Nothing says doomsday more than...

...boomsday.

Boomsday is the boom in either insight, speakings, or sudden "surprizing" things. O, and each Of dooms upon dooms pouring on dooms draining off dooms. Certain of people show pro such, certain of other people show anti such.

My favorite kind of doom is where it only affects any unfruitful person, place, or thing. O, and it stacks either enough or endlessly by automation for a one-man, one-time, one-touch turn on point which stay on a certain keep way.

Besides, after a doom point hit (or rather fulfill), those not hit dead on due to it may then not have to dwell with any concern or consider hence in the topic "Doomsday". Doom seperates the mass river of illusion.

illusion- something that deceives by producing a false or misleading impression of reality. Example: A massive, abominable number of more than one male per place of the endlessly in coming opposite sex, is such a mass river of illusion.

But what is your favorite kind of doom distant from similar to mine?

 

More on the mass river of illusion...

Hear the quote:

'No longer' blessing present He that watch, and keep His garments, lest (so that should not) He walk 'no longer' clothing, and they see His shame. And He 'no longer' gathering them together into a place 'no longer' calling in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon but indeed a place calling in Hebrew tongue Armageddon. And His tongue Armageddon only.

^^Them together is implying the darkness of the cowardly among trying the same cowardice in blends. They see not His shame, since He has no shame, but they see His (not even Him or His, but the cowardly's dressing of an illusion) shame.

When one ask a question, the cowardly dont answer the question. When what one doesn't have a question within, the cowardly comment and question in only cowardiceness. The perverting kind speak any which way but straightly. But the illusion is see-through ever since the example (and an example which is known by the dawn of man in what man means) put in O.P. reveals the abomination is more than one male to where one knows.

Man means an aggreeance pre-set (a pre-arrangement) to dislodge away from continueing in manning something. That's why it's even mankind. Kind indeed meaning kindness since a dislodge away from illusion under no tricky aggreeance (but an honorable "true blue" aggreeance) hits harmoniously not mean. And kind indeed meaning a singular (individual) dislodge since it (on an encompassing scaling note) is no returning into a man one leave no matter where, or rather, no returning into the mass river of illusion which isn't certainly a implication of kindness.

Every individual or being is a hire to work from (by) the get-go. And in the hirings, to any original hire to work, may come aggreeances of a presenting for hiring a hire for more work (temporary or permanent). Any which enter into a permanent agreement, willingly, become bound by circumstance. Note the word "man" in permanent (it implying "man be" or "be man" even). And entering so for here (concerning this life) only mean you mean to you and mean on you rather than kind to you or kind on you. Any mean person is certainly a cowardice relieing on a cowardly hope and a cowardly dream. And any mean person shows they indeed permanent under circumstance of this particular hiring in coming up on the earth. Plus, any mean show not a mankind, but a manmean. It's--rather favorite joy is in blue or red. An aggreeance serves a joy (an utter joy is either kindness or meanness. Both HOUSE extreme difference in the lusts aspects under those utter categories), or else, no individual or being will willingly enter. And since joy should stand authentic, each should not and can not switch sides or switch the other. The kind stay kind to individual, the mean stay mean to being.

And so the mean will try cowardly to dress Him, and try cowardly to move and shape Him for now and for later, if they can. But He Who true only dislodge away from the mass river residues of illusion. Ha!


To Him, the mean mean to/on the very mean being, but also, the mean kind to/on the very mean being. They the very meankind even. They kind to being how they enjoy alone. Will any become what they dont feel kindly for? No. Will any agree for what they dont feel is a kind thing for such the any? No. You do you kindly so, no matter what any one else think. Indeed, you kindly put/do you how mean you enjoy. You will let you be you. They dont find it not kind in able to go permanent in a "man be" circumstance for life, one may prior know.

And so they, being kind to mean being or being mean, shows they stick certain into the joy which is the meanness they feel at kindly peace for being now or feel inner kindilness for being able to enter and be in the first place. Joy is a quencher nonetheleast, no matter how meaning may or may not put it to the different. Afterall, when a being is kind to being then certainly the being is utterly in kindly peaceful aggreeance with whatever the hell joy. The permanent aggreeance is kind (and pleasing) they fore-find for it providing a quenching of a meanness, one may prior know.

Hint:

"And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me "," (; and my re ward present when issue me,) Two and Too, Kind or Mean, Any, Agreeance, Enjoyment, Individual or Being, Temporary or Permanent; Shell, Will Command, Automation Command, Non-Meaning; Referrence and Preference and Bee."

^^Bold black part reads in a defining manner on down the reading direction by basing on focal point "as" by the quote piece: "to, give, every, man, according, as his, work; shall; be."

