what a whore... plus I heard somewhere that she was what people searched yahoo for the most in the past year.. so I figured hell Id use Brittney Spears as my title to attract some traffic... probably mostly horny old pervs with wrinkly balls and such.. and in some way Im actually making this thread about Brittney Spears very nonchalantly.. I think I just nonchalantly misused the word nonchalanty... oh yea .. brittney spears... do people really think she was the first girl to not wear underwear? it seems as though thats still stuck in the news.. tis kinda lame Im sure if you talk to most of the fem .. welll not just the fem population on this forum mostly everyone... you'll find underwear wearers are not as many as the non-underwear wearers? possibly that just my thought.. oh damn I just went into underwear..... hold that thought have to fix the title... hmm ok... any thoughts? I added word misuse too because I did infact misuse the word nonchalantly right?
That might have been the most intreguing post I've read all night. And cheers to may, because the thread title was totaly ambiguous. That is till I read the thread, then it was right on topic making sure she didn't leave any of the subject matter out.
I don't think you misused the word at all. It doesn't flow very well, there might be a better word. But the meaning of the word works, therefore I think you did fine. uh oh, you better change the title
I didnt think she was in the habbit of wearing pants Your right this thread does attract horny (not so old) perverts with (not so wrinkly) balls like myself.