http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17937813/ this is something to think about but i'd rather not think about it. i think that there are some things that scientists shouldnt mess with.
That seems quite a good idea, so that men with fertility problems could still have biological children. Yeah but that's obviously doesn't make for a good story the way absurd scaremongering does.
hummmmm... I guess in the sense that lesbian couples and men with fertility problems can now have kids, it's not as bad of an idea.... I really don't think it's going to "get rid of men" and make this all-woman universe that guy was refering to, though. It's expensive nad kinda pointless in an average relationship. Majorty of couples are straight and want biological kids....why would they do to another woman asking her to donate her marrow?
This whole article assumes that the only reason people have sex is to have children- a theory which a huge franchise in birth control disproved a long time ago. It also assumes that the only males I, as a woman, rely on are the ones I am getting it on with, which is also bullshit. I would've hoped that we, as a society, have evolved beyond the point where we see men as only penises and women as only vaginas.