The "And" implying every which way the following words before the semicolon imply both straight or as or etc. Same for following after the semicolon. But, note how "me" sits with "present" to imply a me is certainly an individual not bound by any past doing. But after the comma is where both individual and being show clear seperation hence. And "shell" implying ingredience, chemistry, the making in general, the appearance, and the alike, seeable or non-seeable. Purple (not implying wizardtry) just implying a blend for expressing a seperation for the kind blue and mean red. Ha! "be" you know as wise is what people refer to differently since in definition it has no say on if past, pres, furture. Plus, is it be as in it pop into existing ("I am") or is it be as in past, pres and/or furure never not existing ("I am")? See? So be's "as" is referrence. And a preference also by a 'picking'-type person which prefer how it go or how to go. Remember when Sign Related did menton "be yet" instead of "be"? See my preference is even clarification which seperates me from both circumstance and confusion (sure a mean being only likes confusion and keeping to confusion when so anti-"be yet" against me placing such FOR ME reguadless the mean being case of cowardice). Only "be" WHO prefer is be yet, even without adding yet hence since it's an establishment hence from first referrence which is of relevance with WHO (INDIVIDUALITY not bound in/by circumstance, especially not circumstance of past, present, or future. Even the present WHO escape, says BEYOND. But the only way to tell not bound by past is like with or by present, since BEYOND may go even in gist since any see still the word "WHO" is usually put by the word "present" which reveals the escape and how words point to the "BEYOND." Plus, note in attention the word "come" next to the word "quickly"... Implying, there is certainly out doing the present, and there is certainly escaping the present. WHO quickly quicker in senses or aspects the cowardly can't ever clock. In gist, when WHO get back authentic sound, say, 30 years will have been like a 30 minute show over with or 30 sec.s up only. WHO don't stop for tools, but WHO may slow whole dynamics in beyond a coward's straining interpretation in what slow can only mean when basing on the realm momentum current where if you physically try to go slow motion, then surely it is such straining on muscles and etc. WHOSE individuality WHO core head and core heart, so in the beyond gist, slowing isn't against any other, say, any individual mate where authentically sound for WHO. For WHO! Rolling with "enough" says enough since a stop is below enough and not a slowing is just too much over enough concerning an Awesome Individual's return back with a return back into a then no-slow dynamic overall momentum hence to preferrence. And note that an individual's individuality momentum different than current "earth realm" momentum. In individuality there may go mixes in momentum. In gist, imagine me getting a sucking in a different momentium seperate my mate's momentum. Mind blowing how the mate dont teeth into me in a go so over my momemtum, to where one (me) will even think surely it's going to be teething in some point in, though it will not for the extra mind blowing effect which even looks awesomely lustful in seeing that since the Individual do kindly to the Individual. HELL YEAH!!! In different momentums the momentum dynamics of sight suits the one in it perfectly.. Certainly me getting a sucking by a mate implying when in different momentums the one to me, which is quicker, is willing to work harder and longer when the other is to them in a slower momentum. Yeah, WHO likes a mate willing to work harder since it is a turn on in the effort which also counts in the realm of sex of certain times. It says how much the mate willingly goes out for one their mate for the John of Johns tense the mate may initiately bring forth or bring forth when asked or told. But nothing better than a mate taking the initative in times to please the extra mile. Such kinds get satisfation in working hard like it's their indivudal expression of an art. Sure the pay off is extra when the mate notifies them however that their art is awesomely climactic making. The reward may be the review. And/or so satisfaction in times not in the hard work, but in the knowing it pleases their mate during. The saying is dont do it for self, but do it for the other, and the reward is even 10 times greater than for self in times, depending on mind set. Indeed there is different kinds of satisfication in the realm of sex. Certain get satisfation in doing the hard work for what seems like for nothing. Never forget the metaphysical aspect in the sex realm. Certain dig such "do it for nothing" treatment since such some times comes back later in a return in mind which puts them in an arousal as an after taste or after shock type rising satisfaction. The return is as an orgasium different than physical. Do to it the mate then will want more "for nothing" treatments. The mate becomes a slave to it in times on and off since got the other things in the realm of whole sex to pay mind to also). As for bee and re...

bee-
a community social gathering in order to perform some task, engage in a contest, etc.: a sewing bee; a spelling bee; a husking bee.

^^Both individual and being seperate each a seperate type bee to perform some task together by overall informative referrence only.

re2-
–preposition Chiefly Law and Commerce. in the case of; with reference to; in re.


Hint 2 to mass river of illusion:

"And it's 'no longer' calling kill lume men naught." It's? Armageddon present. The sword forth by mouth is the tongue implying one's speech. My Voice Carries? Well, that means carries also the tongue Armageddon. You know WHO got the tongue. Indeed clarity part II in the additional 4 matter from start to finish where 4 went and where 4 come, and how 4 got handling to where it ended up the result (and the missing 2 result and an addition false 1 result) ago. Which physical humans did touch any of the 4 in any way over or direct? See what referrence in a happen with a former est officeholder which tryied toppling both the effort and the warning. What rather Armageddon calling? Hmm, some intent thing till! My Armageddon don't give it away since such back then will certainly ruin it if the cowardly catch the speech in what is it. WHO make it go without saying for re-enforcing any justification. Dont need a standard spoken justification. WHO do rectify some thing when any against sweet innocent Armageddon. Ask you the cowardly then what.

"...saying, It present 'no longer' doing." Implying, It a point so do reguardless the length (even since stacks serve "do" over "doing" in however style) or any cowardly masking by hence. Plus, my slow up wail episode confirm like a bed side breakfast (break fast how news even alarmingly). Hey, recall the other "dude up in bed reaching for an alarm" cloud sign. Thought it was nothing, guess it is something confirm in fulfill.

And by agreeance, the cowardly put the keys in my hand to whoop 'em any which miraculous style. WHO stand by the agreeance either when aware or when not aware. The only thing the cowardly should do just once is agree into what get 'em HELLS they can't bail out cowardly from ever. A one-man should agree the cowardly stand in. Other than that they don't roll with should. Funny thing is maybe that's why, since a should do may damn the which agree to where a should do is teaching a meanest lesson to the cowardly. Afterall, it takes a should (a single should in the least) to be a mean being, which, the cowardly no longer rolling with should futher can not get out since no more should be with the cowardly certainly. Remember the cowardly don't do what they should do hence after becoming cowardly a mean being.

"...and there (where WHO) 'no longer' is a great earthquake (bed side wail alarm), such were knot (a tie up) till cowardly being was height over an ear (or: ancient mystery), so mighty an earthquake (bed side wail alarm), and so great."

^^Is not the earth the bed? Is not the earth's existence an ancient mystery? O, and the temple is different than house, since it is a vocal authorative matter. Vocal in the height wise.

"and the mountains 'no longer' are (is) not 'no longer' finding."

