Topless

Why can't we go topless in public if men can? It's not like we've got anything unnatural, and I don't see why people find the body offensive. It's unfair!

Go on guys let's see your bodies in support of our cause! And women feel free to keep the guys entertained too in support of our "we want to be topless in public" cause.

 

I agree, same thoughts on social and public nudity, people go topless so why not nude on any beach,the body is not to be ashamed of and as i say time and time again,we all know what penis and vulvas look like, the same an every man and woman,so why cover up,no reason, support the nudist society!

 

A few reasons why topfreedom isnt legal for women:

1. People, primarly men consider the female breast to be a sexual organ.
2. This country's lawmakers are heavily influenced by religious groups that consider the female breast to be sinful and indecent if shown in public. They feel the need to impose their own values on other people who dont share them.
3. Many people think the female breast is somehow harmful to children and goes against "family values". They insist on upholding their moral standard, even if we dont agree with it.

Basically all these excuses are nonsense created by self righteous people who think only of themselves and their own agendas. Breasts have nothing directly to do with sex. Theres nothing in most religions that say baring the breast is sinful. Children are not harmed by the sight of a breast otherwise mothers wouldnt breastfeed their children and nobody should be telling people what set of "family values" they need to follow. So despite these excuses theres no good reason why women shouldnt have the freedom to go topfree. In most of Canada, Europe, New York, Ohio and a few other places its actually legal to go topfree so if you live anywhere near there you should be safe, although I would consult the laws in your particular area just to be sure before you attempt it.

 

Going topfree and going nude are two different things. Both should be legal but I think it would be best to concentrate on getting topfreedom legalized and accepted most places before trying to get public nudity legalized because while going topfree doesnt expose any genitals, going nude does and thats a whole different can of worms. I agree both should be legal but people are more likely to accept topfreedom now in most public places than they would nudity. Legalizing topfreedom will go a long way to acheiving that goal though.

 

Top freedom should be legalized. I agree breasts are non sexual, but I'd like to ask those who find breats sexual 'Why?'

Howcomzit? Why do you view the breast as being sexual? Is it because it's seldom seen in public?

 

thats it exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! a wrist an ankle or a knee at one point or another was concidered sexual for that very reason, the more its hidden the more its sexualized
whats the difference between the skin on your wrist & the skin on your breast? not a damn thing except that if its hidden people will want to see it,
think about asses for a momment, asses are sexualized by being hidden, but what is an ass but 2 fleshy cusshiuns to sit on & a rather stinky hole for shit to come out of.. if every ass in the world was out there for all to see, would anyone ever go around saying oh nivce ass, ..oh i want to see your ass.. or would it be more like wipe that dirty stinky ass before u sit on my couch..
my point is, a breast exposed is what it is, how we feed outr children.. an ass exposed is what it is, a rather stinky cushion to sit on, but by making them be hidden, we make them exciting, exotic, & desired.. the fundamentalists who force us into shame over being seen are trying to de-sexualize life by making sexual parts of our bodies be hidden away in shame but the opposite is what they acheive & they sexualize nonsexual body parts in the process
id go so far as to say that a penis & vagina isnt a sexual part unless & untill its being used sexualy
after all sexuality isnt in the parts but the connection, & interaction of entire bodies during the sexual union
(i know i wasnt entirely focused there, too tired to explain that right)

 

^^ Damn Right!

 

ok this is a picture from my galery, when you see it you think oh what a nice peaceful picture or whatever right? if i posted it somewhere with a caption hippies in the woods or whatever, it would get a few views fr5om ppl interested in hippies in the woods, but, if i said there were 15 naked people in it, & posted it as naked hippies in the woods, it would get thousands of views & is suddenly changed from a nice peaceful picture to an opportunity to get arroused if your able to spot the naked people in it (i havent looked close enough to count how many or be sure thgeres any at all im just assumming theres a few & 15 sounds about right) my point is that sexualizing nudity is in the intention of either or both the pressenter & observer


take this picture for instance, post it as hippie love, & it delivers what i t promices, love being shared & someone looking for lovely images of love would be satisfied finding it
repost the exact same picture as hot sexy naked hippies gettin busy in the woods , & the same image can be viewed as sexual,
part is the pressentation, hey look here nakedness woohoo sex sex sex..or.. beautiful images ogf love
.. and parts in the intention of the observer..
i want to get turned on let me see some skin!!
or.. i want to see beauty..i want to see joy..i want to see peace..
the same images can give both impressions right?
its the same with everyday nudity, it can be sexualized by intention, or, can be as commonplace as anything else, just a matter of fact
making it illeghal, immoral, wrong.. makes it unusual, exciting, & something to look for.. gootta find skin gotta find breasts gotta see some this that or the other, just cause its not commonly everywhere you look as a non sexual everyday thing

 

The trick to breaking the 'Nude = bad' spell is to disassociate Nudity from Sex!

 

Here in Ontario, it's legal for women to go around topless. Has been for the last few years now...Haven't seen any women topless yet though.

 

Its legal in New York and Ohio?? i did not know this... is it legal in NYC?

 

The only problem is, im not sure if enough womenwill go topless to cause people to dissacciate breasts with sex..Im sure there alot fo women who wont go topless... hopefully if it get legalized in more places more women will do it... sorry for the double post btw

 

If you want women to go topfree where its legal find things for them to do that would be practical for them to do topfree and make it so theyd want to shed the shirt whenever they can.

 

yep, 'tis true. Legal here in Ontario

 

I can't help thinking that there are a lot of men who are saying "Let's all start thinking breasts aren't sexual and women should go around topess" while actually looking forward to peeping at breasts forever.

If breasts weren't sexual, we wouldn't care.

 

i think that us men think that the breast is attractive because of being taught that it is if we wernt influenced to find it attractive than we prolly wouldnt

 

Shite, I came in here expecting you ladies to be showing off those melons!!! Come on!!! Give it up!!! How's a perv suppose to support his habit?

On the other hand, I do believe women should be allowed to go topless. Puritan values suck.

 

Breasts are not sex organs, so how can they be sexual? Women can get pregnan, even though both of them have been surgically removed.

What breasts are is functionally unique for women. Sure, men love to see them because they are feminine, and usually unseen. If we were all nudists, men wouldn't pay much attention to them in public, unless the breasts were unusual in some way. Once you have seen them by the hundreds at a nudist place, they become quite neutral in appearance.

 

Yep. Here in Missouri in the city Columbia its legal for a female to walk around topless. I've done it a few times.