Girls how would you describe an attractive penis?

I don't understand how anyone can claim that there is no loss of sensitivity on a circumcised penis, when a circumcised glans is sufficiently deadened to enable quite rough contact by hand, or even by cloth, when underwear rubs against it. The uncircumcised glans, however, is so sensitive that the slightest unlubricated contact with it can send the owner through the roof.

I have recently been diagnosed as having Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans, which is a condition whereby the foreskin is too tight to be comfortably drawn back, due to an excessively sized girth, tapering towards the centre of the shaft. This can frequently cause the skin to tear, for which I have been prescribed a steroid cream for now.

However, if the cream is not successful in the long term, then the only option remaining, which the doctor agrees should only be used as a last resort, would be circumcision, and that is certainly a road I don't want to have to go down.

 

^ I;ve found that cut men are not 'deadened' by any means, however I think that the surgery is not neccesary.

 

wats the different with ones thats not??

 

^really thin.

 

Its long, but nice.

Tiffany

 

I wish that mine was that long ... but i cannot imagine it feeling any better than it does now at 6"










I love masturbating and riding the edge!

 

Aesthetically I prefer a healthy pinkish color,as little veins as possible,average length and thickness,and curving upward.

 

I'm cut and have, what I believe to be, plenty of sensation. The bulk of my orgasm comes from within and the sensitivity at the head really means little. In fact after orgasm it becomes hyper sensitive and cant be touched for some time. I cant speak for others but as far as I'm concerned lack of sensitivity is a myth.

 

About 7 inches and thick. medium veins and an olive type color

what do u think about veins? I like them
do u consider veiny cocks as ugly? NO makes them look strong
what do u think about the head? my favorite part
which looks better to u do u prefer mushroom helmet head / same thick all the way? mushroom
what about color? pink to olive
do u hate discoloration, what color do u prefer white/black cocks? white
do u prefer big/small balls? big enough to hang

finally, if u have to make a choice what would u choose:
ugly cock but big / pretty cock but small? a small cock by my def is not pretty so I guess teh ugly one.

 

First off, lets take a look at glans (head) sensitivity. The glans and corona are made of a different type of skin which will not thicken or form a callous from being rubbed, much like the inside of your mouth.

As a young teen I was told that circumcised guys could last longer because their glans were exposed all of the time and rubbing against the underwear caused sensitivity loss. Since I thought that I was too sensitive I took to skinning it back at every opportunity …. multiple times each day. This didn’t lead to any sensitivity loss. but did result in my masturbation count going off the charts!

So, at this point we are in agreement, circumcision reduces sensitivity of the glans very little, if at all.

Now, secondly. lets take a look at the foreskin and frenulum
Frenulum {or frenum} is the proper name for any fold of skin {or stringy thingie} that limits the movement of any body part {like under your tongue}. Your penile frenulum is that stringy fold of foreskin that connect the glans to the foreskin, and it helps prevent the foreskin from tearing loose from the corona and avoiding pain and blood.

Now for the mechanics. When the foreskin is retracted you can see the surface that had been in contact with the glans … an inch or so of skin that had been hidden … usually pinker than the remainder of the shaft skin ….and when aroused it becomes much more sensitive. The frenulum runs longitudinally from the glans through this area and is the primary trigger point for male orgasm, much as the underside of a woman’s clitoris is the key to many (most?) female orgasms.

When the Rabbi bites off (or the surgeon cuts off) the foreskin he removes roughly equal portions of inner and outer foreskin.

The outer skin has x-number of nerve endings per square millimeter and the inner skin has 10 or 20 times as many nerve endings per square mm.

Depending on the particular circumcision, at the very minimum one square inch of very sensitive skin is excised from the penis! Thousands of nerve endings (pleasure giving nerve endings) disappear into the infinity of eternity ….. never to be seen again!

Foreskin restoration by stretching the foreskin will probably give more skin area, but there are no new nerves created; they just become further apart. More area, but the same number of nerve endings, lower nerve density. Those lost nerve endings will never return!

Now, please explain to me how a person can loose so many nerves without losing feeling?

BTW, wasn’t circumcision promoted by religious leaders to discourage childhood masturbation?



Have fun, play safely, and do not mutilate!

 

In this day & age people who hear voices, who they claim to be from God & insist on inflicting physical self harm are usually, and quite rightly so, put under the care to the local psychiatric facilities.

However, a few Milena ago someone (Abraham, I believe) who seems to have fallen under this category claims to have been hearing the words of God who has told him that he, and all males should cut off their foreskins.

You may well ask how many people may follow the rantings of such people making similar claims these days, and the answer would obviously be precious few, yet I find it baggers belief that so many are still following the claims of someone who nowadays would have been placed in care for his own well being.