^^Certainly a temple is any mountain in type of a height. A finding indeed.

"And there (where WHO) 'no longer' falling up (is) on men a great hail out (still) of heaven."

^^Referrence to a stage removal as if that. WHO surprize rather than the cowardly surprize. Where Who may be My viewing direction and/or may be My living place in respect to a certain referrence moment.

"And the great city 'no longer' is 'no longer' dividing into three parts, and the cities of the nations 'no longer' falling:"

^^Hmm, was, is not, yet is. The cowardly know the three parts the great city, not the cities, but just the three parts the great city. Certian note the three: Federal, Psychiatric, and a big medium (either postal-type and/or operator-type since both do the same in basically in passing things of highly important communications and also highly "non-cowardly or cowardly" flammable communications. The two biggest mediums in cases tower further in height). The great city is not a city though surely the great city stations in cities of nations. In "Toss It Up" music video you see people communicating into flames, and you see how the flame travels across on top to The Ground. A cowardly being in great height over WHO The Ground Clearly? Ha! Got cha! In a later scene you see a mirror get a one-man bat-busting where the mirror goes into a bright "white and reflective" cracking shattering. Hmm. Ha! The key clue is a one-man do so there is no seven year bad luck for the one which do it or say it. Afterall, the music video is an encompass type communication. See: "every stone (any monitor's any pixel) about the weight of a talent:" The talent in visual capturing the encompassment of/in/by/with communication. Got the cowardly's height vs the non-cowardly's weight, and weight beats height. See: "; for the plague thereof 'no longer' is exceeding great." "there" is weight, but "of" is height. Plus, no longer "of" rule when got "with," "by," "in" communication. Further density for weight. Basically, the plague height, but the remedy (the anti-plague) weight. And the greedy about aspect, outside the weight or the height, simple but costly in extents temporary. "The game should be sold ('no longer' selling)."--He WHO Say. There should be a referrence and an automation for WHO may reguard in the middle. And the referrence should back the automation, and the automation should back the referrence, in either order or blend. And the referrence aspect should be a library of a different kind in pre-, during-, and/or after- automation matters since WHO with such a mix in array.

"; and the ear (or: ancient mystery) 'no longer' present 'no longer' lightening with (or: when issue) His glory."

^^To the bright "white and reflective" cracking-shattering mention. Any making issue against His glory? Any trying to sabatage or compromise His glory?

When breaking a mirror it lighten, but with semicolon the lead tip, it go either which way. Deadly, seeable, reflective, quickening, striking, sideways, downward-upward, multiple, branching, attracting to what draws, etc. Plus, travel wise 'as' is teleportation (hint: one-man strike is as that visual communication of not leaving manning but just a man. Even the image in the mirror of Him no more is the hint.). 'As' is not opposite. Also note, when dealing with semicolon, opposites and etc may apply, and how an individual prefer. Besides, both indivdual and being you know outside an overall infinite chaos. So picking a preference in what goes with semicolon. Funny how the semicolon been, but no other expect ME knew how it should do for the better reader. And the semicolon befalls the before it and the after it. Another clue which been is "and" "And behold"? And implies addition, extension, and pressto (a magician term since "and behold" may do how WHO mentions the difference in "I am" referrences). So if "behold" is "stacking continuation", the "and behold" is "additional stacking coninuation" or "extention stacking continuation". Recall how WHO reveals the momentum mixes. An addition is different nonetheleast even when the same in connecting or basic senses or aspects or classes. Another clue how semicolon implyings is: "; I come quickly" also = "Roman number 1 (hell automation) and Individual both with momentums surround the present." Now WHO isn't bound in/by present, so it leaves the cowardly which be bound by past, by pres, and by future under permanent agreeance they can refer to. O, and an individual goes by WHO since there is defining only how the "individual" prefer and there is no defining how the "individual" prefer. Any being imposing a defining toward any other, is under circumstances and is no individual and is anti-individual. When WHO make up a new word and give it WHOSE new defining, and you go all anti toward it and WHO, then WHO see you already in the HELLS of HELL. But you put you in circumstances to where WHO may whip you however since you can not speak toward WHO how one should.

Extra:

"His (Individual or Being) eyes (views; visualizations) were (was) 'as a' ('the') flame (sear, feed) of (by, with, in) fire (spark, smoke; trigger; target; aim)"

^^A person's views (the expressing type) reflect the person's eyes wherein what or whereon what. And the views also the look into or upon by any other than the core person expressing such views.

"And out of His mouth go a sharp sword (ARMAGEDDON), that with it He should smite the nations"

"And He ha (surprize) on His vesture and on His thigh a name written, KING (CIRCUMSTANCE) OF KINGS (CIRCUMSTANCES), AND LORD (REFERRENCE) OF LORDS (THE ABOMINABLE COWARDLY)"

^^Referrences explain (and explain by steal or rob by force where should) in individual clarities of any being, or any thing, or any place. And referrences do it however... By lyrics, by music in whole package, by any broadcast, in any sector in news media. Referrences tell the actual however. Referrences locate or pin point etc. however.

"'no longer' gathering together to make war against Him That 'No Longer' Seating On The Horse"

^^Implying, He not with height, but He with weight. So when you height He bring you down off since 'no longer' seating any ON-er type. When you have no weight, then your shit out of luck (circumstance) when thrown down off height.

 

sorry, i dont know what you meant...at all

 

Poor thang!

S/He gets that,

a LOT...

 

"the sky is crying" sounds better than "the sky is falling".. wanna bet.. listen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EI9TS4O5Ww4

yeah, mmmm hum. real end of the world right there baby..
August 27, 1990..

