Notice an actual cover up exposed 8/8/08

I'll just ask you two questions and see if I aint the only one who noticed...

1. Have any of you in your rational and awake life time (yeah, where it counts) ever learned after a court hearing/trial that someone famous served jury duty?

2. If you never learned of this to your knowledge, then what does that say about the judical system on the claimed random jury selection ASPECT that's supposed to be in place here in the U.S.

According to something I came across in the Anti-Christ bible it is apparent to me that "the" court period (at least here that I can attest to if that's the correct word) is a standing corruption. This I think I exposed (not coincidentally on 8-8-08) is consistant in revealing what makes it corrupt.

Don't buy the bible, then do the math... Ask famous stars, not when they werent famous, if they had to serve a jury duty since having been famous. I'm talking top stars on a national or globe level of fame. Plus, ask 'em if jury service from a summons, if they ever even got one while famous, was called off. Big stars in the movie related world and athlete related world (maybe even news media related world) can all be considered super stars of the famous. No where in the rules for who makes a jury does it state a no famous person or no super star person rule. So ask yourself what is actually in place if the so-called random select isnt what it actually and honestly is.

I bet you not a single super star will tell you that they served on jury duty since being a star. That alone tells you the court is technically corruption.

You'll never hear of the day Micheal Jackson, Micheal Jordan, Lou Dobbs, Jim Carry, Beonce, David Letterman, Julia Robberts, or etc. of all genders and races ever having to serve jury duty.

If this is the case, then think of all the pre-fixed in the jury pool that are selected for a day and hour to convict or not convict with knowing the verdict they are to give in advance, potentially being apart of the corruption...

It is your duty to not only investigate the court on such the matter being exposed, but to confront where up the latter the order corrupt order was/is given. Is it at the secretary of state where the corruption is in order to keep covered up? Or etc? Some state of federal function is keeping the famous out of the picture if in fact this is truely going on. Hell, ask ppl not famous if they ever recall serving on a jury duty with someone who happened to be a super star... Ask around though you shouldnt because those ppl if they were would have been told after a case was over with that they actually got to serve with someone famous as if it's their life story. You would to treat such as your life story if you ever had to serve with someone famous in jury duty.

 

Not to dis your research man, but you don't need the Anti-Christ bible to know that our courts are corrupt...

I have never been called for jury duty...maybe I'm famous...
Wooo Hooo!!!

 

And if the super stars arent showing up, seeking to pay a fine for not, then that would have been a reported trend that would have been made the news. So I dont think even that is the case even because famous ppl are usually prone to want to make an impact or a difference in the world or their community.

 

It's not hard to get yourself excused from jury duty, if a letter is sent to lebaron james saying he needs to come be on a jury and hes in the fucking Bahamas on a break what do you think he's gonna do come to court? Stars have a lot of shit that they do, it might not be as important as everyone else's shit but they're stars and in America celebrities rule.

 

According to the jury sommons rules. A person is allowed to postphone once only after you're reason is approved. Usually ppl get approved postphonement like if they are in, say, college during sem. The ppl 100% exempt are felons, government workers, and the handicap only. No where will you see a no-famous person rule to exemp the stars. Any judge who would let a star off after the selection should be removed because they tainted the jury while knowing they are supposed to honor the rules on only who is supposed to be exempt.

 

Yes, it's all corrupt: the courts, the gov't, the flour industry, TV, videogames, you name it, it's corrupt.

The Mushroom Man

 

you don't understand the jury selectment process

you are summoned to jury duty

you are now part of a pool, and you MAY serve on a jury

the prosecution and defense can dismiss you if they think you might hurt their case.

OR IF YOU WILL DISTRACT THE OTHER JURORS!

no defense attorney on this earth would ever let a celeb be a juror, too much chance of one juror taking the whole jury.

it's not a conspiracy, it's just that you don't understand the process, so you are trying to shroud it in mysticism so maybe you can convince some poor fool to be as amazed as you are.

 

^^If they give it not the chance (in how you think they put it), and just assume something like a delusional, that is discrimination. Thus it means there is corruption in that process of Jury selection allowed by the court. If you cant see that based on what you said, then you are as blind as the ignorant and foolish. And if you are for it, then you are a disciminator of a ppl who just happen to be super stars.

 

I think there is a conflict of interest with having a very high profile jury member like an actor, writer, or politician. Courts are corrupted, but this phenomenon is simply protocol; they want nobodies on jury duty. Average folk.

 

Not too long ago I'm pretty sure I heard that oprah got called for jury duty...i'll look into that and come back with the verdict, haha...

 

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,681954,00.html ....its true

 

guess thats not what you wanted to hear?!

 

Obviously not...