So I've been reading that teachers and health workers are being trained to recognise "potential terrorists" before they become "radicalised" - in other words when they haven't engaged in any unlawful or even dissident activity. Isn't being labelled as a threat to society just the kind of thing that would make young people disaffected and radicalised in the first place?
hmm how do you spot potential terrorists ? and why is it that we seem to have had training exercises at terrorist incidence in the UK when real events happen ? I saw this placard saying this person got in touch with the anti terrorist whatever it is and stopped a bomb going off , well there is a history of false flag terrorist events being done by government, thats how the Americans got into Vietnam its happened all over Europe where western government bombed their own people thats mainstream history . you have police pretending to be terrorists or angry demonstrators so people should be informed that not all bombs are actually the work of terrorist groups some are the work of the government , and they use these attacks to move people in certain ways . there are real jihadis they exist Ive talked to lots of them and had death threats from them ,but they are not the only people out there really if people dont agree with what Ive just said google false flag or cointelpro or gulf of tonkin , uss liberty your government isnt your friend and they may well want disaffection
Gulf of Tonkin and USS Liberty were not false flag operations. Jonny, what has this got to do with the original post?
Thanks lith. The original post was about the government's apparent policy of monitoring disaffected young people (all right: Muslims) to pick out the ones who could be at risk of getting involved in terrorist activities. Since there's no way to prove they would have gone down this route, it seems to me there's a huge danger of stigmatising minority communities even more.