The helicopters departed at 12:44 a.m. in thick fog. Just past the landing zone was a 200-foot hill. Stevie's helicopter was piloted by Jeffrey Browne, who was unfamiliar with the flight pattern for exiting the area. He guided the helicopter to about half of the altitude needed to clear the hill before crashing into it.

http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/album.php?albumid=2674

 

The program title to program to get over with "30 Minutes Of Living Hell" or "The 30-Sec. Doomsday".

But better, "The 30 Minutes Of Beating The Rising, Living Hell."

Another thing in "Toss It Up" is the bat thing imply a one-win sport one will not go back into again in any aspect since a true winner doesn't go back since that only means the winner rather lost the sport.

Besides, to keep things moving, one should rather go do different and new-to-them to do sports. And hit up the style matches types different maybe.

And the hellians take a beaten.

The referrence say "like" concerning "Kurt Cobain" concerning the "blow brains out." And Kurt say "Know, I dont have a gun!" To me, the automation got blown by a gun not its nor individual's, but the cowardly which did the act. But the message is broad daylight to where the cowardly in whole get seen not taking consideration into the form communication which either a distress or an informing (revealing a key detail) may come by during or by after.

The blood of the prophets speak and point on up the latter and ladder even where the cowardly been in height to ensure it's a suicide only. Ha!

But communication is not subject to circumstances through the cowardly try to subject communication to circumstances. But recification enters when they get through cowardly dicing up communication. Ha! When WHO speak, say, in a thread by WHO, why do you cowardly go against the fact there is semicolons in speakings? Why go against a sudden twist in communication as if the semicolon speakings have no place when in fact semicolons are a part of communication, says puncuations which need not be written when the speaking does just fine how WHO do just now in such third post? Ha! The cowardly cant hide from sight. When the cowardly so stress the english language they sure cowardly act like the semicolon they didnt learn in ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING is in the english language which is for seperate indications. Why limit seperate indications by the english card, when it is taught in english, dummy?

The cowardly fight what is actual english they speak highly against with an anti-english.

Ay! Rectification should speak brightly more. And not just through humans, but through structures. How can you hide structures? You cant. Sure you can hide bodies in structures you only enter. But structures outside human bodies you can not hide.

Remember that episode on OUTER LIMITS where it turned out the face of the earth, those others were shelted from just in case because of the alien race's visit as if in good will, was turned into a wasteland seen out the window? And remember how the alien race even got to those in the shelters below to get those down in it? Note the structure the aliens used against those was symbolized by drilling, fire, technical problems, etc. The alien race had the general seeming guy by the back of the head/neck area with itself plugged in to bring forth a puppet like deception and get information on what? Secret locations which are structures! The key in the show was COMMUNICATION since those people kept comminicating to each other and waiting for further communication by the general seeming guy. See the distress communication and the informative communication symbolizing in that episode? Ha! You see both got dampered greatly, but you also see how weight beats height in the under tone to the top tone. Ha! And that is the expression of what? THE SEMICOLON.

And what can be stated in how a structure is affected? The cowardly know not how abnormal a structure can get affected to where nothing by human means could have did such. It may get alien on you. Even leave you merged into the wall abnornmally on the outside in broad day light. Call it the wall monument of the cowardly then since the cowardly so want to use structures to offend or since cowards dont want to see SEMICOLON speak. Ha! Show you semicolon speak with your human bodies for the seperate indications when your human bodies do get mergered in an abnormal way in structures. Then tell me WHO isn't speaking english then. Ha! Plant the cowardly head even abnormally in the very computers they use. Or leave the cowardly with a merged hand in a keyboard. To breake it means you break your hand on some SAW shit. But you dont want it noticeable so the choice is all on you... keep your hand or loose your hand... What is more important to a coward? A hand or a hiding? And ha! You cant hide in either choice then. Missing a hand? A key board/hand abnormality merger? You will fear everything in OUTERLIMITS' semicolon departments from gist of the visual weight in talents reciting in your mind or shown again on a monitor.

You know the more significant and symbolical things are in "CLOVERFIELD" (cover and inner movie and the referrences in and out stacking further), "OUTERLIMITS" (the broadcasting it and the referrences in and out stacking further), "...THE 7 DAY THEORY" (cover and inner content and the playing it and the referrences which stack for further in and out).

^^And note the only straight phrase is THE 7 DAY THEORY concerning the other parts in title.

What on mind relevant with relevance the which better. Similar with opposite sex mates, one may say. And such keep enough evening outness. What is closer in mind or in heart is better then, one may say. Or else, if you keep a certain thing better, then how will you be toward other certain things you buy not better? And how do you stay with only a single certain thing better in a bunch of other certain things? Single-track better mindedness is unfruitful to the person, says surroundings the person dont like or want to be bothered with in focus.

Who remind you, may happen during or may happen later when least expecting it surely. Concerning the rectification. Sure a surprize for any with faith in surity after nothing happens during or just after what they should not do. And so may happen only when in broad daylight way after, but dont stay away from broad daylight when you can not even though you should. "Plant that ass in the dirt, you'd swear the bitch was planted."--Him. You know only certain machinery brings attention, specially when in concrete just your neck and head stand up right to shine the coward you be. So when you offend with structures, structures shall offend you BRIGHTLY. Offend with structures against WHO or WHOSE structures, and you in for a bright daylight surprize. O, and the surprise is on His thigh. Recall account? Give and get back a building with my touches such a touch up. Lukewarm things WHO spue out. Out into surprize twists. Come, make an our abode, and watch me build it in how you know WHO adds a better touch rather a worse touch against you. What ideal is not lukewarm. But the cowardly do go ahead of their selves since they note Indivudality is with wizardtry. So get a stiff planting so abnormal. Ha! Be a statue with ground or with wall or with ceiling or with corner or with door. Then you see how the stones speak out, if they were to hold their peace (such a warm color, huh? such symbolizing an offending-type presence in the matter lukewarm).

