If a woman had a clone of herself made and then had sexual stimulation with it, what would that be called from a scientific stand point or from your stand point? Incest sex?...If so, how is it incest? Lesbian sex?...If so, how is it lesbian sex? Masturbation?...If so, how is it masturbation? Or what exactly would it make her and her clone be consider as for engaging in the act of sexually stimulating 'one another's' (or 'one's') body?
Clones are as different as identical twins. Sex between clones is not masturbation. Both "sister" and "incest" are socialogical terms. There is no reproductive biology aspect to two clones having sex. Whether clones can perform "incest" depends on which preacher is thumping which Bible.
cloning is asexual reproduction. to clone is to make an identical copy or, an identical twin. both twins would have the same biology but, not the same psychology. here is the fun part! if you take the chromosomes and if the donor is female (xx) and, clone chromosomes are changed to male (xy) well, do you still have identical twins or, are they now fraternal twins? are ovaries use at all in cloning, or not? their clones but, what "type" of clones? clone brother and sister sex is it incest or not?
Me and my ex used to talk about this. I've asked a few people (my mum looked at me as though I'd offered her a bag of maggots) and no one seems to know!
What if they made a clone of a guy but switched the chromosomes like blackcat666 said and made it a girl. Then the guy and his clone (a girl) had sex and had a baby. Now that would be a trip.
no the kid would not be "slow." the kid might have a small arm growing out of their head, or two faces on their head, or some such thing (i'm just kidding about this; it would not happen.) i'm not a biologist, my field is mainly psychology, but what i do know about biogentics is that the chances of adnormalities is about about the same for incest childern as for non-incest childern. the problem is when you keep the gene pool from deviantion for several generations, then the chances of future generations of off spring developing "bad shit" from a stagent gene pool goes up quite dramatically! you could get away with incest for a "few" generations (short term) with only a very, very, small chance of biological problems. it is the long term generations of off spring, that will pay one hell of a very, very, very, terrible price biologicalily though! is there someone here who has a strong background in biogentics, who can verify if i am right on my main points here? to the best of my knowledge everthing i've said is correct here.
How does it affect children of biological dads, like the current case in Texas? Do they consider the girls they have sex with? Do they worry about what their connection is?
I been tryin to get 2 clones of me to root. So far I had no success. Thats just crazy cause normaly I can grow roots on a monkey wrench. Anyhow, I was tryin to get 2 clones of me to root so I could force them to have sex with each other while I watch. Now THAT sounds hot, -forcing me to have sex with myself while I watched. If for some reason I didnt want to watch, mabey I could get me to FORCE myself to watch! Oh YEAA now... THAT sounds GOOOOOOOOODdddd! Heh heh.
this one possible. women cannot have y, but men always have x. the question is : can DNA system hold twin X? (xx) would that make his descendant all same? the baby must be like their father or their mother. because his x and y come from same source..
I think it's lesbian sex... it's not family, it's you. so you're sexually stimulating the same person as yourself, not another relative. I don't think it's masturbation because you're sexually stimulating someone who happens to have same DNA as you do. masturbation is sexually stimulating yourself, not someone who happens to be the same person. it's two people of the same sex engaging in a sexual act.