9/11 conspiracy- Don't know what to think.

well i was going to read the last 2 pages in this thread but it aint worth it with that bullshit sig pic takin up so much space...

geeze.. thats retarded...

 

Turn them off. It is worth reading through the thread.
Quite a few posers, but worth a read none the less.

 

LMAO I am so sorry, I forgot to resize it.

You sick ass hole.

 

thank you very much rayoflight.. i for one appreciate it..
odon its to much of a pain in the ass to switch it off just for one signature..

 

Yeah, I do appreciate that.
ROL110, was considerate enough to remove it.
Well done him, not like some of the fuckers around here, like me.

 

brand new,,well it is actually old i guess the guy had threats against him when it was to be included in loose change)but newly released video of more,,im sure some will say meaningless testimony about WT7..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRa....com/articles/june2008/062308_dead_bodies.htm

 

Conspiracy theorist! You have an inferiority complex! And I definitely have at least a rough understanding of what that means.

 

Dude, you are 27, get off your high-horse. First of all, who the hell are you to tell someone they are not wise? Do you know the person? Secondly, it is just this kind of attitude that contributes to arguments and hatred. Just because you are 10 or 11 years older than someone doesn't automatically make you some sort of knowledge guru. By mentioning that you don't listen to people just because of their age, you have essentially branded yourself an ignorant, close minded fuck. I don't use ignorant often, and I use close minded even less, but you really qualify by saying soemthing like that. Saying you wont listen to a 6 or 12 year old is one thing, because by that time, most people can't and/or don't think for themselves or develop ideas about important issues, but a 16 year old is perfectly capable of having valid ideas. Hell, even 6 and 12 year olds can have valid ideas. the point is you should not disregard what soemone says just because you feel that your age sets you on a higher plane of understanding than them. To make an informed descision about whether or not to take someones thoughts seriosuly, you must first listen to them and hear what they have to say, regardless of age.

 

ROFLMAO

I'm so sorry, that must have been so annoying with my sig picture. I thought it would resize itself I didn't realize it would take up so much room.

LOL OMG I can't stop laughing about it.

'That bullshit signature' lol omg

 

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=loose+change&hl=pl&sitesearch=#

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnQTcLHaMM&feature=related

 

What's your point in relation to the thread?

A lot of people are aware of what's going on their.

Which is largely the government sponsoring militias. A lot of it is also capricious spending, and still more invested in technology.

 

That story was aired the day before 9/11. It likely would have been huge news that week hadn't it been for the attacks the following day. We are talking about trillions of dollars literally missing from the Pentagon. People should look into a man named Dov Zakheim. He was the Pentagon comptroller at the time.

 

The point is you aren't allowed to fly over the White House either, but people do it all the time.

Have a look at this map.

The flight path of one of the runways of Reagan National Airport leads directs over the Pentagon. Its a little over half a mile away, about 10 seconds at approach speeds (much less at the speed 911 jets were approaching).

Yet you still claim nobody could violate Pentagon airspace. Maybe its time you provided something to back this up?

 

It seems the official stance of the US government about the plane that crashed into the pentagon was that it "vapourised" ... leaving no trace whatsoever.
Do some people honestly believe this!? Get real!

How come the plane that crashed into the trade center didn't also 'vapourise'?
Also i understand that the trade center was built to withstand exactly this kind of attack ...yet somehow it failed miserably ...the whole thing crashing completely to the ground.

It's nonsense.

 

No, no one claimed that the plane vapourised:

http://911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html

 

So how come i heard on the news reports that it vapourised leaving no trace?

Also in only three of those pics do i see the pentagon ...the rest could be from anywhere. Yes i see debris on the ground in front of a shattered building front. But what is the debris ... building debris or plane debris?

 

I don't know what news report you heard it on, but it was wrong. You may have seen a quote from the CNN broadcast taken out of context:

Jamie Mcintryre, CNN correspondent

"From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed." - CNN (09/11/01)

On the photo point, this paragraph from another site covers it:
[SIZE=+1]The recent Pentagon crash discussion on Rense.com has almost entirely focused on photos of plane debris on the lawn. Since most of the plane reportedly entered the building, we should also look for images of debris inside the building. Unfortunately, such images are very hard to come by since: (1) Much of the debris was burned and torn beyond recognition, (2) Most FEMA photos in the public domain were taken on 9/14/01, after much of the debris was cleared out of the building, (3) Most other photos remain in the private hands of investigators, rescue workers, and others who were inside the building. Many images are officially classified.

http://rense.com/general32/phot.htm




[/SIZE]

 

Well it's a huge discussion i'm not particularly familiar with, but i would say this; Which sources are to be believed ...if any. The news? Government spokespeople? Experts? Eyewitnesses? Conspiracy theorists? Everyone has their position to defend and everyone can be bought or 'persuaded'.
I think it's a case of believe what you want to believe because the truth doesn't seem to be forthcoming.

 

Can't believe people still believe this crap.