Plus, you understand then "WHY SO(W) SERIOUS?" in why Joker told it differently concerning the scared face. Indeed deffirently implying THE SEMICOLON. And you understand then, the music video "SMILE" with Scare Face. Indeed by submerge scenes and merge scenes. Even the merge tone between the person which may be another person either in whole or in a point concerning on the cross. A funny line in Dark Night was where Joker turned, and said, "You know, you remind me of my father. I hated my father." Implying, the father of lies (the devil) since the key is in the difference in the "WHY SO SERIOUS" story. Twice implying semicolon to why it is both "why so serious?" and "why sow serious?" The tone under is implying the Joker implying hate toward the devil since the devil lies. Note lie- is "tell a tale" and "lay" releated. Even the movie is about "two-faced-ness" by Two Faced. So when you go anti-english against the semicolon speak by any one when semicolon is that which english language has, then the structure creeps up on merging you abnormally and brightly. Then any individual know why you were so damn serious with your anti-english spue against any using the semicolon tone in speech. You lie lie whenever the devil able by a cowardly can do. Keep running your "can" till rectification smack brightly. O, and keep your circumstances to you, or, find some thing merge where it... Leave you freely to think since WHO the better Author.

 

ALL aircraft don't have some sort of gauge (with ALARM) to tell them something is RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM???

Wow. That's amazing, in a horrible sort of way.

 

You shouldn't encourage Sign Related by replying to his topics.

 

Huh?

S/He is a Conspiracy Theorist ~ some would say deluxe ~

posting Conspiracy Theories ~ some might Again say deluxe ~

in a stoner/hippie Conspiracy Forum ~ deluxe, for sure!

S/He is one of the more (dare i say it? ) deluxe members/posters IN this forum.

S/He is one of the folks that made this board possible,

and kept it going while you and i were off,

thinking our posts were Political

and posting them (appropriately, imho) on the Political Boards.


No blood, Zoar? (like moar)

No foul.

:sifone:

 

Alternative news more... Follow the "as" which properly twists the face value in certain and sure respects...

"For, as a, snare; shall; it, come, on, all, them, that, dwell, on, the, face, of, the, whole, earth."

Fore and IV and hire, during, the, obvious sincere trap and the catch; shell, will command, automation command, non-meaning; semicolon, present, weigh(t) and height, existences, point out and pin point, gist, affectiveness, 'encompassing' measurement and 'encompassing' communication, a, impression and expression, by and with and in, "main", hole and purity, bed and ear and ancient mystery.

^^Reads in a defining on down the line encompass communication.

A figuring before hand...

on (second different sitting for clue) mean during, so as on is? measurement. Just got through measuring what better is is etc. relevant with relevence closer in mind or in heart. Not just measuremt but also communication, and not just either without both encompassment implying as during.

as face? Face is confront or direct; appearance; surface, so as face? impression, expression. Plus, just got through talking about "why so serious?" and "why sow serious?" which both in line is expression and impression. Sums up as direct, confront, appearance, and surface. When you confront someone you're as what? Making an impression like you're hard or wont stand for something. Example: Guy puts hand on Jimmy, and says, Look, Jimmy, dont stick my girl again! LOL!

By and with and in, unlike of, leave out any height implication (example: under implying something is over. And over is obviously implying height). So when you get down to "by, with, and in," the previous "height" mention is gets thrown down. Weight is firmly implying then rather than an if-y weigh(t).

O, and what is whole is purely whatever it is. Whether kind or mean; clean or filthy; sane or ill; red or blue; sand or water; etc. 100% basically. Example: You're a pure pile of shit. You know? And I mean it.

For is not hire, but as hire since such for need a contract with signaturizing a willingness. A hire contract is for a For-person (or person For), a For contract is for a hire-person (or "person hire"). Understand an individual or a being both original seperate hires. So it is a latter hire for a former hire. And the latter hire is different. A hire-person is up for hire for the calling For doing something. The implications may go a bunch of way and wises. Understand the person draw up? Then you understand the person is doing nothing when just a draw up. So then you see what "person hire" is is any active. So when you say person, you sure aren't implying the person is active. The first work which hire a person from a draw up, is activity in a basic functioning array.

Since on is as measurment, then what is the measurement and seperate the measurement? The encompassing communication.

A hole is keep safe (exmaples: the animals bury their nuts somewhere before the winter so the animals may get to a supply of nuts during winter. Keep in mind, in cases a person may keep whatever in a hole without taking such in back out. And a hole may be a toxic garbadge or etc.) or a trap (permanent or temporary, non-escapeable after in or escapeable after in). Find you in a bottomless hole and it's then also a topless hole to you stuck in however. The worst hole has an out into an either or worse further to you, or a straight one-way worse.

A clue in the final part is ear isn't implying a listening reguard. And ancient mystery is implying pressto, no longer near since no longer ancient when modern and no longer a mystery though the cowardly wont confirm. So the ancient mystery relies on self-confirmation with pressto (magic term for a vanish or appearence or re-apperance). Plus, in the gist apect the gist re-enforce concerning the ancient mystery's implications. And basically you get the bed in exchange in a worse way when you aren't the "ancient mystery" (The Godly of God) which builds twists for against the lukewarm in bed matters in any referrence kind it mean abominable. The lukewarm know in detail. The bed matter is foundational and/or sexual and/or ideal. When you put hole with bed, then you get the gist is the abominable get an abnormal structural merging for against such lukewarm which should get a broad daylight 'hurfully shame a coward' type impression/expression.

