Honestly, im not at all well versed in politics,its not my forte at all, but all the shit that has been going on i feel like i need a HUGE heads up. im so far behind on information im insanely overwhelmed at trying to find the truth about whats been going on and whats about to happen. i dont expect anyone here to give me a proper history lesson but i would like to know one thing: why are we about to attack iran? i know they say because of their 'nuclear ambitions' but its obviously more than that.... if anyone wants to give a second and clue me in to whats going on and whats about to happen i would appreciate it....peace (in the middle east)
It was planned long ago and written about openly in the 90's by the Project for the New American Century. The plan for the Middle East is to overthrow its sovereign nations, installing puppet governments that are subservient to the internationalists and their fiat money system. It's about standardizing the Middle East and bringing them under the control of the same economic elite that runs the West. Oil is only a fraction of the reason, and it's not to obtain the oil as much as it is to control the flow of it. Then they can limit the flow and create artificial scarcity, which will jack the prices up even further.
Money that has no real worth because it's not commodity-backed. They just print the money out of nothing, then determine its value.
Your money from nothing, since 1913 At least before than, it was backed by gold, which takes actual labor to get. So you could determine a value for it. Now, it is printed ad nausea from machines.
but what about after bush leaves office? what if a more respectable candidate comes into office...how do we know this plan will continue? are we just fucked no matter who comes into office?
Yes, because it doesn't matter who is in office, because the president is merely a figurehead for people above him or her. Agendas really never change, only the rhetoric does, and we know Hillary isn't exactly anti-war as it is.
Israel is also guiding the plan. It will secure their position of power and superiority in the middle east. And if we allow this to escalate into Iran and Syria, as it did into Lebanon, the next president will not be in any position to quickly end US involvement. We'll be mired down there for decades. Our military being used as pawns for Israeli and international monied interests. You might want to read this piece: http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/052504.html I have trouble understanding all the convolutions and policies that have taken place over the years, but it's obvious who the power players are. I guess with a US presence in the middle east now, Israel no longer needs to be in bed with Iran. Or maybe it's as simple as GW doesn't want the world to know he was duped.
Yeah, but Israel and the US are really one and the same at the top. That's why the US cow-tows to Israel, which is a Rothschild creation. Israel is just one of the many pieces of the puzzle making up this global agenda, but to say it's "the zionists" is rather misleading, because they are just another of the many fronts visible to the public.
And don't forget about the fat cats who profit off the war machine. After all, war's good for the economy, right?
It's not good for the economy when billions of taxpayer dollars are being spent on those wars. However, to the people at the top, wars are extremely profitable. They never lose out.
http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/election/index.php?nav_action=election&nav_subaction=overview&campaign_id=173
In May 2007, Congress passed a resolution calling on the U.N. Security Council to charge Ahmadinejad (the President of Iran) with the crime of inciting genocide “because of his calls for the destruction of the State of Israel”—a violation of the U.N.’s 1948 Genocide Convention—specifically citing the false “wiped off the map” quote from October 2005. He did not call for "The State of Israel" to be wiped off the map, he was talking about the Israeli regime to end its occupation of Jerusalem. Interesting to note, but not reported in US media, in May of 2006, Ahmadinejad wrote an open letter to President Bush that began “Mr. George Bush, For some time now I have been thinking, how one can justify the undeniable contradictions that exist in the international arena. Can one be a follower of Jesus Christ (PBUH), the great Messenger of God, Feel obliged to respect human rights, Present liberalism as a civilization model, Announce one’s opposition to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and WMDs, Make “War on Terror” his slogan, And finally, Work towards the establishment of a unified international community—a community which Christ and the virtuous of the Earth will one day govern, But at the same time, have countries attacked; The lives, reputations and possessions of people destroyed and on the slight chance of the … of a … criminals in a village city, or convoy for example the entire village, city or convey set ablaze.”
I read that letter, I thought it was very well stated and more statesman like in nature than anything GW and his administration have produced. Read the link in my previous post folks...it's an eye opener. Remember this face: He still has a in Washington and was never prosecuted.