That's just the religious side of things. Then there is the cultural side of things, which was primarily instigated by supposed doctors of psychiatry, who were not really any more advanced than the doctrine of leeches. They were convinced that masturbation was a prime cause of insanity, when modern medicine has pr oven evidence to the exact contrary. One of the leading doctors of his day was the famous Dr Kellogg, of cornflake fame, who was fanatical about the eradication of all forms of masturbation, by the use of many forms, including the design & use of barbaric chastity belts that would press spikes painfully into the penis whenever any degree of spontaneous erection occurred.

Needless to say, the use of such devices has long been outlawed & declared as being a breach of human rights, yet the single most testament to his existence is his insistence that all his patients should be circumcised so as to stop them from masturbating, and that parents should do likewise to their sons as a pre-emptive measure to protect their sanity in the future.

This is a doctor who, if he practiced such acts of barbarism these days would most certainly be struck off the medical register, and with his obvious instability of mind regarding masturbation & all things sexual in general, would probably end up as a psychiatric patient himself.

What is most amazing, though, is how many people continue to hold true to his teachings - many without even realising the origins or the reason for the culture of performing the act of circumcision when there is no medical need for it. Instead they continue to hold fast to the logic that they are circumcised & remain sane - which has much the same logic as assaying that if you have your toenails surgically removed then your nipples will not fall off.

Despite what Dr Kellogg may have wished, circumcision does not stop boys from masturbating (even though it does often mean that some form of lubrication is required), nor is it in any way harmful. Medical research has shown beyond doubt that it prevents prostate cancer as well as being positively therapeutic psychologically by releasing inner tension that may otherwise result in more violent outlets.

 

John Kellogg was a Seventh-day Adventist and an American.

You need to cut us Yanks some slack .... we're just beginners at this civilization B.S.





Have fun, play safely, and guard your foreskins!

 

did i not read in another forum that your boyfriend has a massive dick as thick as a "pop can" lol
average? methinks not.

 

Jim - - You should cut the lady some slack . She said that her thing is thickness, not length!

A pop can is a little under 5” (12cm) in length and a whopping eight and a quarter inches (21cm) around ... and uncut.






Play safely and don't make fun of people!

 

Thanks 4skin.

I'm not playing game with you guys anymore. I'm out. If I get personally attacked once more I'm reporting whoever does it.

 

hey 4skin
all you talk about is 4skin, i hope you are not sick thinking about your foreskin wishing that it was cut when you were young.
there are 2 threads to talk about 4skin,
so please DO NOT CHASNGE ALL TOPICS INTO FORESKIN ARGUMENT.

i tried to get girls opinions about some quistion but as usual you changed the topic. Would you please let me ask them again and keep the topic as it is here.

 

Dear curious.openminded— By my count, out of the first 45 responses to the initial question there were 16 that were responsive and mentioned circumcision, 9 that were responsive and did not mention circumcision, and 20 that were non-responsive, including my #42 post. The OP mentioned circumcision in his first post.

In my first post in this thread (#42) I did not mention circumcision or foreskins, although it was one of the non-responsive posts. I had not noticed #43 by Sarahrei until now … and her mega boost sends me through the ceiling! (sorry that I didn’t thank you before this Sarah. Thank you!)

It appears that Sig was the poster who started the bickering about foreskins when he challenged Sarahrei in post #47. After that I stopped counting but I did look at each post. Sig posted a total of eight posts arguing for circumcision, all before I made my first and last post about circumcision in post #72 when I responded to Wild Mountain Dave. That’s about 1/3 of the total posts. (but of course he is on your side of the cut/uncut preference)


Starting post #21 it appears that you (curious.openminded) were trying pretty hard to turn this into a thread for your purposes. See posts #21, #37, #39.

It seems to me, that when we look at the facts, you don’t have any facts straight.

For my part, I may be screwed up, but I’ve NEVER had the desire to mutilate my genitals. Can your regrow your foreskin? I don’t think so, and you have my sympathy. I hope that you don’t hate your Mom because of what she did to your little pee-pee!



Like others, I’m not playing anymore either. I’m out. Guys like you spoil the enjoyment of the majority!

 

Man, I fuckin hate the hatred of circumcision on this site.

I understand disagreeing with the religious aspect of it. Forcing a kid to do something based on religion really boils my blood. But the fact is that a cut penis is easier to keep clean and has less chance of getting infected or having foreskin related complications.

Whether there is a loss of sensation is debatable, but if it's true I could care less. All that means is that I last longer, and pleasing her is what get's me off.

Yes, taking a knife to a baby's genitals seems awkward at the least, but they have no memory of it and the benefits may outweigh the risks.

All I'm saying is stop calling it mutilation or a barbaric act. It's not. And I'm fucking glad that I don't have that nasty hood covering the penis that I love dearly.

Peace

 

Hatred of circumcision is universal. Almost seems like a trend these days. I happen to prefer cut as it looks more pleasing and ready to my eyes.

 

I hate circumision more then I hate god, which is saying something. However the conversations on this forum about it is like beating a dead horse. They never go anywhere, as far as I'm concerned, the men in my life aren't cut, and my son wont be cut. But if you happy with your dick then more power to you, and if you know how to work it well then thats great too.