Eve of Destruction http://youtube.com/watch?v=bmysVoRBgyA who do you think is most likely to drag this country into another war? John McCain Mike Huckabee Barack Obama Hillary Clinton
I would say it's equal for them all since they have all been vetted by the same establishment they will be working for if selected by the elite to take office. It's almost certain Hillary will be the next president, and this is someone who is completely in bed with the neoconservatives, many of which are now calling for her over McCain to be the next president. Both Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter have said they will vote for Hillary over McCain. It's clear she is the anointed one.
the rat's probably right. i think obama might be the best chance of not staying bought though. like carter and in so many ways like jfk if he gets in. he's a bit of a wild card i think, enough to keep the usual puppet masters guessing at least a little bit. so i'd put him as the best chance not to. limbo is hillary's kiss of death, maybe that was his intention, but yes, she probably IS our next pres, and another beckey thatcher just as a guess. i think she'll pick edwards for veep. obama needs to, and i'm guessing will, if it is him, pick someone like kussenich for 'anti-assasination insurance, which of course, if he don't stay bought, as i'm hoping he might not, he'll almost certainly be needing, just from big oil, let alone the arms industry, as will anyone with half a conscience. the world hasn't completely ended yet, these ARE "interesting" times. i would peg the huck, as most likely to complete the colapse of the u.s. and with it, much of the international, 'economy'. but i don't think there's too much chance of him getting in, except maybe as mccain's veep. =^^= .../\...
McCain TV Ad : Never Surrender https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9dd6wnCawE John McCain himself declares emphatically in his own TV ad. "I will never surrender". It seems to me, that saying "I will never surrender" means, McCain is hinting that he will drag this country into more wars, even into World War III itself. McCain might very well be likened to a "Bush III".
McCain is a coward who refuses to answer questions about the attack on the USS Liberty.not only that, but he kisses the ass of the country that atacked the USS Liberty, it's sickening. he got better treatment than most POWs because his grandpa and his daddy happened to be admirals in the US navy.
Although he has different opinions from Bush on domestic issues, he criticized the surge in Iraq, claiming it was "too little." Yes, McCain is the warhawk of the group and I wouldn't be surprised if he wanted to go after Iran. I can't support someone who does not value the lives of innocent people. It seems that people are only numbers. Peace and love
how ironic, because Limbaugh used to constantly bash the Clintons every chance he got to do so. just goes to show the twop political parties really are two masks on the same face. i wish Rush Limbaugh would go away already. he almost makes me ashamed to be from Missouri. not only that, but he's been known to be a big supporter of the war on drugs and wouild badmouth ilicit drug abusers. but then he turns around and gets busted for pill related reasons not just once. but twice. though i'd have to say Michael savage is just as annoying as Rush Limbaugh is.
you forgot "all of the above" as an option. they all have the same basic interventionist foreign policy.
Yes, I agree, there should have been a "All of the above" option, but I'm unable to add that to the poll. Does anyone know how? However, amongst all the above presidential candidates, it is McCain who seem to be the most vocal and outspoken about getting this country into another war. One with Iran perhaps?
I think he's just more honest than the other ones about it. Clinton voted for the iranian resolution, Obama's comments about pakistan show us his true colors, and Huckabee has proposed carving up parts of Egypt or Saudi Arabia for land for the palestinians, can't have israelis give up anything it wouldn't be biblical . nuts, all of them.
yes, we can't have a bunch of ruskies, poles and ukranians being forced off of land that they forced others off of. now can we?
yep, they're looking for any excuse to invade and destroy Iran and any other country that is Muslim or defies the agenda of the USA or the UN. as i've said before in the past. Iran is as much a threat to the west as Rhode Island is a threat anyone in general.