Spread the News

Discussion in 'Cannabis and Marijuana' started by branflakes, Dec 4, 2006.

  1. branflakes

    branflakes Member

    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    No 'smoking' gun -- Research indicates teen marijuana use does not predict drug, alcohol abuse

    PITTSBURGH, Dec. 4 -- Marijuana is not a “gateway” drug that predicts or eventually leads to substance abuse, suggests a 12-year University of Pittsburgh study. Moreover, the study’s findings call into question the long-held belief that has shaped prevention efforts and governmental policy for six decades and caused many a parent to panic upon discovering a bag of pot in their child’s bedroom.

    The Pitt researchers tracked 214 boys beginning at ages 10-12, all of whom eventually used either legal or illegal drugs. When the boys reached age 22, they were categorized into three groups: those who used only alcohol or tobacco, those who started with alcohol and tobacco and then used marijuana (gateway sequence) and those who used marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco (reverse sequence).

    Nearly a quarter of the study population who used both legal and illegal drugs at some point – 28 boys – exhibited the reverse pattern of using marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco, and those individuals were no more likely to develop a substance use disorder than those who followed the traditional succession of alcohol and tobacco before illegal drugs, according to the study, which appears in this month’s issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.

    “The gateway progression may be the most common pattern, but it’s certainly not the only order of drug use,” said Ralph E. Tarter, Ph.D., professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy and lead author of the study. “In fact, the reverse pattern is just as accurate for predicting who might be at risk for developing a drug dependence disorder.”

    In addition to determining whether the gateway hypothesis was a better predictor of substance abuse than competing theories, the investigators sought to identify characteristics that distinguished users in the gateway sequence from those who took the reverse path. Out of the 35 variables they examined, only three emerged to be differentiating factors: Reverse pattern users were more likely to have lived in poor physical neighborhood environments, had more exposure to drugs in their neighborhoods and had less parental involvement as young children. Most importantly, a general inclination for deviance from sanctioned behaviors, which can become evident early in childhood, was strongly associated with all illicit drug use, whether it came in the gateway sequence, or the reverse.

    While the gateway theory posits that each type of drug is associated with certain specific risk factors that cause the use of subsequent drugs, such as cigarettes or alcohol leading to marijuana, this study’s findings indicate that environmental aspects have stronger influence on which type of substance is used. That is, if it’s easier for a teen to get his hands on marijuana than beer, then he’ll be more likely to smoke pot. This evidence supports what’s known as the common liability model, an emerging theory that states the likelihood that someone will transition to the use of illegal drugs is determined not by the preceding use of a particular drug but instead by the user’s individual tendencies and environmental circumstances.

    “The emphasis on the drugs themselves, rather than other, more important factors that shape a person’s behavior, has been detrimental to drug policy and prevention programs,” Dr. Tarter said. “To become more effective in our efforts to fight drug abuse, we should devote more attention to interventions that address these issues, particularly to parenting skills that shape the child’s behavior as well as peer and neighborhood environments.”

    Indeed, according to the study, interventions focusing on behavior modification may be more effective prevention tactics than current anti-drug initiatives. For example, providing guidance to parents – particularly those in high-risk neighborhoods – on how to boost their caregiving skills and foster bonding with their children, could have a measurable effect on a child’s likelihood to smoke marijuana. Also, early identification of children who exhibit antisocial tendencies could allow for interventions before drug use even begins.

    Although this research has significant implications for drug abuse prevention approaches, Dr. Tarter notes that the study has some limitations. First, as only male behaviors were studied, further investigation should explore if the results apply to women as well. Also, the examination of behaviors in phases beyond alcohol and marijuana consumption in the gateway series will be necessary.

    ###​
    CONTACT: Jocelyn Uhl Duffy, UhlJH@upmc.edu
    PHONE: (412) 647-3555
    FAX: (412) 624-3184

    Other study authors include Michael Vanyukov, Ph.D., and Maureen Reynolds, Ph.D., and Levent Kirisci, Ph.D., also of the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy; and Duncan Clark, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. The research was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
     
  2. branflakes

    branflakes Member

    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. rangerdanger

    rangerdanger Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    2
    Marijuana IS a gateway drug, but only due to the fact it's illegal.
    People who want to buy/smoke pot must deal in the black market (dealers).
    Some dealers sell stuff other than MJ. People realize that the gov't has lied to them about MJ and may think that it has lied about meth, smack, crack, etc.
    So they try one of the latter drugs.

    The gov't knows this, in fact it's one of the reason they keep MJ illegal.
    Because the #1 importer/distributors of drugs IN THE WORLD is the U.S. gov't.
    It's one of the 2 reasons the U.S. invaded Afganistan. The taliban had practically wiped out opium poppy growing. (The other reason is the big oil co's wanted to build a pipeline across Afganistan. The taliban declined due to the U.S.'s support of the zionist war against the Palistinians.)
    The taliban offered to turn bin-laden over to an international court if only bushco would present evidence that bin was involved. jr. said "no deal".

    On Sat. the UN released a report that this years opium poppy production was at an all-time high. It's been growing by leaps and bounds ever since jr. invaded.
    Soon this opium will be converted into heroin. Soon that heroin will end up on the streets of the U.S.
    Already prices have dropped and purity increased.
    god bless america.

    -It's a known fact that the invasion of Afganistan was planned BEFORE 9/11.
    -The current head of Afganistan is a former Unocal lobbyest.
    -papabush was head of the cia when they built terrorist training bases for al-queda in Afganistan and gave bin millions of taxpayer dollars.
    -the bush's are multi-millionaire oil barons.
    -in the 80's cia planes would land in Hondura's, off-load weapons to the terrorist contra's, and re-load them with tons of cocaine, which soon ended up on the streets of the U.S..
    -up until circa 1980 it was complicated to convert cocaine to much more addictive (and destructive) crack. It required highly flammable ether (remember Richard Pryor?). There has been talk that elements within the U.S. gov't experimented with changing the way the cocaine cartels converted coca paste into cocaine, changing it so that all that was needed to convert the powder to crack was baking soda, water and heat. They shared this knowledge with the cartels.
    The crack epidemic of the 80's was a creation of former cia top dog papabush and his slimy partners in crime like ollie north.
     
  4. Infinite Sky

    Infinite Sky Member

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    1
    When will this country understand that behavior that 'matters' is purely situational? Someone needs to take some initiative and empiracally prove that "X" number of people cannot be adequately held in check by "X" number of steadfast laws whilst given "X" number of freedoms.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice