The Moon Landings Were A Hoax!!:

Nah I was there, watching them when they landed in my back yard. That was real.

 

Anyone who thinks that the moon landing was hoaxed has never actually done their OWN research. Why no stars in the sky? First imagine how bright it is to stand on the moon, 2, the cameras can't adjust to pick up the stars. Then they mention the radiation belt, well what they don't mention is that you would have to stay in the belt for around a month for it to actually hurt you in any way. Yes they got a dose of radiation, but only for I think 2 hours.


If anyone has any reason why they think that the moon landing was a fake, just ask me and I'll tell you why it wasn't a fake.

 

The reason no stars are in the photos is due to the fact that the cameras were set up to take images of the surface, not the sky. We weren't there to photograph stars.

Try this non believers. Get a manual camera, set it to take daytime photos. Say F2, 1/500 to 1/1000 shutter speed. Then go out on a clear night, aim the camera up and snap off a shot. Result? NO STARS.

Stars at night with a regular manual camera require time exposures. Anywhere from around 20 seconds to 30-40 before Earth motion blurrs the stars, wide open app. I used to do a lot of basic astrophotgraphy years ago.

 

Wikipedia quote:

"In some regards,Lunar rocks are closely related to Earth's rocks in their composition of the element 'Oxygen' ".


-Moon-rocks have properties similar to those found on Earth- what a co-incidence!??.

 

No they don't. There are no rocks on Earth like moon rocks. Never trust Wiki completely.

 

Russia wanted to beat USA to the moon, so they would have been listening in on the radio when NASA was talking to the astronauts. If the radio signal came from somewhere that wasn't the moon, do you really think that Russia would have kept quiet about it ?

 

Another excellnet point. Russia would have LOVED to prove it a fake.

 

Or it could be most scientist think the moon was formed from parts of the earth after a giant meteor crashed into us billions of years ago.

 

why shoudl i give a shit if they landed on the moon, im not a astronaut thats not in my field of worries, if they lied about it well guess what they lie about a lot of shit, landing on this moon-star u speak of isnt going to make any different.
and btw its not a star a star is a ball of gas like the sun which would kill you because of the heat.

 

Are You Fuckin Kidding Me!!!! You Do Realize We Have A Space Station!!!! (with People In It) That Means We Can Build A Station In Space But Not Go The Extra Distance To The Moon???!?!?!? O And Distance Is Not An Issue Once Your In Space Its Getting Out There And Time To Get There! And Why The Hell Would We Be Tryin To Go To Mars!!!! Hey The Earth Is Actually Flat!!!!!! Have You Ever Seen It!!?!?!? All The Pics Of It Are Just Computer Genorated !

 

That's an old and flawed claim. The trajectory of soil kicked up on the Moon appears different compared with that on earth due to the acceleration due to gravity on the Moon being about 1/6th that on the earth. The trajectories seen in the Moon videos are consistent with that weaker gravity. Slowing down a video made on the earth wouldn't make the shape of the trajectories seen in the Apollo videos.

.

 

Agreed. Slow motion does NOT distort body mass, it only effects movement.

 

yeap...

 

i am not even going to bother reading this, but i can understand why people believe some of these conspiracy theories.

but not this one..

 

were all in the matrix anyway, so it dose not matter.

 

An Arial photo of Area-51 was superimposed onto a picture supposedly taken on the surface of the moon by the apollo astronauts and it was an exact match

The photo taken by the apollo astronauts was a fake



http://youtube.com/watch?v=7qKcJF4fOPs&feature=related


Hotwater

 

If you never believe a word the federal government says and in fact assume the opposite is true you will be correct most of the time.

Yes we have the space station now but in the 1960's the most powerful computers out there were punch card sorters and magnetic tape readers.

And the abacus.

That is no where near the technology necessary to launch and land and blastoff and meet up with the orbiter and then make it back to sweet home Earth. No way.

Much as I'd love to believe we were there...it just ain't so folks.

Sure was a great PR stunt tho so hat's off to the the Nixon boys.

 

And, you know all this how? We went, we landed. Deal with it. Yes your cell phone has more computing power than the Apollo computer did. We had the technology, the Russians at the time would have LOVED to prove it a hoax.
My uncle helped wire the LEMS. He wasn't part of "the hoax". THOUSANDS of people worked on those missions.

You have a LOT to learn yet kiddo.

 

Bart Sibrel gave Neil Armstrong the opportunity to swear on the Bible that he walked on the Moon.He refused:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu6KN89seAs

 

Swearing on the bible is like swearing on a nursery rhyme. They're both made up stories.

We went, deal with it.