This is THEORY based on part-theory and part-fact. Back when we were hunting willy mammaths (Fact, skeletons as proof in museums.) with spears Before complex sentences. Before a written language existed. Males had much more testosterone and were much more aggressive. Our chemistry was different. We could break a finger and feel about as much pain as a pinch on the arm that was hard enough to bruise the skin (Example, not precise obviously.) (I heard that on the discovery channel. Makes sense - we wouldn't of been able to deal with the harsh conditions and cold and rough surfaces if our pain recepters were the same as today - we were obviously mentally stronger too.) I think it is possible for sex to have been a much more violent predator-pray type of thing. Animals are less evolved (We are classified as animilia - eyes, nose, ears, teeth, tongue, salivia, skin, hair, nails, 4 limbs, 5 digits, blood, heart, organs, intestines, animals...) Some eat their young when they are weak. Some kill their mate (Lions sometimes kill the female during sex from aggression.) It is a chase in which the female usually refuses or puts up a fight. So in my theory, it was the same for us as we were much more animalistic and more in turn with our natural animal instincts. Thicker nails (claws) and stronger and harder enamel on the teeth. I think the beat-her-over-the-head-and-drag-her-unconcious-body-by-her-hair is/was true. Scientific facts prove the male brain is larger and that males control the world and always have. Females couldn't vote, get an education, leave the house, participate in events, and others not too long ago. We have always been the controlling force since the beginning of time - and in other countries it is more true than in America the land of the free. I think female death resulting in the chase or the actual aggression of the male during sex or after was common. I think sex only lasted 1 or 2 minutes with about 10 thrusts, maybe less. The male probably foamed at the mouth. Biting and clawing and hitting and fighting was probably part of nature. It is the same today with many other animals. The female puts up a fight and in a lot of cases she is forced to get pregnant even though the female instincts told her that the male wasn't strong enough. That is my theory. It makes sense. Obviously the male didn't approach the female with kind hearted intentions and speak to her with such a small vocabulary...unable to form a sentence. She more than likely ran or refused in most cases. Though I'm sure few times the female was the aggressor to a male who wouldn't have her for whatever reason. She was probably attacked in these cases or forced away. Males have always been the hunters as far back as history records and farther. Females have been the gatherers. King and queen days...indian tribes...romans...greeks... country folk' in recent times. The female depended on the male for survival. And for everyones information. The male has the baby. The actual child is in the male semen - the women just has a womb/egg. Females are not the giver of life. Males are. Females are the holder of life, males are the giver. We give a child to the female egg for her to hold. She gives birth to a child that we gave here, therefore life comes from the man. I know, it is both man and women who together give life - but it is often confused that "Women are the giver of life" and "Women create life" I think the truth should be exposed that man is the giver of life and creator of life. I think the men and women who say things like "Women are the giver of life" and "my mother gave me life" should instead say "my father gave me life" Man is God. The creator of life. God makes man in his image (his son) End of post before I get in trouble =X
