What happened to the building 7 controlled explosion thread?

Its funny how CNN released the "Final Report" and said as far as they know it is the truth. But they encourage 'conspiracy theorists' to send in their own and they will make an inquirey into those.

So basicly they released a final report that they say is pure fact, but want others to send their theories which might also be true....

 

I"m glad there is somebody who sees reason in this world

 

the process with they might go through to arrange a controlled demolition pales in comparison to the fact that it damn well did fall as a controlled demolition would.

Larry Silverstein admitted that they pulled the building.

so that right there says:
a.) no, you don't have to strip a building to it's core to be able to pull it, there are alternative methods.
b.) they did strip it to the core prior to the pulling (construction)

most likely option a.

either way, the "tools" to pull it were admittedly in place...discussing how the explosives got there in an attempt to disprove what could only be attributed to explosives is...trivial.

it's just a matter of... to press the big red button, or to not?

 

and besides
have you all forgotten they had eye witnesses who said levels of the twin towers were vacated weeks prior to 9/11?

they had time to do this. they did it right under your noses.

 

Too much of a risk, America would self implode if it were discovered that it was an inside job, I don't think the government would take that risk, it would literally tear up the country, republican party would be gone for good, there'd be a revolution, a physical one.

Having said that, building 7 still looks like it was a planned demolition.

 

But thanks to the media, the majority will continue to believe the official story.

 

Still too much of a risk.

 

I don't think you get it dude... the Owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, confirmed that they "pulled" the building.

you can't pull a building without wiring it.

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." –Larry Silverstein

if the planes really destroyed the towers in such a fashion, demolition experts, quit your day job, we don't need you anymore.

 

So I guess it's just a simple coincidence that, on that one day, two other highrise steel-frame buildings collapsed, allegedly due to fire, when never before had a building like that ever collapsed from fire in the history of highrise steel-frame buildings.

It's also not a problem that they're covering up what really happened by saying that fire brought down the building? If it's as standard of a procedure as you're making it sound, then why didn't they just come out and admit it? Why are they taking so much time and effort to prove to us that fire brought the building down (albeit with little to no actual proof)?

So in other words you are admitting that you believe they brought the building down, but you see nothing wrong with that?

If they're lying about one thing, what would make you believe they're telling the truth about anything else? What would make anyone believe that 19 Muslim hijackers with BOXCUTTERS carried out the attacks, on orders from a known CIA asset, when absolutely NO EVIDENCE has been presented to prove this? As a matter of fact, it has been admitted by very prominent people in government that the evidence (or lack thereof) against OBL would not stand up in a court of law.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yw7zwG3Q48

basically a 7 minite video of this thread (at least from the truthers pov)

 

I actually can believe that the wiring was in place for the demolition of the building, but I still have reservations about the destruction of the building as part of a conspiracy done by the United States government. I'm sure that the demolitions were not in place already on construction, because I'm sure our terrorist friends would love to know that. Additionally, it would still be noticeable if government agents were installing demolitions throughout the building the night before or even during the attack. Finally, what's one more building? If building 7 had not collapsed people would not have cared more or less about the attack. The majority of America has forgotten about building 7.

As for the collapse of the two towers, I do believe it was the high temperature of the fires that ultimately brought the buildings down. Never before has there been a fire that spanned so many floors, with so much flammable fuels (jet fuel, furniture, paperwork) in the history of high rises. If we take the example of the pentagon, the building suffered enormous fire damage after the attack, especially for a building made up of so much stone and tile. As for those that believe it was a missile that hit the pentagon, there is no such missile that could have delievered such a massive hit to the building's structure.

 

There were no other buildings in history that were designed like the towers,

There were no other buildings that were hit with planes and burned the way the towers did.

And just to cover all my bases here,


The pentagon was hit with a plane.


"ding-ding"

 

lies.

 

Why are you all so eager to believe what the government says.


Its the government.


They are in the business of taking your money.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cue...s-2424-0-20-20--.html&feature=player_embedded

 

Weird, but is this censorship?

 

censoring of what?

 

http://www.hipforums.com/newforums/showthread.php?t=337260&f=352

I posted this thread and I stated that I was not ever censored on this website, you stated the same thing.

Then the thread was censored.

I just thought that was odd because I donated money to a site that I thought was dedicated to the freedom of speech.

Oh well that's life.