http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,328967,00.html "The act also expanded the definition of terrorism to include 'domestic,' thus enlarging the number of activities to which the Patriot Act’s expanded law enforcement powers can be applied." Are you guys thinking what I'm thinking?
The link isn't working, but I already know about this. A few weeks ago, Fox News was saying that, according to MI5, al-Qaeda cells in Britain are recruitng white members to its group. A "white" al-Qaeda, they called it. They said that these people are likely to have no criminal background and are likely college educated. In other words, anyone could be a potential terrorist. Here is the link to the Fox News propaganda piece. Anti-terrorism manuels sent to local police by Homeland Security list potential terrorist suspects as being white men who wear t-shirts and jeans, and carry almanacs in their car. You see, it's intentionally very vague because now everyone is a potential terrorist, not just brown-skinned people of Middle Eastern descent. None of this anti-terrorism stuff was ever about going after so-called "al-Qaeda" terrorists because this notion of jihadist terrorism, as we are made to believe exists, is a complete myth. The real war is against anyone who asks questions and challenges the government's lies. If you question the government, you might be with al-Qaeda.
"this notion of jihadist terrorism, as we are made to believe exists, is a complete myth" Well I would agree that most of what is being done is unfair/has alterior motives, but to say that jihadist terrorism is a myth is just plain wrong altogether. Ask a relative of the London train bombs if its a myth, ask a 911 relative, its not a myth. It might not be behind even 20% of what the govt's say it is, but it does exist. Is it some all-powerfull enintity that has complete control over all terrorism and terrorists? No. But it is there, even if it is nowadays disorganized, it does exist. Also, the guy who planned the bombings of the London train bombs was a pledged follower/supporter of Al-Qaeda, so the arguement that the organization has no power anymore is not legitimate.
But not all the relatives of the victims of 9/11 and the London bombings are buying into the official version of what we were told happened. Anyone who looks at these events with the least amount of scrutiny can see that what we were told is a lie, as it always is.
wow, remember me saying how the definition of terrorist will be getting much vaguer? it begins now. pretty soon i think the internet will be regulated because its a potential threat for "homegrown terrorism".