http://www.votenader.org/media_press/index.php?cid=147 Nader's absolutely right. I just can't support Kerry anymore. http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0924.html Not after all this. He just keeps making more and more decisions like these. He's lost what little respect I had for him.
Well its quite obvious that Kerry and Bush were both handpicked by the illumanati to be a puppet for them. No matter who you vote for, Kerry or Bush, the Military Industrial Complex is still in power, to do whatever they want. The one time somebody had the balls to stand up to the military industrial complex and put an end to their insanity, he was assasinated at Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963, and ever since then they have made sure that NOBODY that becomes president will question their authority. America is slowly becoming a dictatorship hidden under the guise of a republic, when you have the choice between two dictators, it's still a dictatorship. Peace and Love, Dan
If they are the same, why is the Republican Party helping Nader get on the ballot. Republicans want hippies to be apathetic and docile. They also want to pull liberal votes away from Kerry. Don't be stupid, there is a difference. It may not be as big as you like, but you can bet anyone running against Bush is better. John Kerry is losing in the polls against Bush because Kerry is perceived by the average voter as being too liberal.
Yes, with the understanding that it would ONLY be when all diplomatic and investigative options were exhausted (which, of course, they were not.) I have NEVER seen a politician I agree with 100%. I am going to have disagreements with Kerry, but he is still the ONLY person who can get Bush out of the White House. He will also do a good job as President. I can't imagine Nader, with his constant adversarial attitude getting ANYTING done in Washington. It would be like when Harold Washington was Mayor of Chicago (I lived there then) his continual adversarial-ism made it impossible for any decisions or progress to happen. It was a waste of time and money, to be president you have to KNOW how to negotiate, you have to know how to deal with Congress, you have to KNOW how to get things done. And Nader can and would do none of these things. Not to mention that he will NEVER win. I don't understand voting for someone who has NO chance, has taken money from the ENEMY, and has NO interpersonal skills or no idea how to make things work in a VERY important job. I am a realist. Nader cannot win, he cannot administrate, (he can't even get along with people, look at the Green party and that fiasco, that happens whenever people try to deal with him) it is a LOST cause. SO WHAT if you agree with what he says? He is still a spoiler and will INSURE Bush's presidency. I can't live with the fact that I helped that happen.
Yeah, and the automotive industry has killed the guy who invented the auto engine which runs on water and hid the plans in a "secret vault".......and there are aliens living in Area 54......and the Bush family are reptiles from Outer Space.......and a girl I know had colony of spiders living in her Beehive hairdo in the 60s and they ate into her brain......and Kennedy is being kept alive in a "secret location" in DC, along with Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa........ Sheesh.
And from where exactly are you getting this? Nader works his ass off for his campaign every election year, no matter how tough things look or how slim his chances appear to be. That doesn't stop him; he works hard for that in which he believes. Yeah, you're right. He never will win if people like you keep that attitude. He would have a chance if more of the liberals who like him and agree with his policies would actually go out and vote for him. But just like you, they all keep the mindset that it will never happen, which is true, ironically enough, because of them. He would have a great deal of people voting for him if they actually voted for what they really believed in and stopped settling for less. Why choose the lesser of the two evils? You may be a realist, and maybe I'm an idealist, but that doesn't change the fact that it is not impossible. One vote might not change the world, but at least it's a start. That builds support, and eventually numbers do add up. It looks like Bush will win either way, so why not use your vote to support the REAL candidate? Well, at least I can sleep at night knowing that I'm doing what is right. I'm not selling out, or lowering my standards to support someone with whom I wholeheartidly disagree, just because I dislike Bush.
All you do is post insults and scarcasim. You never provide any useful information or conversation on any topic. Where's Max with his "Don't Feed the Trolls" picture when ya need him...
