It should be interesting to see how the topics of Hipforums are affected. Bush has been in office for nearly 8 years, and has been one of the main source of topics in the politics and America attacks forums.
Because the libs are as brainwashed and polarized as their neocon counterparts, they could have a Democrat in office who follows almost the exact same policies as Bush, but will not speak out against that person, simply because they have a D instead of an R next to their name. This will happen. Mark my word. Little will change in terms of policy, but the public outcry is likely to be much less than it already is. The libs, who are already clueless when it comes to how the system works, will lay down and go back to sleep once they believe one of their own is in office. It is amazing how group think and use of the dialectic works so well in controlling the public. People have no clue. Like sheep, the people can be expected to join one side or the other, not knowing (or simply not wanting to know) that both teams are owned by the same group of people. Little do they know that one of the biggest war-mongering criminals in the world is behind the campaign of their beloved candidate, who speaks endlessly about the "change" he is going to bring if (s)elected by his elite globalist handlers.
"There are a lot of very brilliant people who believe that the nation-state is fast becoming a relic of the past," President Clinton, New York Times, November 25, 1997 Read Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley. He was a professor at Georgetown University, CFR historian and deeply influenced Bill Clinton (Clinton mentions him in various speeches). So go ahead, see what Quigley has to say about politics, see what the man who inspired Clinton has to say in Tragedy and Hope. it is a good read, I would highly recommend you do the....research. Here I'll help: "The chief problem of American political life for a long time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international. The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy." -Carroll Quigley – Tragedy and hope "The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups." -Professor Carroll Quigley, 1966 Yup, says Clinton's mentor, who choose him as a Rhodes scholar...all found through research....right from the horses mouth. And that oh so great Brzezinski who will be advising a man who will indeed bring about great change! "This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept." Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter But I guess JFK says it best (and you can easily find it in audio format) just before he was killed: "The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people, inherently and historically, oppossed to secret societies, secret oaths, and secret proceedings. For we are oppossed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence. It depends on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly effecient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published, its mistakes are buried, not headlined, its dissenters are silenced, not praised, no expendature is questioned, no secret is revealed... I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people." -JFK, 1961 I mean for cripes sake man, it is all out there! There is NO DIFFERENCE between the parties, they are controlled by the same handlers at the top. ....But I guess ad hominem is an okay refute for you judging by what you said to Matt, so I don't know why I even bother.
