But there were, and all experts in the field disagree with you and your Alex Jones pamplets you rephrase and post. Of course anyone who disagrees is a government shill, so the reality doesn't matter to you, because it's not as intresting. I await your expert opinion on the color of the fire proving it was oxygen starved. *snicker*
Maybe Matty is lonely? S'okay. I'm a goddess. I can handle him. *hurls a lightening bolt and strikes lode down from his high hill* What's the beef? The man isn't always right - and you shouldn't get too offended by the ramblings, drooling and be forced to witness Matt's mental masturbation if someone mentions the word 'chemtrails'. I find it all rather endearing.
I could not give a crap less about Alex Jones, who is a sensationalist. I don't need for him to tell me what's visible with my own eyes and my own logic. And no, not ALL experts disagree with me. Even the people who designed the building said it was designed to take MULTIPLE hits from planes of comparable size to 757s. I suggest you watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW6Oez7pag0
It derails any political discourse if the same vapid accusations are brought up again and again, without a shred of evidence and insisted with conjecture rather then offered along with proof. I'd probably find it cute if I didn't waste too much time here.
But I do provide evidence. You just don't want to see it. You would much rather act on being cool and saying whatever most people will agree with (in other words, what people want to hear). Typical sheeple mentality. The fact is, "Lode," you are a repeater -- not a thinker. There are lots of repeaters in the world and you are one of them. You love to parrot and think you know everything, but what research have you done into anything? I do suggest you become an anchorman, though. I think you would be good.
Yes, Annie, I already told you what I believe. I can't help it if I didn't say what you want to hear... OK?
Heres a report saying that the port authority never performed a test of how the building would withstand a fire. http://select.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article&OQ=_rQ3D2Q26resQ3DF70915FA3D5B0C7B8CDDAC0894DB404482Q26orefQ3Dslogin&OP=615fe23Q2FxQ3FQ2BjxQ7DcpQ2BqQ271xupKqQ3BQ3BQ7DvxqVuIclQ2BQ3BVQ5EpQ2BupQ2BQ27xqVpcumQ2BrQ3BqsfIp1m Heres a commentary on the conspiracy claims from a demolition standpoint. http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf Heres some commentary from an onlooker who knew they would fall once hit. Heres the NIST technical overview of why the fires (not the planes) caused the collapse. http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-5index.htm Hers a 2D overview of a building frame under gravity load and fire. http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build04/art014.html Heres a report of the load bearing properties of different mateirials when exposed to that degree of heat, steel lasts 4 minutes compared to woods 9 minutes. http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire82/art020.html Heres several reports from engineers who know that fire brought the buildings down on how to reevaluate skyscrapers for fires after 9/11. http://www.fireox-international.com/fire/structdesfire.htm http://www.interactfire.co.uk/legislation.asp And heres a mathmatical model of the towers collapse. http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/seffen_simple_analysis.pdf
But I don't see where he answered mine. If he did, can someone repost the quotation? I just want some ideas on solutions...back to the original topic and discussion on hand. How many ADD kids does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Wanna ride bikes?
Yeah, Lode, I've already read the government's reports. You're not providing me with any new "evidence" I haven't already seen. For anyone who really cares about this, I suggest they watch this short clip consisting of firefighters and other emergency worker's testimony of the events immediately preceding the collapse of the World Trade Center. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deys8AxfVQw
Most people think that great minds think alike, few understand that great minds think for themselves. Figure it out Annie, you're smarter than you are stubborn.
Oh, it's this George Grie print. He's a surrealist artist I like. I suppose it's a very sexual and melancholic theme... I kinda think of introspection when I look at it.
You've read those other reports from engineers which I've posted as well. Just now, in these 6 minutes? A bit of a speed reader aren't you?