I dont necesarily refute or support the idea that Hillary has already been decided for president. im quite sure its possible. my only question into this is how somehting like this happens and where is the evidence to show for it? id like to see some real evidence showing that this isnt a conspiracy. i totally believe the possibility but id like to see good info first. i have noticed from the little news i see that they talk a lot about Obama falling behind hillary and now shes up 20% some bullshit like that. outside the media's influence is there any other deciding factor? is it like thart game metal gear solid where there a group of elite men called "the patriots" who really controlling everything? (ha)
It's obvious when you see all the money that's being shovelled into her campaign, the fact that the neocons seem to be supporting her (including Rupert Murdoch), and the way the media is covering her campaign. It's clear she is the anointed one. And if she is elected (or should I say selected), it will make 32 (36 if re-elected) years of Bush-Clinton dynasty control of the White House. The Bushes and the Clintons are like peas in a pod. There is literally no difference between the two, and Bill Clinton and Daddy Bush were close partners in smuggling cocaine into the country in the 80's on behalf of the CIA. If you don't believe me, simply go to Google and type in "Clinton, Bush, Mena, Arkansas." Or watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADd3TIPAbGY. "I personally witnessed complicity between these two men; Bush and Clinton, in terms of transporting cocaine into the US for the purpose of sale to generate money to fight a war." -Terry Reed Air Force Intelligence
I've noticed this also. It's like every story I see is about how great the Hillary campaign is, and how it is now time for her to take her rightful throne or some shit like that. And what do we hear about Obama? That he is an ungodly traitor because he doesn't wear a flag pin on his suit. I swear, I was watching FoxNews some last night, and every commercial break had an ad for the big story that Obama doesn't wear a flag pin.
Obama isn't any better. He too is another establishment yes-man and will probably be selected as VP under Hillary.
It's not a conspiracy theory to presume the election is predetermined, even the mundane idiots watching Fox news have begun to realize that by now. As far as it being Clinton - she's the one I think will be placed in the spot too. The conspiracy theory part comes in when we try to predict how long until the pure One World Government rises. I'm guessing a decade or so.
Probably 5 years. Enjoy those last five years UNLESS we collectively get off our asses and do something
Obama? He's nothing special. He's the same. The only stand up guy I see in this election is Ron Paul... pssh, yeah right. We can only dream. Of course elections are decided ahead of time. If they weren't then, well, voting could actually make a difference.
I personally don't think that any of the candidates are worthy of becoming president. I just think that we need to get rid of all these baby boomers born in the 40s and move on to people who were just kids duing the 60s. The current generation thats running everything is screwing it up beyond repair, always reflecting back on the 60s and on Vietnam and all that shit. We need to move beyond that. Just like thow the WWII generation ran everything in the 60s and 70s, and left us where we are now. I'm just curious of why the media is portraying Hillary as the greatest candidate for the job, even though it is painfully obvious that she's just as corrupt and two-faced as Bush is. Why would anyone in their right mind vote for her? And also why the media is making it a big deal that Obama doesn't wear an flag pin. American flag pins just seems like pointless jingoism to me.
They should promote a ticket of Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, two royal families on the same ticket. These early candidates are mainly poster boys for collecting money. The rug gets pulled from under them later by the RNC and DNC. Look what happened with Dean. He was leading in money and polls before Kerry was ordained. .
Too true about Dean, funny though he didn't seem to broken up about it. He's now the DNC Chairman. Maybe a payoff? Hillary seems to be all the media has wanted to talk about for four years now. They really have been pouring everything into the hard sell. Funny how no one wants to talk about Ron Paul, even though he's done very well in the debates. They'd rather talk about Thompson...go figure!
The way this works is you've made these claimes so now to advoid looking like a herb you have to prove it. Therefore, the burden of proof you're trying to pass off on to others is actually on you. If that is what you totally believe then NO AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE will convince you otherwise. Infact, I would suggest your only qualifications are to be utlized on a califronia jury. The Media undoubtly has their favorites but this is just mere fraudulent banter because in the end the vote really comes down to the electoral college.