Luke is in blue for kind still since the build onto twist turn by God is doing the Godly of God kindly since the hole serves rectifying revenge and get back and retailiation for against the abominable cowardly. Should God release such down from the abnormal mergers? Either way it gets worse when God leave the IV, has a swell time, and then gets back to personal business against the rest abominable in whole. Should The Album hit the streets when the cowardly in a line up against the wall, so to speak? What He say? "Why you lie?!" Lay related. "Why sow serious?!" which even the story points to since a scaring is a sow. And sow and lie have to do with the bed matter. Even the Joker hinted with the girlfriend story since you know aint no girlfriend without the sexual involvement. And those serious stories implied inwardly the lukewarm and implied of the lukewarm overall also. See the weight vs height? Through me, you see the weight winning against the height.

It really is fucked up when someone says, WHY SOW SERIOUS? while sowing into your face. See also how hate grow in reflection of past which the very mind might twist in furthering the bothersomeness in how "so" match with "sow" in tone to where it plagues you as to the particular line during, say, a mean kind of moment which turns on you how the Joker implied in the serious stories. Just imagine getting a reminding everyday concerning your face which has a bright marking. A plague, aint it, especially when it is not just you to see it?

They say you are what you eat. Well, WHO also what WHO catch. Or else, how may WHO catch what isnt also WHO the trap? In a figure of speech... A trap is only as good as its catch. And a catch is only as good as its trap. And so WHO the catch 22 in respects within also.

Remember way back in school when given the oppurtunity to color something in? Funny how WHO do it while the cowardly act as if they hated their childhood in that respect. Just how they learn the semicolon, but go so anti-semicolon concerning english language expressing with it. Such anti-cheerful and anti-semicolon (basically anti-english) is the cowardly.

Check it a highlight defining read up:

Fore and IV and hire, during, the, obvious sincere trap and the catch; shell, will command, automation command, non-meaning; semicolon, present, weigh(t) and height, existences, point out and pin point, gist, affectiveness, 'encompassing' measurement and 'encompassing' communication, a, impression and expression, by and with and in, "main", hole and purity, bed and ear and ancient mystery.

^^Is WHO not then obvious sincere trap when WHO actually state the out (or: out of) the clear blue theme in broad daylight? The words not in bold color implying a mixure in kind (and Individual's weight wise. Plus, the Individual the obvious sincere trap by weight) and in mean (and Being's height wise. Plus, the Being the catch by height) and in automation command. Part in grey color stands alone though is for the in kind and against the in mean. But hole, bed, and ear no longer imply a mixure in kind and in mean, but just in automation command and in mean. The purple ancient mystery imply Wizard with Wizardtry or Godly of God. Yellow word present implies circumstance for against the bound mean being in/by it which be the abominable cowardly momentum.


To the pin point and point out...

Art and Entertainment and Sports and Books point me out, but, the only which doesn't is News Media in proper respect that is. The Beyond gets utter props point out except by the News Media. Hmm. The only way such can be is when the New Media is a fill of the devil in Legion wise. Remember the point in weight vs height... If all the devil has is the News Media for a height, then expect some thing big. Truely weight surrounding such a height, and ready to impact or cave in heavy. No height is able to stand over the Beyond. When some thing don't point me out in props, then WHO pin point such, then clearly the point out is Individual, but the pin point is Being.

Like someone shy you (a stanger far as physical human goes) don't know since have not met before, but you treat them like you know them already when you don't speak but indeed act like you already know someone shy. You even say the someone is shy, but you dont know them enough to make such the call. Recall how WHO different to different humans? Therefore when WHO see you keep to against WHOSE manner style, WHO know you the devil surely. To certain humans WHO not shy, to certain other humans WHO shy, to certain in those WHO step out shy or step into shy even. But any make a call before WHO show a shy go, is the devil. And no individual keep shy over an individual, since an individual respects the optional in and out etc. how one may go freely. Try to cap the may go freely, and certainly you a devil. How can it be a person not shy must stay not shy for life, and a person shy must stay shy for life, have another cap it? Is something the matter when a person not shy then go shy? Or a person shy then go not shy? Only a devil make it seem like something is wrong in the matter to the person. A devil prefer a bind in mannerisms of persons not a devil.

Father('s) How, The Hail, 'No Longer' Doing Hell Automation Survive These (Plagues) V Shots (Miss Reguards)!--Him reffering to the News Media concerning Him how WHO just say. See the pin point. And before He mentions "bill with this live spot". Spot = Pin point. And you know "live" is in News Media associatings. Pluck holes in since hole stack.

"Live it up (height) or give it up (height), an like demons (singular Legion), here 'em (they) scream in."--Him further. Implying, here come hole hinting by in. Stack wise you know henceforth.

For being mean the devil to be will agree for HELL (stack wise) in broad daylight how the agreeance state. An evil being puts being mean and being abominable a priority reguardless of fore-known consequences and any after lessons even before the main consequences. Here is nothing to pretend. And so by agreeing then is the being abominable. Not saying the devil can take HELL or escape HELL, "O" certainly the mean being go whole into experiences in extreme torments, but the being puts being evil priority over any thing. And an evil being lies in all sectors over the planet. An evil being will not stick in a single sector of society or nation or etc., or else the game in great lies is up which they don't prefer since evil has cowardice all in it to live an offense some other way: shallow or deep, rich or poor, knowledgeable or ignorant, donator or thief, obvious or less obvious, etc.

"...the 'as it' 'no longer' erasing all trace."--Him

"show 'em how the point shatter"--Him implying how a small hole (due to weight by impact) bring a stack effect to widen a hole. And the News Media is a show nontheleast.

"the same is He that hear the word, and anon with joy receive it;"

^^The semicolon even ensures the " is in underline. And "it" any "it."

And the scribe subscribe to permanent present a householder, bringing for out still of mean abominable being's treasure things new and old. And such mean abominable being's work no longer to a dislodge (man implying in only temporary hire).

13Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein (in implying weight wise) the "Son" of man (man implying to dislodge a temporary manning) com(e).

^^Note the 13. Note the com. Note the if-y e imply for come and for e (ELECT). Recall During The Referrence He leave the IV. The Referrence of Dislodge come ELECT. Blends well enough since voice carries tongue. But you do see the 13 sit in height? Weight beats height.

"and 'no longer' going and 'no longer' hiding thy talent in the earth:"

^^You know bold black implying hole since black draws heat, absorbs heat. Most words are written in black type or in black ink on any white or any yellow or any recycleable paper. But blue ink stands out in weight while black type/ink stands out of height. Even a copy machine keep to the black ink with maybe also a color ink side, but you see no keep to blue ink with a color ink side.

"and gather where hell automation have not 'no longer' strawing."--WHO with props then by NEWS MEDIA'S point out.

31When the Son of man shall come in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon the throne of His glory:

Note the 31. Note the latter display full truth to the mean abominable being. And the month end on a 31 which is in line in an angle with 13, but before 13 in a colume wise. Both equal 4, but WHOSE standard physical age to come equal 4. And is first to equal 4 in similar numbers "3" and "1" or "1" and "3". Baskin Robin's known for 31 flavors ago. Note the cold theme tone since He "Antartica" in address.

O, the NEW NEWS MEDIA explain truth in matters to both individual and being. Plus, the Core Head. And the media prop on CLOVERFIELD cover is missing pointing out the Beyond. But in the movie the Beyond come befallen suddenly first in the streets of the big city. And it befallen with great destruction and terror against the being Legion. Though it was night, the occurance was in broad daylight, in the movie which semicolon say come into the beyond presentense. And note the impression/expressing in the water in the cover in line with wherein the befallen hit. Ha! Note the height tone in a risen bright yellow highlighting by buildings symbolizing a bed. Note the extra thin line going east to west wise. And the other impression/expression is going from north to south in an under tone. Indeed a thin line between tones. Look real close onto the statue... You see the blue with green.

Extra note:

One's thought by mind, speak by physical voice, and write by physical hand differ from each other. Any which state one isn't gathering their thoughts right, due to one's write by hand, is obviously the devil. And the statement come many ways. Afterall, thought implies "--" for sudden change, so when you lie it is revealing you. Afterall, you can't judge thought since write and voice speak are different. Even when you think you (or one) may speak, verbally, they (or their) thought, you are way off in thought.

On paper or on screen or out the mouth you know effort is outside thought, and effort has different weight. No way should thought come verbally out the mouth or written by hand. It's the beauty in the distance from aspects. Why have more individals without having them have a distant aspect which remain scared and secret to any close?

Trading secrets. When you fix your mouth to speak, the same moment a weight effort swich off thought even though you may think not so even. Even the gist the clue since it is words you think which you will not speak, and tones in words you think which are not the same tones when coming out the mouth. Voice and write carries speech far from thought. By weight. And the voice by mind is different the voice by mouth. It even has sharp sudden changes. So when an astral projection try to embed thought the astral projector fails. Even remembering a saying is different in thought how it stands apart from any other thought voice. You astral projectors can't match the tones or the in depth dynamics to types of thought voice. The dimensions in mind in which the tones produce are far metaphysical. A lil bit more over etc., but an extra lil bit more over etc equal a puzzle code which should not and can not get a match by any astral projection. Sacred and secret equalizer with other things you know not, for different types of thought kind of sums up the gist. Ha! A dash of salt and a teaspoon of sugar. And the gist is implying you can't match how it befallen not even with your own type thoughts. No two persons alike. And due to puzzle code the different individuals even reveal different personalities and manners and etc.

You wonder why so-n-so ain't exactly the same in, say, warmth or in THE GENERAL TONE or in level in etc. as another indivdual. Otherwise the individuals stand in the same spot, but you know no two human bodies can occupy the same exact spot. Even a mirror wont have it. Otherwise it's like running to get the door. You know only one's hand fit on the door knob. The indivduals apart will come together in point if, say, born two blocks away from each other since it's in the indivdual foundation, if the exact same, in the bigger picture (pick ture). When one the same off or loss their way, the one the same do like a cat and find their individual preference/favor rather than scent.

And the hire the trap becomes the during hence for main moment main hour. --;

Nothing symbolizes in short sum gist WHO, WHOSE, INDIVIDUAL, AND INDIVIDUALITY, better than "--;" Yeah, the dash with semicolon whether the dash is single short dash or dual short dash or long dash doesn't matter since such reflects the "preference/ favor/ taste/ referrence/ manner / lean (slang for style) / leading / following / level / bed/ bed stand / point / options/ in basics/ in specifics/ in generals / ETC." to sudden change in thought with strong seperate indication.--;

Not even the "bigger picture" anymore, but the "heavier picture".--;

The hand quicker than the eye, but the thought quicker than both hand quicker and eye.--; "Dont believe everything you read"--Him (Any thing any visualize isn't thought nor should or can be or be freely thought, the gist sum by quote.--

Says man...

The soul is a temporary or permanant thing, but the individual or being should and can man up to any account alone. Each put person in how joy enjoy, and hire the person (template) for either individual task or being task. And guess which dislodge the current soul which lead into captivity in HELL (which stacks and loops)?? It's only between individual or being. Which sound more subject to circumstance? Then the answer is noteable.

You keep eternal life, and anon with joy. And sow fill amen.

But WHO dont do eternal life (confinement), but pass through by aman not amen. One-man speak WHO go in and out and find pasture etc. freely. Anything else short is permanant how life be in any past, pres, future referrence a confinement of an evil enjoyment put in then abominable will (the agreeance). And men loved (devol) darkness. It isn't "devil" before "devol", but now is "devil" since the cowardly rather have lived than live in the agreeance for damnation. Plus, the cowardly rather have WHO to turn lived than go live living lively alive in INDIVIDUALITY. But the agreeance differ between individual and being.

