people in big cars 50 times less likely to die in accidents

Discussion in 'U.K.' started by jonny2mad, Oct 14, 2006.

  1. jonny2mad

    jonny2mad Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,117
    Likes Received:
    8
    research has come out that your 50 times less likely to die in a car accident in a big 4x4 car or a people carrier than you are in a small car .

    would this effect your choice of car if you were going to buy a car , considering that big cars use more fuel and have more impact on the enviroment .

    what are your views on cars , do you have one, going to get one, can you live without one, do you like bikes horses or whatever

    http://motoring.aol.co.uk/size-matters-with-car-safety/article/20061013110809990037?CLI=15996785
     
  2. mudpuddle

    mudpuddle MangaHippiePornStar Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    7,053
    Likes Received:
    4
    What About People Who Don't Ever Use a Car?...
     
  3. lithium

    lithium frogboy

    Messages:
    10,028
    Likes Received:
    22
    You are probably also fifty times more likely to die if you're hit by one of these things. I hate the huge Humvee style SUV people carriers that are starting to appear everywhere here now. We're not America[​IMG]

    I hate cars. They make urban life a dirty smelly dangerous misery. Not to mention the environmental problems they cause. There's no need for them to be in cities other than the selfishness of the drivers. We should congestion charge in every city and commuter route and tax these inefficient cars off the road.
     
  4. shedtroll

    shedtroll Peace, Love & Linux

    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    The reason why you are less likely to die in an SUV is because YOU are in the car CAUSING THE ACCIDENTS!!!!!!
     
  5. shirley

    shirley Member

    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    1
    Think how little accidents there would be if we were all on bikes.. :(
     
  6. honeyfugle

    honeyfugle pumpkin

    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    5
    these huge cars make me sick. they're so dangerous to pretty much everyone in like a mile radius around them. especially kids. if a toddler was hit by a 4x4, he/she would almost certainly die.

    i guess it's because never grew up around cars (my parents don't own one, and i certainly won't ever even take a driving test) that i hate the things with such a passion. i either walk or take public transport. so much better than the anti-social, mega-expensive, bricks-on-wheels known as cars.
     
  7. dapablo

    dapablo redefining

    Messages:
    2,701
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have a car and use it to travel to work and transport my children to their extr-curricular activities. Living in a rural environment cars are a necessity unless you decide to deny your children their opportunities.

    I hate 4x4's with a vengence and can only observe those that drive them as selfish individuals, another thing noticed is quite often these are the same people who insist on collecting children from school gates in cars rather than walking, another superior attitude.
     
  8. Peace-Phoenix

    Peace-Phoenix Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    Likes Received:
    5
    I would never drive a massive gas guzzler, they're selfish, wasteful and bloody expensive to run for that. They should be banned, or priced off the road wherever they exist...
     
  9. shedtroll

    shedtroll Peace, Love & Linux

    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. I said to my parents "I never want to take a driving test". That is the reason, Thy pollute the earth AND the people around them. This is coming from someone who was hit by a car.

    If everyone cycled, used public transport and walked the world would be a safer and healthier place. Luckly, My city is taking note of this.
     
  10. fountains of nay

    fountains of nay Planet Nayhem!

    Messages:
    6,218
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gas Guzzlers aren't cool and new cars aren't as sturdy anyways. I loves me 19 year old car... a lorry hit it and there's not a trace that a full-artic hit it, just a wee dent. Go on survival-Mazda! :D
     
  11. torz

    torz Member

    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    4
    yes you may be 50 times less likely to die in a 4x4 acident but you are more likely to crash.

    clarkson did a programme on 4x4, he tested lodes of them & even crashed a few. they are not as adgile as cars so if you swerve to avoid something on the road (dog, car, accident on motorway) it will turn & just flip on its side & roll & roll & roll. unlike a car which would be able to move out of the way. cars can also stop in a shorter distance than a 4x4 can, i cant remember why but 4x4's seem to have a longer stopping distance than cars. his conclusion was that yes you are less likely to be injured in a 4x4 but you are more likely to crash, and if you hit a car the pasangers are likey to be injured.
    in a way this is quite 2 faced of clarkson because he drives his kids to school in a range rover vogue.
     
  12. Degenerate

    Degenerate Member

    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    5
    It's a nice notion from a 15-year old, good luck with living it when you get hit with the full responsibilities of adult life. It can be doable if you live in a city, but if you're in a suburb or rural location, or work in a specialized field that doesn't offer local opportunities, then you're pretty well stuck. Take my job for instance, It's 20 miles from home to work - and I'm one one of the "local boys" there. The only public transport option is a bus, train to central London, then train back out to where I work - which is massively expensive, makes a half hour journey into two hours and wouldn't get me there for the 6AM start anyway.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice