If there is going to be a future know this: 2-3 checkpoint security guards with or without metal detectors and with or without arms at places isnt really effective in this here real world. But what do you think? You see, a lone gunman can take those checkpoint security guards out first with a few bullets before targeting the other intended victims (random or known ppl). I say either every abled adult should to be enabled to carry a firearm or every person who should have one of these might rather should have an appointed body guard that government spending pays for. Re-enstate the draft not for men to be stationed overseas in our nation's military, but for men of the military to be mobilized over here and trained to guard with arms certain U.S. citizens in high risk areas. A long time ago ppl needed slaves, now ppl need personal body guards. Either of certain ppl think: 1) that the ppl would be too irresponsible with firearm ownership to where innocent ppl get shot. Or... 2) that the ppl cant really protect themselves where the real danger is outside of their homes. ^^The remedy to all of that is trained armed body guards per person in a rated risk factor. Like persons in high crime areas... The armed body guard watches the home when you're gone or goes with you out to the risky areas or comes with you when you're transporting large sums of money or expensive items. It should be so everyone can simply call up some number for someone to be their armed body guard for a specified time or specified event with respect to their human needs (like gotta eat or gotta go to the restroom). You see, check points make the world slow so fuck that. Know what I'm saying? We dont need security guards to pat us down at every place we go just for safety when you and I know that aint going to stop someone determined to blast some ppl for whatever the fuck reason or problem. We each should have our own firearm to conceal or we should have our own body guard owning an effective firearm to carry in plain sight. What do you all think? Or am I being too futuristic for you? Remember, trust no one and no body. Personal armed body guards will increase your chances of surviving an attack. And increases your chances of not being the one to rob. Who wants to be a robbery target in these risky days? So basically the government need to consider converting the military into trained armed body guards for citizens of the U.S. on the homeland.
Think about this... Most likely other ppl in the surrounding where you're being violated arent going to help you unless it were their job to. I mean, they may only help after the fact where they can be as a witness. But what good is that when damages has been done to you? Military persons converted into armed body guards in the U.S. makes for making and maintaining jobs for ppl. It keeps things flowing. Plus, more and more ppl say we need to spend our money here at home rather than overseas. Well this T.A.B.G. (trained armed body guard) thing for home would mean the government is spending its money correct. Is a mayor a target because he is important or high profile? Is a president a target because he is important or high profile? Well whatever the reason they get protection as one can see. Who pays for their protection? And most of all, who determined that they are targets to get certain protection while the rest of us are not determined to be targets to get certain protection? Why cant certain of us get protection as that of a mayor or the president? Hell, less important, low profile ppl be the real targets. Check the statistics. Maybe we dont need the detailed intelligence of that of the Secret Service, but we seem to nowadays need simple personal protection from a concealed firearm to use when needed or an armed personal body guard.
first it's unconstitutional for our military to work in a police type situation, not that it hasn't stopped the government from doing it before. there are already "body guards" in place that are exmilitary, Blackwater being one of those mercinary type organizations. last i checked bullets don't stop bombs, chemicals or biologicals. terrorists don't go around shooting folks, they just tear a whole area to shit and let the folks upstairs sort it out the good from the bad. do you really want some military person following you around 24/7 that was hired by a government that terroizes it's own people for the sake starting a war elsewhere? concealed handguns and permits aren't a good option due to the fact that folks these days just aren't as familiar with firearms as they were a few decades ago. i had a permit for a few years and went through quite a bit of training despite my military background to get it. most of the people that were at the training would actually hurt many other people if they had to use the gun they were carrying in a hostile situation. they just don't have the required mental capacity. it takes getting shot or shot at repeatedly in a fire fight or ten to acquire such a mental state. in the years i was packing, i never had a situation arise that couldn't be handled faster and safer by hands on contact. you're better off taking martial arts than carrying a gun. it's really hard for someone to hurt you or pull a trigger when they are too busy trying to pick up their teeth with broken fingers.