I have a pretty good idea of what communism is, but im still fuzzy on some parts. could someone give me a quick explanation or a site that explains it well.
The details here vary a little a bit depending on which moron you want to listen to (Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc, etc). - Scientific pretensions. - Teleological (idea that hisotry/society are aiming at some ultimate end: communism). - Different take on history; it always sees it as two classes, one oppressing the other. These classes are the Bourgeoisi (capital owners) and the Proletariat (workers; oppressed). - Waiting for the revolution to come. - Focus on an equality of outcome rather than opportunity. - Communist regimes we've seen typically have a cult of personality for the leader, secret police, command economies, controlled media, etc. At any rate, don't buy into their shit. The first world is gradually moving into a service (post-industrial) economy, where human capital is becoming far more important than physical. And slavery is still illegal, so they can't own you.
It's simple -- communism has always been about utopia for the elite few and enslavement for everyone else. It's nothing more than CONSOLIDATED CAPITALISM in the hands of the ruling class who reign over the masses. The same central bankers who gave us capitalism created communism as part of a controlled hegelian opposition. Marx was funded by the big bankers as was the Bolshevik Revolution. Communism is a fucking sham which only leads to the horrific enslavement of the entire population. That's why the New World Order is to be based on a SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST/NEOFEUDALIST system, modeled after the Soviet system. Anyone who supports communism is supporting their own enslavement.
complete load of bollocks. Britain already is a post industrial society, so are most european countries. However that doesnt mean that everyone is suddenly a marketeer - the economy still relies upon physical labour it just doesnt rely on raw materials as being vital to its economy - in other words the production and refinement of raw materials are not considered to be the prime market force, and neither is the manufacture of goods from raw materials seen as a major factor. The major factor are service industries and retail - also with a higher percentage of homeowners the housing market plays a role in the economy and it is controlled through the interest rates which seek to heat or cool the economic situation There is still a small class which owns the biggest amount of wealth and the rest are employed in its workforce and labour under their conditions - the vast majority still sell their labour and time in return for a few £££££ or $$$$ also communism is not the idea that society is aiming toward an ultimate ideal but that society can transform itself toward an ideologically driven society - one which is based on co-operation rather than competition. It seeks to achieve a co-operative society by a period of socialism or socialisation, which is meant to gear people toward accepting a peoples society of co-operative communes. Stalin for example was not a communist but belonged to a party which advocated socialism and which hoped to transform itself and society into a communist society after a few centuries. The communist party was actually socialists who were attempting to become communists - no-one envisaged communism as an ideal but as a workable society of co-operative communes a massive decentralisation of power It is also worth noting that anarchists and communists want EXACTLY the same thing but anarchists see no need for a period of socialism.They see socialism, and therefore communist parties as dangerously exploitative as capitalism. That aside, Anarchists and communists essentially want communes which are small enough so that every voice is heard in the decision making process - what each commune does to create wealth is up to them, also what individuals choose will be a matter of their ability or willingness to contribute to one or another commune. Though even such a small speculation goes too far and communists and socialists by-and-large agree that to bring capitalism down is the prime objective, as capitalism is both morally bankrupt because of its exploitative nature, and now unworkable due to the fact that the politicians have lost control to corporations which seem hell bent on creating wealth even at the cost of lives in its imperialist bid for power and to the detriment of the planet in its search for more ways to exploit resources and create goods. It is also deeply exploitative in the way it blackmails people into working under its name - it has 3rd world people by the nuts and doesnt let go
communism is a classless and stateless socitey.There has never been communism.The so called "Communist" countires are/are really just dictatorships not resibling the socilaism or communism that Marx or Engles wanted.
Giving full power to the state ALWAYS results in tyranny, buddy. It's called human nature. Marx and Engles were both funded by the big bankers who also gave birth to the same dictatorships you speak of. Marx and Engles didn't just rise up from nowhere like most people think. And it's funny, because you would think Marxists would LOVE our current system, since much of what he outlined in the Communist Manifesto has become a reality in our modern-day society. It's all about complete control in the hands of the all-powerful state. This is why ALL dictatorships are COMMUNIST dictatorships. You cannot have a dictatorship unless power is transferred from the people to the state. You can call it fascism or communism, because they are both the same thing. There is no difference between Hitler's dictatorship and Stalin's dictatorship, other than that far more people died under Stalin.
How were marx and engels funded by bankers?I know the Bolsheviks were funded by bankers but this information is new to me.
When Marx and Engels moved to Brussles in 1845, they reorganized the Communist League, which was formerly called the League of the Just. Engels was also a member of the 'Young Germany' group, which was established by Italian Freemason Guiseppe Mazzini. Marx and Engles were both 32nd degree Freemasons. Marx's Manifesto -- which was really just a ripoff of Clinton Roosevelt's book, The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law, which derived largely from the writings of Adam Weishaupt -- was commissioned by the Communist League in London. The Communist League was simply an offshoot of the Parisian Outlaws League, which had evolved from the Jacobin movement and was founded by members of Weishaupt's Illuminati who fled from Germany. The League was made of some of the richest and most powerful men around Europe at the time, who were behind a lot of the chaos and termoil that spread across Europe in 1848. In David Rivera's 1994 book, Final Warning: A History of the New World Order he states: Many researchers consider them [the League] either a finger organization of the Illuminati, or an inner circle. Originally introduced as the Manifesto of the Communist Party in London, on February 1, 1848, the name was changed to the Communist Manifesto, and the name of Karl Marx was added as its author twenty years later, after a series of small revolutions failed. In 1864, Marx and Engels founded the International Workingmen's Association in London, which consisted of European Socialists who were devoted to destroying the prevailing economic system. It would became known as the First Socialist International, and eight years later it spread to New York and merged with the Socialist Party. Again taken from Rivera's book: Marx wrote to Engels: "I was present, only as a dumb personage on the platform." James Guillaume, a Swiss member, wrote: "It is not true that the Internationale was the creation of Karl Marx. He remained completely outside the preparatory work that took place from 1862 to 1864..." Again, we find evidence that the Illuminati did in fact control the growing Communist movement, but not to deal with the problems of workers and industry; rather it was to instigate riot and revolution. The Marxist doctrine produced by the Association was accepted and advocated by the emerging labor movement, and soon the organization grew to 800,000 dues-paying members. Even though Marx publicly urged the working class to overthrow the capitalists (the wealthy who profited from the Stock Exchange), in June, 1864, in a letter to his uncle, Leon Phillips, Marx announced that he had made "400 pounds on the Stock Exchange." It is obvious that Marx didn't practice what he preached, and therefore didn't really believe in the movement he was giving birth to. He was an employee, doing a job for his Illuminati bosses. Nathan Rothschild had given Marx two checks for several thousand pounds to finance the cause of Socialism. The checks were put on display in the British Museum, after Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, a trustee, had willed his museum and library to them.
They werent jews by any chance - these illuminati ? only someonelse here said it was the jews who funded it all
