If i take the tobacco out of a cig

and i replace it with weed...

about how many grams would that be?

 

wont be much..i do it all the time and lets say i get around $20 worth of some mid stuff..i can fill around 2-3 cigarettes just make sure you take out the filter before you smoke

 

Why? I'd keep the filter on. Everyone that says the filter will absorb the THC is crazy. You get baked. Trust me.

 

cut like half of the filter off....maybe it will abosorb less THC??...idk man prolly shouldnt listen to me

 

how much is 20 worth of mids where u live....

cuz around here thats like 1-2 grams

 

Keeping the filter on is completely ridiculous when you can make a roach out of practically anything.

A cig will hold just about as much as a joint, so around 1 gram... depending on how tight you stuff the fucker.

But, I'll stand by the fact that the filter absorbes some of the THC.

 

thank you sir for answering my question haha

 

yeah, me and a couple friends were able to stuff a little more than a nick into a cig once. a nick around here ($5) is 1 gram. But it really all depends on how tight you pack it.

And I agree with BraveSirRubin. Take the filter off. we smoked three cigs full of weed and barely got anything out of it.

 

Considering I get JUST AS BAKED when I leave the filter on Im going to call bullshit and say its a placebo affect you're feeling.

 

You can call bullshit all day hombre.

Everyone knows that the filter gets in the way. I was 15 once and tried to leave the filter in... not a good idea.

Maybe it's all just a placebo effect in ya Them receptors in your head might just be broken and maybe just maybe you don't get high at all and it's all just a placebo.

Ridiculous argument, ain't it? So is yours.

 

men,I've done both ways and I still got high as fuck. Both have its pluses, using a Newport with filter makes it taste delicious but then again Mary jane is delicious. Roaches are always a plus in my book.

 

I don't think I agree with your logic here, his claim isn't really that irrational. I don't see why cigarette filters would be absorbing THC -- I don't see the grounds for which why THC would be absorbed by the filter, unless the filters are designed to absorb chemicals like THC.. which are being transfered through smoke of all things. I've smoked a cigarette joint thing before with the filter on -- worked fine for me, trust.

And then what would be the point of a cigarette joint if you remove the filter.. I mean if the reasoning is to be discrete.. without the filter it no longer looks like the common brown/white cigarette.

 

No, the filter absorbs THC, I am by no means denying that (at the same time it filters a lot of other things out as well which is good). However, Im just saying that the amount of THC absorbed imo is not noticable enough for me to stop using a cig filter (which I RARLEY do as I don't smoke). My filters come in folded cardboard.

 

Yeah, I'm not really gonna argue here because I don't really give a shit.

It probably depends on the type of filter and stuff as it is.

I remember when I was a kiddo, one of the first times I've ever smoked with mates... we didn't remove the filter... still got hiiiiiigh... but then we tried to smoke without the filter the next day... and man... and I say man... seriously... man.

 

Haha, fucking idiots using manufactured cigarettes to split open and stick in joints!!!
If you MUST smoke unfiltered tobacco, then for fuck's sake use a shred of common sense and buy RYO tobacco.
It is well documented that pre-rolled manufactured cigarettes contain a number of chemical adulterants (ammonia, pesticides, benzene, cadmium, etc) for varying reasons (keep cigarette burning, retain flavour/density, etc) - adulterants you won't find in RYO tobacco! (Probably adding to the ridiculous prices of the more well known brands).
Only yesterday I compared research and American Marlboro reds, and found they use 'freebased nicotine' in their cigarettes (which speeds up and increases impact of nicotine delivery in the system); WHAT they use to freebase the nicotine probably causes even more physical harm.
The above is aimed at the following.
I won't go near manufactured cigarettes as it is; they don't even taste of TOBACCO, for fuck's sake!! They just taste chemical, messed with, nasty. The smoke is much thicker and toxic compared to RYO smoke; and they taste harsher than a Camel's (no pun intended) arse even WITH the filter.
Ripping the filter off and sticking the contents in a spliff opens you to all these adulterants (added for whatever excuses the company decides to mask them with), unfiltered. It also makes your spliffs burn quicker (you can chill with a spliff for much longer with RYO tobacco), gets too harsh too quick, tends to sideburn, burns more rapidly than cannabis, etc.
REAL tobacco (in my case Drum - and I hear the European version is much more enjoyable than the American version) is much fresher, smells nice when burning, mixes tremendously in spliffs; and although no tobacco smoke is good for you, RYO tobacco contains a fraction of the ADULTERANTS that are added unnecessarily to cigarettes.. addictive contents presumably added to keep smokers hooked because there is no fucking way in hell that they taste better than a filtered, hand rolled cigarette.

 

wtf buys real ciggerets at $5.00 a pack and makes joints.. buy some fucking papers you idiot..

 

^ Even better; you can't beat a pure with well dried bud.

 

I was saying once how strong a poison one could make by cooking down some tobacco, add the oil to a bowl and die instantly.. Woo.. legal killer tobacco crack, if only there was a tek somewhere LOL. :leaving:

 

Here's a few of the many links I found..

http://www.prwatch.org/node/7479

http://www.tobaccofreedom.org/issues/documents/landman/bat/

http://whyfiles.org/183smoking/2.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...-cigarettes-may-be-more-addictive-588248.html

Apparently, it's done by adjusting the smoke pH using ammonia.

 

really? i find the smoke that comes out of a camels ass quite smooth and delicious. but that's just me.


and... i'd have to go with orison here.

pack of cigarettes for 5$
vs
buttload of papers for like $1.50...