lol im not sure if this is a joke/sarcasm, because im to high to tell. but this is completely untrue. almost no weed is laced without knowledge of the buyer. drugs like crack cost money, dealers are not giving that shit away for free when they most likely have a hard time keeping up with all the people who want to pay for it. and lsd is destroyed by heat so its unsmokable
Haha yeah, I was hoping the smiley face and the excessive use of ?'s and !'s would give it away. Sarcasm is hard to pull off on the internet.
You don't need to inhale the carcinogens to get high though. A vape or hookah will boil off the THC at temperatures waaaay below burning levels... but I hate vape and hookah highs so I'll stick to the unhealthier burning of bud. It's obvious that neither weed or tobacco is good for you but smoke a few Camel Reds and then smoke a few js and you know which is worse for you. After a few months of smoking butts I'm starting to feel pretty shitty but I still love 'em. They go hand in hand with weed for me and they're becoming a pretty nasty habit.
i think if you smoke weed first and then smoke a cig then its double damage. The weed dialates your lungs and then the cigarette smoke gets even deeper into your lungs and fucks shit up more. but idk.
Although I do believe it's true that smoking an entire joint would be the equivalent of 4 filtered cigarettes.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm One study never proves anything, but if you get 50% tumor reduction from anything it's worth looking into extensively. I won't go around saying marijuana cures cancer, but it's obviously very interesting when coupled with big studies that show that it doesn't cause it (http://www.webmd.com/lung-cancer/news/20060523/pot-smoking-not-linked-to-lung-cancer).
maybe schwag. but i think its not even close. my lungs get fucked up from cigarettes but weed does not make them feel as shitty....nowhere close. but in no way am i saying it does not damage your lungs at all.