Well here's what the Bible has to say about that particular activity. Genesis 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Well I did see what you wrote IN my quoted post, and honestly, if you're too lazy to refute points one by one using the quote system built into the forum, then I'm usually too lazy to bother replying to them... but I'll bite... this time. Thats you're refutation? You CLAIM to be of spirit? I don't deny that we exist on "this plain" but I do deny that we are anything more than a bunch of atoms with a mind. Mind/thought is a process of the brain. There is no evidence outside of personal experience to to suggest there is anything supernatural. Not everyone has these personal. You saying "give us proof we don't" is nothing more than shifting the burden of proof, another logical fallacy. If you're going to make a positive claim (we exist on other plains or spirits exist) it is up to you to support and provide evidence for the positive claim. So far you haven't refuted anything. Another good refutation... LOL Here's another good one..... You are the carbon unit called Paul, I am the carbon unit called Its... If HE exists, HE already knows that we (atheists) lack belief in his existence. Is that a little clearer? I would deny his existence as long as there is no evidence for his existence. You may be right, he could exist and not want us to know about his existence, but then you'd have to argue why there is a bible that "supposedly" reveals his "existence". I happen NOT to believe the bible is the revealed word of the Abrahamic god. So at what point were you going to refute my orginal post? So far all I see is logical fallacies and positive claims that aren't supported. If you're going to refute this post, please use the quote system so I can counter more easily.
No, I'm not saying that. Apparently your comprehension level is low. Even though I'm an atheist (one who lacks theistic belief) to debate with theist, one has to argue from the stand point that he might exist, this is common in debate. I lack belief in the abrahamic god and satan. So assuming these entities do exist, I was saying that Satan knew this god as well, and he rejected this god. This shows that even if god absolutely proved his existence to us, it wouldn't remove free will to accept him or reject him. I can NOT believe in satan, god, heaven, hell or souls that leave dead bodies until there is evidence that says otherwise. Even Christians are atheistic towards all other gods except their own, I happen to not believe in one more god than a christian.
but what i said aint very christian is it ..........call yourself a athiest ........a athiest would"nt try to strip someones prayers for a fellow human being .......call your self a athiest all you like but i see right through your mask ........your nothing more than a warmongering anti christian fuckin prick .........peace you man dont even know the meaning ...........and before you sterotype me a christian church goer think again ............knobhead
speak to you 2moz mr anti christian atheist head .........keep the peace man .......but you would say you have the monopoly on that would"nt yer .
like i said i am of spirit NOT a fuckin atom comprehendo ........or are you really that fuckin thick atomhead ?
Only 10 (now 11) posts and I've already made friends LOL... Don't worry paul, I won't bother replying to you again. You obviously can't debate properly. You have no concept of what debate is. You think that "Shifting burden of proof" wins your case, but in THIS reality, only shows you can't even give the slightest evidence for your positive claims. Are all 3318 of your posts like this? If you dislike my debate so much, please have your spirit contact my spirit to discuss it from now on.
anyways 3 30 am in the good old uk and gotta get me paint brushes out 2 moz "unemployed at the mo " but going over to help paint the arl allotment club 12.30 pm ...........well yer gotta help christian folk out hav"nt yer . good night folks god bless
i think fed up is here so you guys will wake up and stop being narrow minded hipocrits or however you spell it. some of the biggest assholes i ever met were claiming to be "christian". i.e. one day on a travel of mine i stopped at a methodist church asking if i could come in for a drink of water. the response i got was "sorry only members of the church are allowed to use our facillities please go somewhere else" i could have been dieing from thirst come on now. ive met a lot of "unforgiving" christians too. who would call me a "punk" because one of there sons threw my skate board down a sewer hole so i hit him, ironically the man who called me a punk and told me not to come back to this part of this neighborhood was a preacher at the local methodist church, same one i asked for water at. what happened to jesus message of forgiveness?!
why are you guys judging Christianity by it's members? God gave humans the freedom of choice. So, people can do what they want when they want. If they want to call themselves Christian they can, but that doesn't mean that they are.