Poll: which looks better/prettier - cut or uncut?

dangermoose, that's a sad story

i live in eastern europe and i don't know anyone who Would Not be uncut! it's really strange to hear american girls say nasty things about uncut cocks, it's just so weird and ignorant. personally i think that since uncut cock is perfectly functional why the hell should it be cut?!

 

See? This is what I've been saying. This is what many doctors have been saying. Why is there no outcry over this? You hear a lot about female genital mutilation and how it's called "circumcision" and possed off as a cultural rite but what about those of us males who were mutilated as children and now don't fully enjoy sex?

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, pun absoLUTELY intended.

 

Cut v uncut

Pros to being cut -

*health problems eliminated (such as being unable to retract foreskin or short frenulum; infections under foreskin; STD and HIV decreased risk)

*aesthetic issues (looks better; gets rid of smelly smegma from under foreskin; to look like the other guys you know, or your father)

*sexual issues (more exposure of coronal ridge of glans to vaginal walls during sex; easier to get great blow jobs without foreskin)

Cons to being cut -

*health problems (complications from the operation; pain from the operation; too much foreskin taken off - not a "loose" cut)

*aesthetic issues (sometimes looks worse if circumcision is done poorly; where circumcision is not widespread, you don't look like the guys you know)

*sexual issues (desensitization of glans in some guys after circumcision)

Things in life are never black and white, but shades of gray.

 

Ever since my ex who was circumcised, I get really put off by guys with a foreskin, they just don't look pretty. Not that I won't still do a guy with a foreskin, but I much prefer a nice arrowhead. Much better for blowjobs too.

 

What cracks me up about that poll result is that it seems to boil down to some people liking it and others disliking it, which makes you how this thread has run of 7 pages.

 

I'm uncut and proud of it!! if ur cut u have the chance of loosing sensitivity...which would suck! haha

 

Another thing I forgot to mention in my cut v uncut post is that a cut penis displays the seat of a man's desire, the glans, for the world to see. It is a sexual signal whose sight can be arousing in a woman. In an uncut penis, the head is hidden behind a layer of skin until it comes out to play.

 

uncut and proud cut loses sensitivity and who wants all that chafing. not me for sure.

 

Mystic - if you are uncut, how do you know?

 

Uncut.

Don't know what cut guys feel, and not gonna find out!

This is the way of nature.

There is no use in cutting the dick.

Never heard of any guys having their dicks cut because of infection or any other "medical" shit.

The only reason to cut your dick is religion; Islam or Judaism, but other then that, there is no logic in it.

Do you know why are men being circumcised in America?

I'll tell you why.

Ignorant religious conservatives from the mid XIX century.

I those times most believed masturbating makes you blind, and that cutting dicks makes you less horny...

That's the true reason for cutting dicks in America.

Stupid, isn't it?

Although, there is a grain of truth in this ritual, as cut dicks do lose sensitivity...

 

YourBestFriend- You rage on about how stupid it is to cut off our foreskins, but after nearly 100 votes, over 60% like the look of a circumcised penis better, and the women voting like it better by a two to one margin.

Why is that? It could be because cut guys don't know anything else, since they, like me, were circumcised at birth. (But I can't imagine it could get any better than what I have now between my legs.) And the women may only have made love to cut penises.

I would like to hear more from guys who were cut as adults, and made love both ways. Which was better?

I would also like to hear from more women who have made love to several guys with cut and uncut penises. If their experience is only with one cut or uncut, there is not enough experience to make a valid comparison because the guy may have been a very good or very bad lover, irrespective of whether or not he had a foreskin.

 

uncut.


no more need to be said. natural is the way to go.

 

Adding to what Cutted said, are there any guys here who were circumcised at birth, but had a foreskin restoring operation?

It would be interesting to hear from them about quality of sex...

Any way, I just presented the historical facts (no offense cut guys)

 

YBF, you don't have to have an operation to restore your foreskin. There are many non-surgical methods and devices involving gentle stretching over a period of time. They are cheap or free, do not involve surgery, and yield better results. Frankly, I'm surprised anyone gets the operation when there are other options available.

 

My husband is circumcised, and I think that his penis looks beautiful when it is flaccid and when it is erect. My son is also circumcised, and I think that his penis also looks very beautiful, both when it is flaccid, and when it is fully erect, in which state I have seen it (as a teenager) several times. They both have just a little foreskin, that pulls back when erect to completely expose the perfectly shaped, swollen head.

I have also seen many photographs of penises, and I have to say that the circumcised ones look more lovely and symmetrical. I vote cut!

 

This pollis now closed, and the results are....about 60% of you responding (89 in all) favor the look of a circumcised penis when soft, and 40% favor the uncut look. However, the women favor the cut look by more than 2 to 1.
Perhaps this is because the cut penis has a basically uniform look, while the uncut penis can come in all shapes and sizes - some have a little nozzle at the end, others show the glans peeking shyly through a small hole, and still others look like a sausage, with the foreskin tightly wrapping the glans.

 

I love uncut cock. LOVE IT.
soft, hard, it's all good. seriously, i love foreskin.

 

Opium eyes - What about a cut cock with most of the foreskin still there, but just not covering the glans? Even when erect, I can still pull my remaining foreskin over most of the glans. Is that good enough for you, or must you see that "one eyed snake", with the foreskin completely covering the glans when the penis is soft, to be turned on?

When erect, you cannot tell if I am cut or uncut, and this is true of a lot of cut guys. Most cut guys these days have 'loose cuts" like I do, preserving much of the foreskin.

 

haha i love penis no matter how much foreskin is attached.
what you have sounds fairly interesting actually. i wouldn't mind seeing it at all.

 

I'm cut,but uncut looks pretty damm hot!Ahhh...maybe someday I'll be with an uncut guy.