1. The Hipforums announces it first ever fundraiser. After nearly 30 years online, we must ask our members and guests to help support the website. Thanks to years of ongoing financial support of our members, advertisers and volunteer admin staff, we have been able to keep the forums alive.

    Now we must ask for help as available funds have all been used for our Internet server and other fees.

    So please donate any amount to our PayPal account donate@Hipforum.com to keep the site going. If we can get enough for a few months fees, we won't need to nag you again!

    You could also subscribe to the forums and get an upgrade to Supporter or Lifetime Supporter here

    You can dismiss this message by clicking on the X in the upper right corner.

    Thanks! The Hipforums Staff
    Dismiss Notice

Justice Scalia says 165,200 a yr, not enough for judges

Discussion in 'Parenting' started by Maggie Sugar, Dec 13, 2006.

  1. Maggie Sugar

    Maggie Sugar Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,001
    Likes Received:
    12
    Yep, the same dude on the Supreme Court, who doesn't want to raise minium wage, says that the average 165,200 a year Fed Judges make "isn't enough to raise a family." ..........for judges.

    But, I guess minium wage is enough for the rest of us trash. Hippocrite.

    Thoughts, mamas? Hell. I'd LOVE 165,200 a year.
     
  2. Stillravenmad

    Stillravenmad Member

    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hmph. The job I'm applying for at Partsearch will make me less than $20,000 a year.

    And that's a good job.
     
  3. stormyy

    stormyy Member

    Messages:
    419
    Likes Received:
    2
    What a douchebag. That is $110,000 more than what we pull in per year, and we manage. Asshat.
     
  4. FallenFairy

    FallenFairy Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    14
    man people are so materialistic sheesh. hell we dont have "regular" jobs and we are managaing. sheesh what a butthead. i think that this guy should spend a year in one of our "shoes" and see if he says it's hard to raise a family on 165,000 a year.
     
  5. homeschoolmama

    homeschoolmama Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,772
    Likes Received:
    12
    Wow, I'd sure like to try to suffer through "only" $165k. Heck, I'd love to know what it's like to "suffer" through 1/4 of that! Sure would be easier than what we're living on.

    love,
    mom
     
  6. mamaboogie

    mamaboogie anarchist

    Messages:
    2,108
    Likes Received:
    3
    I dunno... what if they paid public servants average wages? think things would be a LOT different, wouldn't they? What if being president paid, I don't know, $60k per year (you know, a little extra for the stress levels), none of that lifetime pension crap or cushy benefits. Let's go ahead and pay them hourly instead. What do you think, $20/hour seems fair, no more than what they do. $15/hour for the ones who don't have to pay off high-priced student loans, even less for those jobs that don't even require a degree. How many hours do most judges put in any given week, anyway?
     
  7. TerrapinRose

    TerrapinRose Member

    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    0
    grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not sure if that's my anger or my stomach growling as my family of four survives on $24,000. grrrrrrrrrrrr.
     
  8. Sage-Phoenix

    Sage-Phoenix Imagine

    Messages:
    3,585
    Likes Received:
    4
    Oh really

    My father's job pays just under two thirds of that* and we are very comfortably off as a family of four. Not exactly rolling in it, but can always provide what we need. Which I know people can do on even less more if they're sensible.

    *just put it through a currency converter ($165,200 = £84,062.7) ... though presumably there is a diffrence in the cost of living between there and the UK.
     
  9. drumminmama

    drumminmama Super Moderator Super Moderator

    Messages:
    17,831
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    I'm at less than one eighth of that and I HAVE a degree and a "white collar job."

    sure, you are asking lawyers to leave private practice, although they could continue to profit take from a firm they created, so yeah, you want good candidates. but I'd want to know all benefits before making a complete judgment call (har).
    If it's $165K flat w/o car and travel, well, for the type of profesional you want, that IS market.

    we should readdress how our employment market works.
    WHy should the hardest physical jobs have lousy pay?
     
  10. Piney

    Piney Lifetime Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    5,310
    Likes Received:
    768
    Alan Greenspan got paid less.


    Goverment workers are overpaid in general.

    Let Scalila go work in private industry if he's not happy.
     
  11. Maggie Sugar

    Maggie Sugar Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,001
    Likes Received:
    12
    Exactly. REGULAR normal, middle and working class people would be in government and making the laws. Not the rich and their heirs. No Bushes, no Scalias, no Kennedy's, no Roves, just Ravins, and Boogies, and Sugars, and Hippy and Mono, and Fairy and Pineys and Terrapins and drumins and stomys ect. In other words, regular people, KNOWING what regular people need and want making the laws and legislating them, for other normal people. What a world THAT would be, EH? :)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice