Israeli Army Radio: Bush to attack Iran before Election Day

No surprises here. Right?

http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/17541/Israeli_Army_Radio_Bush_to_attack_Iran_before_Election_Day




x

 

Wouldn't surprise me. What does surprise me is it hasn't already. Congress doesn't seem to be focussed on it. They've done nothing to reign in his executive orders or demand full disclosure. What have you heard about his promise to the Saudis to provide them with enriched uranium for power plants? Or congress taking action to prevent that?

 

If only America did not get involved,Iraq and Iran would be a war with EACH OTHER.And that would be a good thing.So Bush and his handlers are in a way responsible for Iran possibly having nukes.

 

Soon we will be responsible for the Saudis having them. Brush has agreed to them acquiring enriched uranium.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/5/20/as_us_threatens_iran_over_enriching

I wonder what we get in return?

 

again you are just making wild claims.... we are giving them reactor grade uranium, so they do not have to build their own centrifuges, so they will not have the capacity to enrich to weapons grade, we are giving them 4-5% u-235, and there is a difference between reactor grade uranium and weapons grade, weapons grade is about 90% u-235, get your facts straight

 

maybe if the basic facts had been found america wouldn't be fighting a war in the middle east.

i wish you well with your new war

 

Aren't the Iranians stating that they are only interested in developing nuclear reactors for the production of electricity? Why are they a threat and the Saudis who piloted the planes on 9/11 aren't? And why are we giving the Saudis anything with their attitude towards us concerning petroleum.

If you think the Saudi interest in nuclear power is completely innocent try this article:

http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/afx/2006/03/28/afx2629000.html

 

NO! Iran is stating they want to Master the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, the "Enrichment of Uranium".

Why the development of NEW Centrifuges?
IR-2

Why kick out IAEA inspectors?





If that is their only interest, why keep the IAEA in the dark?


And why do they "IRAN" keep lying to their people about it .

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=169878


When clearly, the opposite is true,

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-06/02/content

_8297032.htm

We aren't "giving" them anything, we're SELLING them Low Enriched Uranium.Reactor grade, not Bomb grade.
Just like they SELL us oil.

And thats the funny part, You believe Saudis have other interest that aren't "innocent" just because you found "1" article by a German magazine saying so, Even tho they offered no proof, just hearsay.


Yet, you don't even give ANY of the IAEA reports "with more than enough proof" a second glance, and still defend IRAN on its "Innocent Quest"

 

^ also, even if there was the threat of them trying to build nukes... by giving them slightly enriched uranium, they will be able to fuel their reactors and produce nothing but energy,if we did not, they would say in order to attain fuel they would have to build their own centrifuges, which would result in them having the capacity to enrich to weapons grade, the Iranians, have a secretive nuclear program, and are essentially telling the world to trust that they will not enrich to weapons grade

 

^also, Iran could buy Reactor Grade Uranium from Russia and France, far cheaper than they can produce it.

 

Given the closeness of the Bush family and the Saudi royal family, odds are good that Bush has already given them an arsenal of various live nukes.

 

Except, Bush and Family don't have ANY live nukes to give, other that that yea, sure arsenal, why not.