Anti-Gravity/ The Energy Machine

The worst part was at first I thought you were talking about hadrons, and then I got my particle physics all messed up, and confused hadrons with muons, and I thought muons were the particles that have a decay time on the order of milliseconds, and then I realized I was reading it wrong.

But, are hadrons only named so because the guy who discovered them had a hardon at the time but that didnt have the ring of a particle name?

And, I felt obligated to check, and the greek "hadros" means thick.

 

gravity is weak.

 

Hearts

You confused a Hardon with a muon.
THAt has to go down in history.. LOL
Actually i wondered when posting if any would 'see 'hadron' not hardon.
The old pass the message trick at parties.

Man i had one HUGE hardon for Lisa Farrah.. she knew it too. and bent over desk one row up to show white panties... oiooooooooooohohoohhhhh

Occam

 

Dave

And thats what makes 'holes' so intersting.
A 'weak' force.
Obliterates all that comes near.
Magnetism we might comprehend in empirical way.
You can SEE iron filaments moving in field.
But gravitics is 'weak'. That ones physical body is actually bending space. is a hard one to encompass.This is why concept is vital.
I cannot begin to express my desire to increase the bounderies of the
concept called singularities
The earth.. Makes a dimple. SOL makes a pit.
M82 makes an abyss
"Look not too long into the abyss, or you might find it looking back at you."
Scary stuff
The concept of holes frightens me .. the only thing that does.
This truely is the 'edge' of our understanding.
As it seems the horizon. Is the edge of our universe.

And yes i know. that some will say i've watched 'event horizon'
too many times..yeh.. good movie, Crap physics.
[i can list from memory all logical errors.. can you?
[Note one.. there was no 'event horizon' Thus the movie should have been called 'How laurance fushburn maintains cohesion.]

Quizz question. Closest known hole to SOL.

occam

 

Muons do have a very short decay time of about 2 microseconds in the rest frame of the muon. This is actually very long in terms of particle physics, because the muon can only decay via the weak interaction.

Conversely not all hadrons decay at all, the proton for example has not been observed to decay at all. The current experimental limit for its decay time is about 10^34 years, about 10^24 times longer than the current age of the universe.

 

Tony

for all proton decay. [if such IS]
I speculate it at 100 to 300 billion years.. but im just an autodidact.
Persoanally i expect universal collapse at the end of that period..
all that remains.. the holes.. will fall together.

Occam

 

Damn the Friedmann equations

 

yes equations are descriptions...
If it has not happened [yet]. equations are not even that.
they are speculation

HAS a proton decayed...?
Not that any human has seen.
We are real good at shortlife phenomena using colliders.
But longlife, we are too shortsighted/preconditioned to admit ignorance.

 

Due to quantum physics gravity is not any kind of energy. Any mass is curving 3-dimensional Kartesian space. So it is rather spacetime curvature not a force:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

No mass - no gravitation - antygravitation do not exists - even for antymatery.

 

Thanks man, electrocosmology at least explains eliptic move of comets!

 

Anti-gravity technology has been around since at least the 30's. We know the Nazis had such technology to propel their flying disks, and it has since been passed on to the US.

 

So called 'anty-gravity' is in fact just a magnetic field. See this funny article:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/antigravityworldgrid/ciencia_antigravityworldgrid12.htm

Such thing like relation opposite to gravity cannot exist due to the nature of phenomenon of gravitation.
Why? Because gravitation is not a force. In fact it is ilusion. How?
Because of the time dilatation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

The planet goes straight ahead - but we see that it is circling because TIME GOES SLOWER THERE WHERE MASS EXISTS!!!!
And that's why we see that planet is curving thru the Sun diretion. In fact it is going staight ahead. From the same reason we feel that Earth is attract ourselfs.

 

Have a look at the John Benini motor,who did a machine to use a permanent magnetic energy...
My priority nr 1 is to make 1 too,like the guy at You Tube...

 

Astro

Yes and no..

objective law is that gravition is X
But there is no law that says objective law cannot be slighted
or even circumvented.

Dilation is aspect of X, it does not mean X is inviolate.
[tho dilation 'is' the most fascinating thing in reality]

occam

 

You' re right Razor;
Prof. Subrata Roy from University of Florida applied for a patent of WEAV magnetohydrodymaical object of width 15 centimeter using plasma.
Probably something similar to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnVg_u5L0Uc&feature=related

 

MagnetoHydroDynamic is fluid theory..[aka Tunnel or worm drives in applied]
not sure how that applies to dilation but hey
the utube clip was cool.

occam

PS.. And the word is ace...
Girl in bar. '"what do you do" she says..
Im a Magnetohydrodynamicist...

LoL

 

See this film:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sABpGFzxebQ&NR=1
it is film made about Germans project in Sudety mountains that probably was base for the later Roswell flying sources project.
Very good shots from underground tunnels.

 

i may have created a machine that does create an (almost) infinite momentum with magnets, possibly creating antigravity. if anyone can tell me where i could get something like this looked at by serious scientists and patent it as my idea that would be great. i am only 17 btw is there any limitations because of age?

 

Wow man! Show the photos of your invention. I really wonder how it works.
I'll try to find some articles for you. Age has no meaning for inventors.

Back to the conception of antygravity. If someone will create such electromagnetic field that is exactly opposite to Earth magnetic field such machine would be able to fly on that field. The problem is that Earth field is very weak and that's why it may not be possible to create field generator that is light enough to fly.

 

i'd rather not show pics incase anyone tries to steal it but i can tell u basically how it works. it's a circle with magnets on the inside of it. these magnets spin a magnetized ball coming off a rod in the center. i'm not gona give all the details but if magnets run out of power then that's not good because thats how it works. either way, i could get it to last as long as the magnets do, and possibly get it spinning up to speeds thought impossible by humans (as it does increase speed over time) which could possibly, even a small one, create so much momentum that it would fly off the ground. i thought if i put it on the bottoms of chairs and had a detector that made sure it was always 2 feet off the ground, then we could have floating chairs. not exactly anti-grav, but it's like a superior form of the helicopter. the germans may have created something like this in ww2 but i'm not sure. i know they had flying saucers (look it up). btw astrolog thanks for tryin to help if u could get an expert that would talk with me that would be great. but how come u hate the all seeing eye? if u hate the way america is right now i understand that completly i consider myself and advocate of a better living standard as well. anyway, :cheers2: