International Criminal Court (ICC) warms up for Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Blair trial

International Criminal Court (ICC) warms up for Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Blair/Ratzinger/Queen/Rothschild/Rockefeller-trial

Global court to decide on launching first trial

Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:01am ET
By Emma Thomasson

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - The International Criminal Court (ICC) will decide on Monday whether there is enough evidence to try a Congolese militiaman for using children as soldiers in what would be the new court's first trial.

A decision to confirm charges against Thomas Lubanga and launch a trial would be a major landmark for the ICC that was set up as the first permanent global war crimes court in 2002 and is now backed by 104 countries.

The court could also throw out the charges, request further evidence and investigations, or ask prosecutors to consider amending a charge. Some victims' groups want the charges expanded to include crimes such as killings, rape and torture.

"What's most likely is that the judges will confirm the current charges against Lubanga in light of the evidence put forward by the prosecutor," said Geraldine Mattioli, international justice advocate of Human Rights Watch.

Democratic Republic of Congo -- rich in gold, diamonds and timber -- was the battleground for rebels, local factions, tribes and several neighboring countries, including Uganda, in a 1998-2003 war in which 4 million people died, mainly from hunger and disease.

Prosecutors say Lubanga, the founder and leader of one of the most dangerous militia in Congo's Ituri district, trained children to kill, made them kill and let them be killed. He was sent to the Hague court last March.

The 46-year-old, who holds a degree in psychology, has denied the charges. His lawyer has accused the prosecution of withholding information he needs to prepare the defense and said Lubanga was Congo's Nelson Mandela -- a man unjustly detained.

Continue to read:
http://today.reuters.com/news/artic...RUKOC_0_US-WARCRIMES-CONGO.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

 

International courts have little to no legitimacy.

 

really? ever hear of a place called nurnberg?

the don't, yet, in today's world, have a whole lot of enforcement clout.
this i for one, do NOT equate with a lack of legitimacy.
assassination lacks the legitimacy of a formal mandate of consensus.
judicial proceedings do not.

so let's extrodinarily render the above mentioned war criminals to stand trial, wherever such a court can be conviened.

THEY established the precident of extrodinary rendition, it seems only fitting that they should 'bennifit' by becoming recipients of it.

and when it comes to the sentencing phase, might i recoment gitmo or abu grabe?

(yes i know this is fantasy, because, let's face it, governments, all governments, even the most powerful, have, at least for the time being, been totaly eclipsed by the corporatocracy. bush and blair and so on are only their puppets. but that ain't gonna last forever either)

=^^=
.../\...