John Lennon ?

Discussion in 'UK Music Forum' started by j700, Jan 7, 2009.

  1. j700

    j700 Member

    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok we all know John Lennon was a great songwriter
    but all that guff about make love not war, and staying in bed for 3 weeks or whatever in protest over war, I mean WTF was that about?
    So forget his music a minute and concentrate on his approach to politics and my question is:

    John Lennon : Man of politics, or tree hugging hippy sadact that knew sweet F.A. about politics?
     
  2. verseau_miracle

    verseau_miracle Banned

    Messages:
    7,911
    Likes Received:
    9
    Nowt wrong with hugging trees
     
  3. opel diamond

    opel diamond burn out

    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    1
    john lennon = over rated.
     
  4. j700

    j700 Member

    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    what about the white album ? overated as a political thinker but surely not as a great musical mind
     
  5. Bonsai Ent

    Bonsai Ent Member

    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    2
    Honestly, I think his music was OK and imagine was an ALRIGHT song, but he really doesn't do that much for me.
    Mostly he struck me as a pretentious, over-rich wannaba revolutionary.
    He wasn't a dreamer, he was daydreamer
     
  6. opel diamond

    opel diamond burn out

    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    1
    agreed bonsai.

    he does nothing for me.
     
  7. Bonsai Ent

    Bonsai Ent Member

    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    2
    And you fixed the brakes on his bike, so it's not like he doesn't owe you one either!
     
  8. Rudenoodle

    Rudenoodle Minister of propaganda Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    3,726
    Likes Received:
    11
    He most certainly made lot's of money.

    And the pacifist stance he seemed to take and encourage other to follow worked great, as long as you lived in a country that offered such a luxury.

    I never thought The Beatles offered anything to the world other than the music they were paid millions to play.

    I would say that The Beatles were the worlds first boy band.
     
  9. Roffa

    Roffa Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    8
    It's probably hard for today's youth to appreciate just how much the Beatles transformed pop music, much aided by their open-minded and inventive producer George Martin and their intensely loyal manager Brian Epstien. When they came on the scene the charts were dominated by the likes of Tommy Steele and Cliff Richard. You can get some sense of their musical evolution by listening to the #1 CD straight through. Yes they were the first boy band, the first stadium band, the first studio-only band - but they set the pattern that everyone else followed. The reason they may sound less than original nowadays is that you've grown up hearing their echoes in every guitar band on the scene.
     
  10. Indy Hippy

    Indy Hippy Zen & Bearded

    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    10
    Wonderful point man. Personally I agree wholeheartedly with what Lennon did and said, even tho I'm not a big fan of all the beatles together. He may have been rich and pretintious, but at least he was tryin' to change somethin', thats more than the majority of the people who come on this site can say of their lives. What have you tried to change for the better in your life? Absolutly nothin' myself. I'm still tryin' to get myself straightened out before I change anything big.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice