Why is Ron Paul Never Mentioned Anywere on TV????

This angers me greatly. The MSM will talk about lousy GOP canidates down to the ones on the bottom of the list but no one will ever mention Ron Paul. Its always guliani, obama, hillary, mccain. I have less faith in these news programs than I ever did and it makes me very sad on how America is. Is he corperatly feared? Why is it! I want to punch someone in the face.

 

Well he is just not as much as the puppet politicians.
One reason I love the internet

 

They think by not mentioning him even though he's shown his stuff in the debates that they can discredit him, and make him invisible. It's up to those of us on the internet to force the issue.

I don't want his canidacy looked at like Naders, or Ross Porot. Those of us who voted for those candidates because we felt none of the big party candidates addressed our needs. Paul belongs to the republican party it's time we insisted he was taken seriously. And it's still early. Look at the impact Dean made on the internet, then he sold out. Paul won't do that.

Be vocal, mention his name every time someone brings up the upcoming election. Make his name known. The media is doing everything they can to deny this. We have to force the issue.

 

He is never mentioned because the mainstream media is controlled at the top by the same forces that control both political parties. The mainstream media is dominated by members of groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which features heads of the media and even prolific news anchors, and if there is a candidate who does not stand for their hidden agenda, the person is either ignored or discredited. They are ignoring Ron Paul because he doesn't represent the interests of the big banks which control the political system in this country through control over the money supply. Ron Paul speaks about abolishing the Federal Reserve, and they can't have that. Kennedy wanted to do away with the Federal Reserve and look what happened to him.

 

For those of you that wish to know the CFR is the new hiding ground of the Project for a New American Century. Their members have been absorbed.

 

And of course it's the CFR that's spearheading the move toward the unification of the Americas, or North American Union.

 

This is true, but actually the members of PNAC were members of the CFR before they were members of PNAC, which is really just an offshoot of the CFR.

 

This is not a conspiracy theory it's actually what has happened. The PNAC has all but disappeared but if you look at their membership roles. All those major players are now members of the CFR, which issue news releases and end up even on CSPAN. I wish they would ask Ron Paul to do a couple interviews on CSPAN. I think it would make all the difference.

Rumsfield, Crystol, all those guys, probably even Ashcroft, and Wolfowitz, but maybe they've become more careful about signing documents. But they are still in the wings manipulating our lives. It's time to say no more!

Funny isn't how they all have retired wealthy and so have their friends. The SPP provides for Rumsfield's bird flu pharmacutical company to prosper, while West Nile which has actually affected US citizens has no federal funds provided for it's prevention.

 

Is Yahoo Deleting Ron Paul Questions?

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Is_Yahoo_now_deleting_Ron_Paul_Questions

This is very disturbing. American is scaring me.

 

I bet if Ron Paul gets close to becoming President he will get death threats. If somehow he manages to become president I am will bet money on assassination. There is something very strange going on here and there is lots of evidence everywhere. I'm thinking CFR on this one.

 

On May 3, 2007, ABC News had an online poll after the Republican presidential candidates' first debate. After Ron Paul won the poll, he was removed from the poll result list by ABC News. After receiving complaints, ABC began to delete the complaints. When ABC was barraged by complaints about their deletion of complaint posts, they began to delete the deletion complaints as well.[4] The story made it to the top of the digg.com Top 10.[5] ABC finally reposted the poll results, acknowledging that Paul has a "robust online presence," but attributing it to "viral marketing"

Wiki

 

This is the election where the little man can make a difference if he doesn't buy in to the media hype. Let Ron Paul fall off their radar, let them think we are so dumb the only viable candidates we see are Hillary, Obama and Thompson. I don't think the American public is that stupid. I don't even see that many Nikes on peoples feet anymore.

Hopeful the primaries will show that we can no longer be marketed to.

 

its too bad a lot of people follow the media hype. But the great thing is Ron Paul gets the most coverage on the internet and he is the internet's most popular candidate and I am pretty sure that reaches an age group that is normally hard to reach.

 

You're twenty I fifty seven, think if you listen to him age isn't the problem.

 

I was talking about internet demographics.

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/050807_b_reset.htm

Free Market News
Sunday, August 5, 2007

ABC TV apparently reset its tally of who won the Republican debate it broadcast on August 5, Sunday morning.

At 10 AM EST, Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) was winning the debate with over 1,000 votes. Mitt Romney was next with 106. After the debate at approximately 11:10 AM EST when the tally was rechecked, ABC showed Ron Paul had just 445 votes. Second was “Nobody Won. I’m Voting Democratic.”

Of course, it could all be an innocent gliche, and perhaps ABC will explain these tallies or see fit to rectify them. But it has long been FMNN’s contention, along with others, that Ron Paul, an old fashioned Jeffersonian conservative, would serve as a metaphor and magnifying glass for America’s current political difficulties and expanding corruption.

 

Plenty of Republicans like Ron Paul's take on Goverment waste and overspending.

 

Does anyone think that this can be because of the corporations behind the MSM? I know GE owns NBC and GE sells a lot to the military. Some company that owns Fox News is a client for Rudolf Guliani. We need some sort of watch group or something for this. Elections are shitty.

 

Hey GP......peace brother!

Corporations are all for fiscal restraint, its not logical for them to beat down Ron Paul.
Our Press and Media should function as a watch group.

Doesnt happen evenly though.

 

Of course it has to do with the corporations running the media. The corporations and the government have become one and the same. It's the corporations that literally run the government, so it would make sense that certain candidates are ignored while others are promoted endlessly. For one, corporations are not going to want someone who isn't for big government and corporate welfare. The two go hand in hand. The bigger government becomes, they more power the corporations have and vice versa.