Who are biased against Ron Paul for not being up to par with other candidates due to your only source of politics being the corporate media.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iW5kOB1pmg
Hey,the democrats are going to nominate a pretty poor candidate Obama,when they had Edwards who is great.As far as the republicans I do not follow the party that nominated Bush.Americas long drawn out media driven electoral process has become a joke,and the laughing stock of the free world.
great video.. i doubt it will change most heres opinions though.. it seems to me there is a very strong socialist overtone here and that plays directly into the democrats hands.. therefore, anyone with that kind of mentality is scared shitless by ron pauls political platform....
I think Ron Paul would be great for the illegal alien problem.I am rather surprised he did not catch on more.
he is still very much in peoples minds as a write in candidate come november.. while the media does its best to squash him i feel he will wind up with at least 10% of the vote come november,which isnt bad considering the main stream mentality that if you dont vote for one of the 2 front runners your just waisting your vote.. i feel that your vote is your statement and i plan on making mine known...
Yep,the media did try to keep Ron Paul quiet in this so-called country.The media also gave Obama and Hillary a free ride.
The thing is, Ron Paul stands no chance of winning. Even if he did somehow win the majority vote, they would never let him into office, that is considering he is truly legit.
I don't like people who call others brainwashed... it just makes you look like an extremist, thinking is brainwashed because they have an opposing standpoint is just arrogant and narrow sighted
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm ...isn't Jerry Day part of the media? People always act like the media is one big entity that is serving it's own purpose. Yes there are biases in the mainstream media, and candidates have supporters who give them a lot of money so that they can put up TV ads and create their own propaganda. How much has Ron Paul raise from his supporters who want him in office? I'm not saying I like the system... there need to be changes.. but what are you going to do? What am I going to do? Whats the plan? Obviously, if I vote for Ron Paul what will happen? I voted for Nader, I try to vote for every third party candidate. What can I do? They can't raise the money that wins this capitalist country and I can give what I have and vote... what else? I know Ron Paul can't do it.. He isnt even in the public eye like Nader was... Who is endorsing Paul? Where is he speaking? Where does his ad revenue go?
The obvious conclusion is that Ron Paul supporters should try voting in primaries and sending his campaign money rather than making YouTube videos and whining on internet forums. But that's the key flaw of Ron Paul's strategy - his core constituency is people who think voting is rigged and there's no point to it. Get 100% of that group's support and what do you have? Nothing.
So if I google someone's name that means I must obviously support them and plan to vote for them? That video made some ridiculous assumptions, but I do like how it proved how easily a lot of people are influenced by the media. Saying that google hits = popularity is such an inane thing to argue. People hear all this talk about Ron Paul so they want to see what the big deal is so they go online and google his name and read his website and that's all. Saying that all those who search for him are supporters is idiotic. -Mike