--;

 

x

 

Sign Related is insane. If I were you, I'd be slightly worried that my posts echo his a bit in tone and composition.

I'm not a hippy, and I think the majority of people on here are not. Nor do I know at what point 'you and I' were 'thinking our posts were political'. I wasn't a part of the whole 'politics or conspiracy?' debacle in the first place. Some of the things I talk about are political, some aren't.

But as far as Sign Related goes, he's been posting here forever, and I've never seen him make a single comprehensible post. People are just intrigued by his posts because they can't understand them. There's a reason for that: it's because they're gibberish.

 

:rofl:

No, no, no, bro! Don't take me wrong ~

S/He IS insane ~ a DELUXE Conspiracy Theorist. i don't even try to read the posts, anymore ~ not after the 'Bush Will Never Be Seen Alive Again' one. In case you haven't noticed, i DO poke fun at her/him every now and again!)

It's just ~ why be harsh? And given the Mods we've got, and their feelings towards us (WHOever 'us' is ~ in this case, a bunch of folks that don't think the theories are ALL crackpot), i have to wonder where they would have moved the threads. So, i'm semi-respectful of Sign Related ~ because of the REAL Conspiracy Theorists, the rest of us had a place to go when we were deemed persona non grata in the Politics forum.

That was all! i wasn't trying to down you ~ just sort of answering your (unasked) question about why we'd post to her/his threads.

Friends, again? :sifone:

p.s. Please tell me when my posts "echo, in tone and composition," Odon's, okay? THEN i'll start getting worried! :rofl:

 

What have you got against odon?

 

Not a damned thing "against" him ~

i admire and respect him,

and if i could come off like he does (knowledgeable, normal, logical),

Hey! i'd be worried ~ in the sense that:

Wade In the Water ~ Judy Henske

http://www.123video.nl/playvideos.asp?MovieID=301098

but HURRY to see THAT one ~ it's the best, but they're taking it off the internet.

Wade in the water,
Wade in the water, children,
Wade in the water ~
God's gonna trouble the water.

 

Remember the episode of OuterLimits where the president's motto was concerning friendship? And the alien race in fleet coming spoke, but they couldn't hear it till what looked like too late? Surprize! The He brew tongue with the account in the cowardly's actual agreeance the cowardly try not to tell. The show's episode implying in tones under tones them (individuals) blasting such being an obvous broad daylight being for HELLS, since the alien race came with speaking the being's very word bond. Ha! Note the lukewarm even. And the obvious cowardly being got hit up in that episode worse than what the being used against the alien race! Come on, how obviously stupid will you bring in destruction just because you CAN say you dont understand what the other is saying? But the obvious is if you dont understand, then why act like you assume the other is a threat to where you first to offend like how they shot first at the alien race clearing the non-manned B.S. out the way?

Understand hitting an non-alive object is not worse than hitting an object with lives in it. The cowardly in the episode shot at the manned object. It's like if one hit their fist against a wall since want to, a mean cowardly being takes it as a threat to where they call in the police and/or the ambalance to take the person which only hit a non-alive object to the mental ward. Cowardly so cowardly obvious. So the alien race in a tone tested the being on the earth to see, whether or not, the being on the earth is rather the mean and cowardly race to destroy lives first when one (the alien race) didn't destroy lives first.

Besides, only way to even think an alIen race means harm is when you know you mean harm to why you will think such as if another is the same, knowing you.

Beyond but know this know that even state, " that if"the good(manner/product)man"of"the house 'no longer' having known in what watch the thief will not come, He (the thief rather) will not have 'no longer' "watching", and will not not have 'no longer' suffering His house to be broken up. When the Godly speak, The Godly display you how you the very subject the implying speak against. The implication isnt some arguement with against you either. Saying just you the cowardly in reference in how you cant detect but assume the Godly in no singularity. O, but the Godly indeed in surprize singularity how with. The Godly channel you can't see. And you know the CORE see things in color even without colors put in "in." You cant prove or disprove how the Godly go with in a beyond aspect. You cant even prove when the Godly see you clear as day not in according the time or hour or half. Like the equilizer you cant match in setting or resetting. Seasons greetings. You know not the season the Godly in in any moment. The Godly switch it up.


Beyond and they shall say to you, See here (what Sign Related explaining in truth concerning you); or, see there (what Sign Related explaining in truth concerning individuality): 'go' not after them, nor follow them.

^^The cowardly not following intensional, though cowardly still reply and cowardly not telling why even watch as if Sign Related dont know. If you dont understand, then you will not bother reading or replying whatsoever since you base what you say on Sign Related's threads period. So the obvious reveal the very being Sign Related is pin pointing clearly. Plus, the views speak where shouldn't any follow unless abnormally seeing how shouldn't. And how the cowardly make up for abnormal viewings? Raise hail so less obvious the reason in views? Ha! Fact in reason following is how THE ONE everything and everybody on earth points out and shall point out, is obvious. Watching speaks, especially extraordinary watching.

Beyond at present baby, Hell automation'm 'no longer' thugging out, and sow crazy.

^^Knock "rock ah bye" by tone implying defining to last point out "baby." Peep which baby in store in store matter before agreeance official. Then by you no longer stealing out how a mention say by WHO which shut the store. Plus, you come no longer thugging out since consequences you in agreeance for. And sow crazy agreeance wise and viewer wise which confirm what Sign Related Saying concerning agreeance put in broad daylight back in rise in the accountment time where the sacred secrets concerning mean being should both speak.

 

x

 

The Politics are falling!

 

I guess that kills my theory..