, smegma IS what i wrote, per definition. meaning smegma is just that also if its not present en masse.

 

Smegma IS nasty!

 

So is licking pussy and assholes and sticking your tongue into someone else's spitty mouth. :ack2:

Your point?

 

In all my years of looking under my 4skin, I have never seen a trace of smegma - where the hell did this little side discussion come from. All you gotta do is stay clean! But then again, after days in the field in the service, without a shower and little cleansing action, I didn't have any either. I think it's a smeg-herring used to distract from the glory of having a 4skin. Weep, on, you mutilated jerks - you'll never know what you're missing! Sorry....And Gumby, How many 4skiuns have you looked under for that nastiness? I fugured you for str8!