"Four United Nations observers have been killed in an Israeli air strike on an observation post in south Lebanon" from the article/story.....http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5215366.stm (VERY VAUGE ARTICLE) Personally i believe that this was not a mistake based on the fact that the bombs that were dropped were said to be GPS Guided missiles, therefore i find it hard to believe that someone could accidentally target a BIG Fucking RED CROSS after being requested to stop the bombing so close to the U.N. headquarters, but failure to respond to the request says otherwise. some questions i would like to be answered : WHY WAS THE PILOT NOT QUESTIONED FOR HIS ACTIONS? WHY WAS ISRAL TOTALY DISMISSED OF ISSUE WITHOUT QUESTIONING OR DISCUSSION? WHY DOES THIS ARTICLE JUST LIKE MANY OTHERS LEAVE OUT VITAL DETAILS SUCH AS THE INFORMATION OF PILOT, GOVERNMENT DECISIONS AFTER EVENT? such vital questions that are left unanswered make it hard for me as well as many others to believe the BOMBING was an accident, JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED AND QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED. What are your opinions on this topic? What questions do you want answered?
WHY dont you look at the other active thread on this topic just a few posts down??? And WHY dont you educate yourself on the issue. Hamas specificly basses themselves near civillians so that they will make israel look bad when there are casulties. AND WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU LINKING TO A STORY FROM JULY 06????
The people responsible were questioned. There was a big investigation and the government decided that no wrong was done. Israel was dismissed because of several reasons. First of all, the UN observeres were standing dangerously close to a Hizbollah bunker. They were aware of the fact that they were standing near the bunker. Missiles tend to miss once in a while, modern warfare isn't some video game in which you just press the button and drop the bomb on the target. Second off, the UN is responsible for its members in the area. It's just as much its fault for not protecting them, and for stationing them in a dangerous area. No article would provide you with information about the pilot. The pilot has a right to privacy. Why do you want to know his name... just so that you could have another person to hate? Anyhow, I hope that I helped answer your question and provide you with some insight.
