Lights. Camera. Action.

Part 1:

Can an action be without a beginning/start?

If you say yes, then name an action that just is (or: was) without ever having to begin/start.

If you say no, then that is as good as saying existence must have popped into existence, correct?

They say actions speak louder than words. I personally think action is the obviously brightest answer to our once commonly held mystery about existence itself.

Part 2:

Are things matter (iron, etc) and non-matter (gravity, awareness/consciousness/person, etc) an action?

Certain might realize that matter and non-matter started. If that is correct, then we can define them as an action, correct? All action requires is a beginning/start or end/stop. Matter and non-matter in the now are a continuing action inorder to now remain still. In other words, matter's existence involves actual stablization which makes them a factual action. Remaining is an action, is it not?

So because of action there is no "am" or "be" of any person or thing. Consider them murdered from your realizations of actualities. Only a place "be". We are just an action occupying the place that "be".

 

Add for the funk of it:

You know a word missing from dictionary is "actcome". "become" is in error because you cannot "be" ever if you weren't always a person that "be". So come be or be come (become) is in error. Place be, place didnt become. Hell, place lacks a will so it didnt even become us, even though we popped into it. We occupy a place, but we lack become it.

What do you want to become when you grow up? (Wrong!) It's: What do you want to actcome when you grow up?

If something 'be done', then it started and ended. So 'be done' is more like implying that a "be" was murdered from start to end in an instance of what is an act(ion).

When they say be you, they should rather say act you. Be real? No, act real. We didnt exist, no, we start existing. We live?, no, we "start to live". Dont let "to live" to a dictionary's "be" definition fool you because it makes it seem as though it's always.

When you see somebody you see an action. You're an action rather than a being. So what's up, my fellow human actions? Supreme or Higher Being? Naw, how about Supreme or Higher Action? At least we can tell a Higher Action isnt eternal to even begin to confuse us. "Supreme Being" been in error obviously to why it been leaving religion followers and atheists confused. Maybe they should teach Supreme (Higher) Action in schools instead of just God and religion and evolution and intelligent design.

 

The first basic two actions or dual actions concerning person and thing:

Start (begin) and last (hold, remain, endure).

^^Those actions together mean someone may start everlasting.

If you are a first, then that means you began and last.

The start is the Supreme Action and the last is the Higher Action. Yep, when you come to find out.

It isnt Highest Action with an est since action which start in general continues lacking a final action that can act concluded. You can never conclude you lived everlasting. You start everlasting you must continue for ever. It's as a void that can never be fulfilled. So there is nothing to conclude as a Highest Action if an action lacks completion in any way, shape, or form.

In the bible Jesus didnt say I am zero. For if Jesus said I am zero then it would mean Jesus is an eternal being. Jesus said I am Alpha...etc....first...etc. This concludes that existence isnt eternal. Non-existence (such as place which exists) is eternal with or without person or thing occupying it except it is not eternal with person or thing in position since person or thing popped into existing causes postion where there is then the here and the there beginning and ending. So place being eternal in all ways? No. So place being the Highest Be(ing)? No.

One of the specific actions is end (stop, expire, erase, delete, cease, vanish) of a person and thing.

It would act the opposite of Higher Action. So you should call it the Lower Action. It would act the same as Supreme Action only if it can cause something or someone not of the same source to end (stop, expire, erase, delete, cease, vanish).

The Lower Action comes in handy because you wouldnt want to make a mistake and have to live with it henceforth for ever. You wouldnt want to get trapped in a horrible way in any perspective and not be able to end what has you trapped or yourself even in an extreme case scenario.

 

Further expaining the principle of existence.

Principle- an accepted or professed rule of action or conduct: a person of good moral principles.

How can the start and lasting of an existence not imply it is an action in principle?

A car door that is a level of hard implies it along with it's hardness is an act(ion). Just because you dont feel it doesnt mean it isn't still acting hard.

I never heard of gravity sitting there present not performing. Everything now deemed existence is a performance. Performances are actions.

The color blue... It is doing something. Color blue wouldnt exist if it weren't "doing" something. "Doing" implies an action. By existing it is doing something. And if doing something is an action, and actions have a start, then that says even the things that were here before our existence all have a begin/start to them such as the color blue and energy.

They think energy cant be created. But do they mean created by something else (something already existing?) or do they mean it cant pop into existence by nothing at all? They are never clear because they obviously dont know jack by assuming out their butts. Humans couldnt be first so of course no one can do anything except assume energy cant be created. Anything that "be" of course cant have a beginning start. So rather they should say energy cant "act" created. Maybe it was created (as in popped into existence) to act like it was not created (as in popped into existence or created by someone/thing already existing) since we humans werent here eternally.

Ppl are so conditioned by the word be or being that they fail to realize act, acting, action, activity, activation. "Act" has "being" murdered in truth as you witness existence right infront of your face or experience existence. It aint even a way to not understand that existence is an act, acting, action, activity, activation rolled in one.

The activity of the color blue is and is definitely appearent by an action (call it human actings) that may witness and experience. The color blue doesnt witness or experience, but that dont mean it aint active since it has existence that is with start/begin.

How many actions does a chair have? It has a soft or hard action, it has a color action, it has a shape action, it has a position action (it doesnt just get up and walk away on its own), it has an endure action, and etc.

 

Beginning-
1. an act or circumstance of entering upon an action or state: the beginning of hostilities.
7. first; opening: the beginning chapters of a book.

^^So in the bible Jesus reffered his self as the first which means I stand correct that existence is not eternal. And since beginning an act(ion) it means any and every thing or one with a start is an act(ion).

Start-
1. to begin or set out, as on a journey or activity.
2. to appear or come suddenly into action, life, view, etc.; rise or issue suddenly forth.

^^If existence popped into existing, and no human could witness its to appear, then they have themselves as experiencers of the very "to appear" which is an action which then also says that persons are each an action.

Maybe if the word was actginning instead of beginning it wouldnt throw ppl off since be in beginning does not imply "be" in any way.

 

The difference between act and be are this.

Action = acting, performing something, doing something.

Being = actually becoming, becoming something real, eternal even. When they ask you, what do you want to become when your older, become is used in the sense of transforming and growth. A transition from your current "action" into something more. Taking that action and multiplying in/growing from it. Actually USING it to BE. Actions live in the moment, the present, being can be seen as an evolutionary term.

Knowing this, it IS possible to just "be", as we all ARE real, the AM and ARE is real.

To be is to grow and live life, continue on in the game of eternity.

I like how you think, but you go for the wrong ideas.