Future of survival in nuke strikes

Who are they fooling

A bunker with food for 1-3 months for a person capacity of 1-3 thousand of important government officials wouldnt withstand a nuclear war because each country knows how long it would take to set off additional rounds of nukes, correct?

So the only top persons of importance would indeed have to try to make it in the air in a flight to another country, and it would have to be just before nukes strike before they can even get off the gound in an aircraft. So the only way for just of course the top officials to survive would be leave the country before making a first strike, or else, all measures would fail. I think countries would know this already, but as long as they see the particular region they attack not regaining a power hold by those officials, who may get away, they could care less.

What do you think?

By the way, if the president wont give you a warning that they themselves are about to strike first with nukes, so that you, knowing there would be a retaliation of nukes hitting back, may get a chance at fleeing the country, then that shows your president doesnt care about any of you non-officials. And if you made it to another country, where no money was provided by the president to the escapees for you to live there for a time, then you will end up getting arrested for a kind of survival that would indeed kick in no matter what your morals or conscience said.

 

obviously any kind of nuclear strike against another nation is going to trigger apocalyptic consequences, most likely for the whole world.

I've been inside caves in Europe where the american military stores a lot of equipment. it's hard to imagine without seeing, but "huge" is a good word to describe it. supplies and vehicles, as far as the eye can see. so yes, they most definitely have caves and bunkers prepared in the event of some major catastrophe, like a nuclear war.

 

Switzerland is sadly, fucked.....badly.

Some of the nordic countries could be pretty well off depending on where the wind blows that day, if it blows South, Norway and Sweden are Okay.

Australia, well central Australia should be solid, New Zealand is fucked because of the tidle waves that would come.

Northern Canada should be okay but it depends on the winds and where the Nukes explode, I mean Yukon seems pretty solid depending on where the nukes fall in Alaska and again, the wind.

Japan is sooooooooooooooooooooooo fucked, again, kinda sad cause they're peacefull and have much to offer.

Central Africa is good, but 90% of the people probably want to die already.

 

wouldnt everyone be fucked? if one country launched nucear bombs, another one would and all the countries allies would be launching them too. subsequently producing so much waste in the atmosphere blocking the sun, and then going into the next ice age/

 

nuke strikes are a long shot. who actually will launch them? packistan? the u.s.?

i don't know of anyone else in this world irresponsible enough to do so. and how many does packistan have? what ways to launch them? and how far?

no. the real danger, the biggest danger, is what the comodifying of everything is motiving to do to the environment we all depend upon.

and THAT is a proccess that is already going on. (and one which the 'western/northern' powers, the u.s. at their head, are more responsible for then anyone else)

=^^=
.../\...

 

Well, I mean North Korea has what, 2 nukes?

Iran could only produce a few, and they'd be small.

I mean you're looking at Central Europe which doesn't have nukes nor is in any extreme confrontation with the hostile BIG NUKE countries, which are Russia, U.S. and China.

France and the U.K. probably wouldn't launch many nukes.

In fact, what would probably most likely happen is most of the EU would declare neautrality and wouldn't be as heavily affected.

Then you factor in South America...in what circumstance do THEY get bombed??? Most of the countries don't like the U.S. or have significant relations with China or Pakistan.

I mean really, the hotspot for a nuclear war would be:

North America, mainly U.S. and Suuthern Canada ( because of close proximaty ) and Asia.

This isn't Pre-World War I where ike 5 countries controlled all of the world's territories.

 

the biggest, and probably only, danger from nuclear weapons, is some retarded right wing american president launching them just because he wants to play with the damd things, or in a petty tif of vengence against the head of some poor little podunc country that tries to defend its environment and its people from the rapacity of international corporatocracy.

=^^=
.../\...